Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:08:54.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Time of Cutting on the Growth, Yield and Composition of Tropical Fodder Grasses I. Elephant Grass (Pennisetum Purpurevm).(With Four Text-figures.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. D. Paterson
D. D. Paterson
Affiliation:
(Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, British West Indies.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Viii. summary

In the introduction the crying need for research into animal nutrition under tropical conditions is emphasised. In Trinidad the stock are normally fed on mixed natural herbage grazed or cut from waste areas or from cultivated perennial grass crops. This system of rationing is a common one in many insular tropical climates.

The experiment was designed to test the effect of stage of cutting on the yield and composition of Elephant Grass (Pennisetum purpureum), a perennial fodder grass widely cultivated in Trinidad to-day. Three times of cutting were chosen, namely series A—cut every four weeks, series B— cut every eight weeks, and series C— cut every twelve weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , October 1933 , pp. 615 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Staph, O.Agric. J. India (1924), 19, 536.Google Scholar
(2)Kew Bulletin. East African Pasture Plants. 2 vols. (1926).Google Scholar
(3)Kincaid, J. L. B.Growth and Composition of Fodder Crops in Trinidad. I.C.T.A. Dissertation (1927).Google Scholar
(4)Maule, J. P. Nutritive Value of Certain Fodders in Trinidad. I.C.T.A. Dissertation (1930).Google Scholar
(5)Government of India. India in 1930–31, p. 168.Google Scholar
(6)Hammond, J. Empire Marketing Board. Report on Cattle Breeding in Jamaica and Trinidad, p. 58.Google Scholar
(7), Leaks, , Martin. Agric. J. India (1923), 18, 331.Google Scholar
(8)Staples, R. R.Tropical Agric. (1932), 9, 359.Google Scholar
(9), Woodman, , Blunt and , Stewart. J. Agric. Sci. (1926), 16, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10), Woodman, , Blunt and , Stewart. J. Agric. Sci. (1927), 17, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11), Woodman, , Norman and , Bee. J. Agric. Sci. (1928), 18, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12), Woodman, , Noeman and , Bee. J. Agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13), Woodman, , Norman and , French. J. Agric. Sci. (1931), 21, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14), Woodman and , Underwood. J. Agric. Sci. (1932), 22, 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Orr, J. B.Minerals in Pastures. London (1929).Google Scholar
(16)Warth, F. J.Agric. J. India (1924), 19, 600.Google Scholar
(17), Richardson, TRUMBLE and SHAPTER. Waite Agricultural Research Bulletin, No. 66.Google Scholar
(18), Jones, Martin, G.Empire J. Exp. Agric. 1, 43.Google Scholar
(19)Barnett, W. L.Department of Agriculture, Jamaica. Misc. Circ. No. 2.Google Scholar
(20)Fisher, R. C.Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh (1928).Google Scholar
(21)Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture. Tropical Agric. (1931), 8, 272.Google Scholar
(22), Wood and , Woodman. Min. Agric. and Fisheries, London Bull. No. 48 (1932).Google Scholar
(23)Trinidad and Tobago Blue Book (1931).Google Scholar