Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:46:07.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hormonal induction of superovulation in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. Scanlon
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University College, Dublin
J. Sreenan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University College, Dublin
I. Gordon
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University College, Dublin

Summary

Eighty-nine cattle were treated to induce high superovulation with 3000 i.u. PMSG on day 16 of the cycle and slaughtered shortly after breeding and injection of 2000 i.u. HCG. In the 79 cattle that came in oestrus, the mean number of ovulations was 9.0. The percentage of follicles ovulating and the mean ovulation rate increased markedly as the interval between PMSG and oestrus increased from 2 to 5 days. Seventy-one percent of eggs shed were recovered; 68% of eggs recovered were cleaved. Evidence on cleavage stages attained, and on the location of eggs in the Fallopian tubes and uterus, suggests that a majority of eggs were capable of normal development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, T. L., Fahning, M. L. & Gkaham, E. F. (1962). Investigations associated with the transplantation of bovine ova. J. Reprod. Fert. 3, 212–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, H. & Rowson, L. E. A. (1952). The production of viable bovine ova. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42, 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casida, L. E., Nalbandov, A., Mcshan, W. H., Meyer, R. K. & Wisnicky, W. (1940). Potential fertility of artificially matured and ovulated ova in cattle. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Prod. 302–3.Google Scholar
Denny, J. E. F. M. (1964). Ovulation control as a first step in the induction of twin-births in dairy cattle. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. pp. 5759.Google Scholar
Dowling, D. F. (1949). Problems of the transplantation of fertilized ova. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39, 374–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dznrk, P. J., Donker, J. D., Nichols, J. R. & Petersen, W. E. (1958). Problems associated with the transfer of ova between cattle. Tech. Bull. Minn. Agr. Exp. Stn. no. 222.Google Scholar
Gordon, I., Williams, G. & Edwards, J. (1962). The use of serum gonadotrophin (PMS) in the induction of twin pregnancy in the cow. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 143–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E., Sugie, T. & Gordon, I. (1963). Superovulation and related phenomena in the beef cow. I. Superovulatory responses following PMS and HCG injections. J. Reprod. Fert. 5, 359–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. J. & Laing, J. A. (1946). Development of the cow egg up to the stage of blastocyst formation. J. Anat. 80, 194204.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr (1949). Induced twin ovulation and multiple pregnancy in cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39, 222–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr & Bhattacharya, P. (1944). Control of ovulation in the cow. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 34, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowson, L. E. A. (1951). Methods of inducing multiple ovulations in cattle. J. Endocrin. 7, 260–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed