Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:26:15.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth of vining peas:II. The effect of density of planting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. T. Meadley  and
G. M. Milbourn
J. T. Meadley
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London) Ashford, Kent
G. M. Milbourn
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London) Ashford, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Yield and growth analysis has been carried out on vining peas (variety Dark Skinned Perfection) sown at 43, 97 and 172 seeds/m2 at a rectangularity of 1:1. No difference wasobtained in the yield of green peas (at tenderometer reading 110) over this fourfolddifferencein sowing density.

At a high seed rate (172/m2) a high peak leaf area (8·3) was attained 1 week afterthe start of flowering but declined rapidly. The peak number of flowers and pods reached 1002/m2 at this density, but there was a greater wastage (34 %) by abscission than inthe lower seed rates which resulted in a similar number of pods/unit area being present at the time of vining for all densities.

In contrast, peas sown at low density (43/m2) resulted in a lower peak leaf area (4·3) but this occurred during the stage of pod fill; net-assimilation rate was somewhat higher also. Thus the yield of green peas may depend less on the ability of the plant stand to provide reproductive nodes than on its ability to produce photosynthate during the post-flowering period.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 273 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adam, W. B. (1958). Ripening of green peas; 1957. Tech. Memo. Fruit Veg. Cann. quick Freez. Res. Ass. 24.Google Scholar
Berry, G. (1966). A yield tenderometer relationship in shelled peas for adjusting yield to a given maturity. J. agric. Sci., Oamb. 66, 121–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1962). Pea spacing results at Wellesbourne. Paper N.A.A.S. Vining Pea and Bean Group, Minist. Agric. Lond. 34, (unpublished).Google Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1963). Crop spacing and management under weed free conditions. Crop production in a Weed-free Environment, p. 90. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hardwick, R. C. & M., Mxlboubn G. (1967). Yield analysis in vining peas. Agric. Prog. 42, 24–31.Google Scholar
Kertesz, Z. I. (1935). The chemical determination of the quality of canned green peas. N.Y. St. agric. exp. Sin. Tech. Bull. 233.Google Scholar
Kino, J. M. (1966). Row widths and plant population in vining peas. Pea Growing Research Organisation, Yaxley, England. Misc. Publ. no. 18.Google Scholar
Milbourn, G. M. & Hardwick, R. C. (1968). Thegrowth of vining peas I. The effect of time of sowing. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsi, M. & Saeki, T. (1953). The light factor in plant communities and dry matter production. Jap. J. Bot. 14, 22–5.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. D. (1966). Methods for assessing vining pea varieties in field trials. J. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. 10, 571–93.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Williams, J. B. (1967). The effect of irrigation on pea crops grown at different plant densities. J. hort. Sci. 42, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar