Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T04:43:40.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of dates of sowing on Brassica species under semi-arid rainfed conditions of north-west India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Saran
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India
G. Giri
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India

Summary

Field experiments conducted during the winter seasons of 1982–3 and 1983–4 in semi-arid rainfed conditions of north-west India indicated that sowing of Brassica species at the right time can considerably increase productivity. Sowing in the middle of October with daily mean temperatures around 26 °C produced 1·5 t/ha against 0·9 t/ha obtained from the crops sown 1 month later with daily mean temperatures around 20 °C. Under such conditions Brassica juncea cv. Pusa Bold (medium in stature and duration and bold seeded) gave the highest (1·66 t/ha) yield. Eruca sativa could withstand sowing at still lower temperature (19 °C). Increasing temperatures in the second fortnight of February adversely affected the productivity of a late-sown crop by reducing the reproductive phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhargava, S. C., Tomar, D. P. S. & Sinha, S. K. (1983). Physiological basis of plant type in different brassica. 6th International Rapeseed Conference, Paris 7–19 05 1983, pp. 472476.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. & Shastry, A. B. (1981). Crop weather and plant density parameters in relation to productivity and quality of mustard. National Seminar on Crop Management to Meet the New Challenges, organised by the Indian Society of Agronomy, 14–16 03 1981, pp. 259266.Google Scholar