Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:58:20.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and yield of sugar beet on contrasting soils in relation to nitrogen supply: II. Growth, uptake and leaching of nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. J. Last  and
A. P. Draycott
P. J. Last
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Nine field experiments with sugar beet in 1968–70 tested eight amounts of nitrogen fertilizer (0–290 kg N/ha) on a shallow calcareous loam (Icknield Series), on a deep sandy loam (Newport Series) and on a heavy clay loam (Evesham Series). The amount of mineral nitrogen in the top and sub-soils was determined before applying fertilizer and at monthly intervals from May to October in plots given 0, 125 and 250 kg N/ha. The crop on these plots was also sampled at monthly intervals throughout the growing season and the yield and nitrogen uptake determined. The soil analyses indicated that in springs with average rainfall, the leaching losses of nitrogen fertilizer are negligibly small, although there was some evidence that losses may be greatest on sandy loams. In very wet springs such as 1969, with almost double the normal rainfall, losses through leaching are considerable – on average, 40 kg N/ha. Dry-matter yields and response to nitrogen fertilizer differed between the three soils consistently from year to year. On the calcareous loam, neither amount of fertilizer changed the dry-matter yield of roots in any year. The crop on the clay loam needed a small dressing and on the sandy loam a larger dressing of fertilizer for maximum root dry-matter yield. Uptake of nitrogen by the crops usually paralleled the decreases in soil mineral nitrogen although on the clay loam nearly a third of the nitrogen applied could not be accounted for in the soil or plants, suggesting that some denitrification may have taken place. When the amount of nitrogen taken up by unfertilized crops is allowed for, the percentage recovery of applied fertilizer nitrogen at final harvest ranged from 42% on the calcareous loams to 62% on the sandy loams.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , August 1975 , pp. 27 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bremner, J. M. (1965). Monograph. American Society of Agronomy 9, 1179–1237.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Webb, D. J. (1971). The effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. Part I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, P. J. & Draycott, A. P. (1972). Top dressing of nitrogen for sugar beet. Experimental Husbandry no. 22, 82–8.Google Scholar
Last, P. J. & Draycott, A. P. (1975). Growth and yield of sugar beet on contrasting soils in relation to nitrogen supply. I. Soil nitrogen analyses and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 85, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, P. J. & Tinker, P. B. (1968). Nitrate nitrogen in leaves and petioles of sugar beet in relation to yield of sugar and juice purity. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 383–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, A. (1950). Critical levels of sugar beet established from analysis of petioles and blades with special reference to yields and sucrose concentrations. Soil Science 69, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar