Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:04:39.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of faba bean tannins on male broiler chicks: evaluation of hulls from white- and coloured-flowered cultivars and of near-isogenic lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. N. Wareham ,
J. Wiseman  and
D. J. A. Cole
C. N. Wareham
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LE12 5RD, UK
J. Wiseman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LE12 5RD, UK
D. J. A. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LE12 5RD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The hulls (seed coat) of tannin-free, white-flowered and tannin-containing, coloured-flowered faba beans (Viciafaba L.) were used in three experiments (1989–90) to investigate the effect of tannins on the apparent metabolizable energy corrected to zero nitrogen retention (AMEN) and apparent metabolizable nitrogen (AMN) of broiler chick diets.

In Experiment 1, the effects of four rates of hull inclusion from one white- and one colouredflowered cultivar (0, 28, 56 and 84 g/kg) on dietary AMEN and AMN were studied. There was a significant response of AMEN to hull inclusion rate (P <0·001) but no inclusion rate × cultivar interaction. For dietary AMN there was a significant effect of hull inclusion rate (P <0· 001) but no inclusion rate x cultivar interaction.

Experiment 2 consisted of two parts. In both, the total concentration of hulls was 227 g/kg but the ratio of white- to coloured-flowered hulls was varied in five increments; initially over the range 0·42–16·58 g/kg dry matter (DM) and subsequently, with another cultivar, 0·44–7·85 g/kg DM. Synthetic lysine and methionine were added to ensure that the basal diet was not limiting in these amino acids. A significant effect of tannin intake on dietary AMEN and AMN was detected across the greater range of tannin concentrations (P <0·001) but not across the smaller one.

Experiment 3 evaluated three pairs of near-isogenic faba bean lines differing only in the gene governing tannin content and flower colour. Diets were formulated using three bean inclusion rates; 200, 400 and 600 g/kg. At each rate the white- and coloured-flowered lines were mixed in the ratios 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100. The response in carcass nitrogen retention (CNR) to tannin intake was assessed at each bean inclusion rate and for each pair of lines.

There was a significant effect of tannin intake on CNR in only one of the nine comparisons and in that case CNR increased as dietary content increased.

It was concluded that faba bean tannins can have a negative effect on the dietary AMEN and AMN for chicks when present at a sufficiently high dietary concentration. However, the highest dietary concentration of faba bean tannins in Expt 3 was 10·52 g/kg DM, giving a maximum daily intake of 1·03 g tannins for the two-bird experimental unit. At concentrations and intakes up to this there was no evidence to suggest that faba bean tannins had a significant adverse effect.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 121 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 427 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Society for Testing and Materials (1977). Reapproved (1978). ASTM D2015. Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th edn. (Ed. Helrich, K.), p. 70. Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Blair, R. & Mitaru, N. (1983). New information on the role of tannins in the utilisation of feedstuffs by growing birds. In Proceedings of the Florida Nutrition Conference, pp. 139–151. Gainsville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Brillouet, J-M. & Riochet, D. (1983). Cell wall polysaccharides and lignin in cotyledons and hulls of seeds from various lupin (Lupinus L.) species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 861–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, A. & Martin, A. (1986). Variation in tannin content in Vicia faba L. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañon, J. I. R. & Marquardt, R. R. (1991). Some factors affecting true metabolizable energy of fababeans (Vicia faba L.). Poultry Science 70, 568–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, S. S., Cheryan, M. & Salunkhe, D. K. (1986). Tannin analysis of food products. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 24, 401–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, D., Knight, M. & Rees, D. I. (1957). Varieties of broad bean suitable for canning. Chemistry and Industry 16, 1503.Google Scholar
Digby, P., Galwey, N. & Lane, P. (1989). Genstat 5. A Second Course, pp. 56–58. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeland, W. J., Calcott, P. H. & Geiss, D. P. (1985). Allelochemicals, minerals and herbivore population size. Biochemical Systemalics and Ecology 13, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. & Jones, D. I. H. (1977 a). Cellulase inhibition by tannins in the testa of field beans (Vicia faba). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 983–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, D. W. & Jones, D. I. H. (1977 b). Variation in the tannin, phytate and protease inhibitor activity of field beans (Vicia faba). In Protein Quality from Leguminous Crops, pp. 105–115. Luxembourg: Bâtiment Jean Monnet-Kirchberg: EUR 5686EN.Google Scholar
Hagerman, A. E. & Robbins, C. (1987). Implications of soluble tannin-protein complexes for tannin analysis and plant defense mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 1243–1253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, E. (1974). Polyphenol-protein interactions. Biochemical Journal 139, 285–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansman, A. J. M., Huisman, J. & van der Poel, A. F. B. (1989). Faba beans with different tannin contents: ileal and faecal digestibility in piglets and growth in chicks. In Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Antinutritional Factors (ANF) in Legume Seeds (Eds Huisman, J., Van der Poel, A. F. B. & Liener, I. E.), pp. 176–180. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Lacassagne, L., Francesch, M., Carré, B. & Melcion, J. P. (1988). Utilization of tannin-containing and tanninfree faba beans (Vicia faba) by young chicks: effects of pelleting feeds on energy, protein and starch digestibility. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, R. R., Ward, A. T., Campbell, L. D. & Cansfield, P. E. (1977). Purification, identification and characterization of a growth inhibitor in faba beans. (Vicia faba L. var. minor). Journal of Nutrition 107, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, R. R., Campbell, L. D. & Guenter, W. (1981). Purification and identification of an egg size and fertility depressing factor (vicine) in faba beans. FABIS Newsletter 3, 63–64.Google Scholar
Martin-Tanguy, J., Guillaume, J. & Kossa, A. (1977). Condensed tannins in horse bean seeds: chemical structure and apparent effects on poultry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehansho, H., Clements, S., Sheares, B. T., Smith, S. & Carlson, D. M. (1985). Induction of proline-rich glycoprotein synthesis in mouse salivary glands by isoproterenol and by tannins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 260, 4418–4423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picard, J. (1976). Apercu sur l'hérédité du caractere absence de tanins dans les graines de feverole (Vicia faba L.) [Study of the heritability of tannin-free properties in the seeds of faba beans (Vicia faba L.)]. Annales de l'Amélioration des Plantes 26, 101–106.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1987). MLP Manual. Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1979). Metabolizable energy evaluation of poultry diets. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1979 (Eds Haresign, W. & Lewis, D.), pp. 35–49. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sjödin, J., Mårtensson, P. & Magyarosi, T. (1981). Selection for antinutritional substances in field bean (Vicia faba L.). Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 86, 231–247.Google Scholar
Van Sumere, C. F., Albrecht, J., Dedonder, A., De Pooter, H. & Pé, I. (1975). Plant proteins and phenolics. In The Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Proteins: Proceedings of the Phytochemical Society Symposium, Vol 11 (Eds Harborne, J. B. & Sumere, C. F. Van), pp. 211–264. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ward, A. T., Marquardt, R. R. & Campbell, L. D. (1977). Further studies on the isolation of the thermolabile growth inhibitor from the faba bean (Vicia faba L. var. minor). Journal of Nutrition 107, 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wareham, C. N. (1991). Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) tannins in non-ruminant nutrition. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Wareham, C. N., Wiseman, J., Cole, D. J. A. & Craigon, J. (1991). The possible role of methionine in the detoxification of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) tannins in chick diets. British Poultry Science 32, 1017–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J. (1971). The nutritive value of the field bean (Vicia faba) for poultry. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J. (Ed.) (1987). Feeding of Non-Ruminant Livestock (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), pp. 70–77. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Zucker, W. V. (1983). Tannins: does structure determine function? An ecological perspective. American Naturalist 121, 335–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar