Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:11:45.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth, yield and composition of certain tropical fodders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. D. Paterson
D. D. Paterson
Affiliation:
(The Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, British West Indies.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Xii. summary

The experiment was designed to compare under Trinidad conditions three varieties of fodder grass and ascertain the correct stage at which each should be cut to give the maximum nutritive value per acre. It consisted of a yield trial in the form of a Latin square in which the treatment series included four cutting rotations on main plots and three varieties of fodder grass on subplots as appended

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1935 , pp. 369 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Paterson, D. D.J. agric. Sci. (1933), 23, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Hardy, F.Proc. agric. Soc. Trin. Tob. (1934), 34, 443.Google Scholar
(3)Kew Bulletin. East African Pasture Grasses (1926), 1.Google Scholar
(4)Kincaid, J. L. B. I.C.T.A. Dissertation (unpublished).Google Scholar
(5)Woodman, H. E., Blunt, D. L. and Stewart, J.J. agric. Sci. (1926), 16, 205et seq., vols. 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Deerr, Noel.Cane Sugar (1921). London.Google Scholar
(7), Fagan and , JonesBull. Welsh Pl Breed. Sta. (1924), Series H, No. 3.Google Scholar
(8)Sprague, H. B.Soil Sci. (1933), 36, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Richardson, A. E. V., Trumble, H. C. and Shapter, R. E.Bull. Coun. Sci. industr. Res. Aus. No. 66.Google Scholar
(10)Kirsch, W.Bull. Bur. Pl Genet., Aberystw., Herbage Plants, No. 8.Google Scholar
(11)Follett-Smith, R. R.Agric. J. Brit. Guiana (1930), 3, 142.Google Scholar
(12)Aiyer, A. R. P. and Kayasth, R. N.Agric. Live-Stk India (1931), 1, 526.Google Scholar
(13)Dep. Agric. Sudan. Report of Sudan Government Chemist (1931).Google Scholar
(14)Henrici, M.Report Director of Vet. Serv., S. Africa (1930), p. 421.Google Scholar
(15)Orr, J. B.Sixth Report of Committee on Mineral Content of Natural Pastures (1931).Google Scholar
(16)Henrici, M.Bull. Dep. Agric. S. Afr. (1932), No. 115.Google Scholar
(17)Richardson, A. E. V.The effect of climate on the composition of pasture plants. Imp. Bur. Animal Nutrition, Aberdeen. Occ. Comm. No. 1 (1933).Google Scholar
(18)Stapledon, R. G. and Davies, W.Bull. Welsh Pl Breed. Sta. Series H, No. 10 (1930).Google Scholar
(19)Wilsie, C. P. and Takahashi, M.Bull. Hawaii agric. Exp. Sta. No. 72 (1934).Google Scholar
(20)Wood, T. B. and Woodman, H. E.Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., No. 48 (1933).Google Scholar