Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:54:28.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of particle size distribution on soil physical properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. D. Towner
G. D. Towner
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Batcombe series soils readily break down to good tilths, Beccles series soils form cloddy seed beds that are resistant to weathering, and Stackyard series soils form unstable tilths that readily break down. The soils differ in their particle-size distribution. The proposition that such differences contributed to the differences in field behaviour was examined by forming artificial soils, each of which was made up from particles of one of the soils, but redistributed with respect to size in the proportion in which they occurred in one of the other soils.

As a measure of the relevant physical properties, breaking strengths and bulk densities of cylindrical ‘clods’ moulded from the artificial soils were determined. To aid interpretation of the observed soil properties, similar measurements were made on individual fractions, on various other mixtures and on the parent soils.

The breaking strengths of the soils made up to a given particle-size distribution from particles from the different parent soils were reasonably close to each other, with those for the Beccles distribution being more variable. There was a significant difference between the two. The strength of the reconstituted Batcombe soil was markedly greater than that of its parent soil, whereas that for Beccles soil was markedly less. There was little difference for the Stackyard soil.

The bulk densities of saturated soils reconstituted from all nine fractions could be estimated reasonably accurately from the properties of the separate components. The structure of each of these soils in the air-dry state was inferred from comparisons between measured and calculated bulk densities. The breaking strengths of air-dry reconstituted soils were estimated from the properties of the separate components, and agreed reasonably well with the measured values for soils in which the clay and fine silt fractions predominated.

Whereas it was generally possible to predict various physical properties of the reconstituted soils from those of the separate fractions, it was not possible to extrapolate the results to explain field behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , June 1986 , pp. 527 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Catt, J. A., King, D. W. & Weir, A. H. (1975). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. 1. Great Hill, Road Piece and Butt Close. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1974, Part 2, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., Weir, A. H., Norrish, R. E., Rayner, J. H., King, D. W., Hall, D. G. M. & Murphy, C. P. (1980). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. 3. Stackyard. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979, Part 2, pp. 5–39.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. & Williams, R. J. B. (1972). Problems with cultivations and soil structure at Saxmundham. Rothamated Experimental Station Report for 1971, Part 2, pp. 122–142.Google Scholar
Goulding, K. W. T. & Talibudeen, O. (1979). Potassium reserves in a sandy clay soil from the Saxmundham experiment: kinetics and equilibrium thermodynamics. Journal of Soil Science 30, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. (1972). The soils of Saxmundham Experimental Station. Rothamated Station Report for 1971, Part 2, pp. 143–148.Google Scholar
Weir, A. H., Catt, J. A. & Ormerod, E. C. (1969). The mineralogy of Broadbalk soils. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1968, Part 2, pp. 81–89.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1971). Relationships between the composition of soils and physical measurements made on them. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1970, Part 2, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1975). The influence of soil type and manuring on measurements of physical properties and nutrient status of some British soils. In Soil Physical Conditions and Crop Production. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Technical Bulletin No. 29, pp. 324–343.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1978). Effects of management and manuring on physical properties of some Rothamsted and Woburn soils. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1977, Part 2, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1979). Rothamsted studies of soil structure. V. Comparative measurements of density, stability, strength, and water-holding capacity of soils from the Denchworth, Evesham, Ragdale, Hanslope, Salope and Flint Series. Journal of Soil Science 30, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar