Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:18:22.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and development of bush tomatoes in relation to temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Gray ,
J. A. Ward  and
Joyce R. A. Steckel
D. Gray
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
J. A. Ward
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
Joyce R. A. Steckel
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Data are presented relating various stages of growth of field-grown bush tomatoes cv. Sleaford Abundance established from dry and pre-germinated seeds and from transplants to accumulated day-degrees. In general, Ontario units predicted the dates of 50% flowering, of the first harvest and the date when 37·5 t/ha of ripe fruit had been picked, more accurately than day-degrees above 10 °C or calendar days. The number of Ontario units from sowing to 50% flowering for dry and pre-germinated seeds were 956 ± 35 and 871 ± 85, respectively. The corresponding figures from sowing to first harvest were 1958 ± 59 and 1867 ± 85. For transplanted crops the number of Ontario units from planting to 50 % flowering and from planting to first harvest were 322 ± 62 and 1352 ± 133, respectively. For transplanted crops the number of Ontario units required to give a yield of ripe fruit of 37·5 t/ha (the minimum level currently necessary on economic grounds for tomatoes for processing) was 1937 ± 112. Using this figure in conjunction with long-term meteorological records it was estimated that crops established from transplants at East Mailing, Kent (latitude 51° N), would fail to give yields of ripe fruit of 37·5 t/ha by late September on only 1–6 occasions in 100 whereas at Wellesbourne, Warwickshire (52° N) and Warsop, Nottinghamshire (53° N) crops would fail to reach this yield on 13–53 occasions in 100. Crops established directly from seeds would fail to give this yield on more than 50 occasions in 100 at all three sites.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 285 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, . (1946). Tables for the evaluation of daily values of accumulated temperature above and below 42 °F from daily values of maximum and minimum temperature. Meteorological Office: Met. O. Leaflet no. 10 (formerly Form 3300).Google Scholar
Anon, . (1954). Agricultural Statistics 1950–1, England and Wales. London: H.M.S.O., pt. 1.Google Scholar
Anon, . (1965). Agricultural Statistics 1962–3, England and Wales. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Aung, L. H. (1976). Effects of photoperiod and temperature on vegetative and reproductive responses of Lycopersicon esculenlum Mill. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 101, 358–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. E. & Ries, S. K. (1968). Use of heat units to predict dates for once-over tomato harvest. HortScience 3, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. H. (1972). Heat units for corn in Southern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Agdex 111/31.Google Scholar
Buntino, E. S. (1976). Accumulated temperatures and maize development in England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 577–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. & Hough, M. N. (1978). The influence of climate on maize production in North-Western Europe. In Forage Maize (ed. Bunting, E. S., Pain, B. F., Phipps, R. H., Wilkinson, J. M. and Gunn, R. E.). London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Gray, D. & Steckel, J. R. A. (1976). Production of tomatoes for processing and mature green tomatoes for storage. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1975, p. 63.Google Scholar
Gray, D., Steckel, J. R. A. & Ward, J. A. (1979). The effects of fluid sowing pre-germinated seeds and transplanting on emergence, growth and yield of outdoor bush tomatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, G. (1965). Growth and development in the young tomato. III. The effect of night and day temperatures on vegetative growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 16, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. S. & Hartley, H. O. (1954). Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, vol. I, p. 31. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J. (1960). Growth and development of early summer cauliflower in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Horticultural Science 35, 21—33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skapski, H. & Lipinski, Z. (1978). The influenco of various methods of propagation on the timing of tomato production. Ada Horticulturae 72, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. P. (1976). The Agricultural Climate of England and Wales. Technical Bulletin 35. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Went, F. W. (1944). Plant growth under controlled conditions. II. Thermoperiodicity in growth and fruiting of the tomato. American Journal of Botany 31, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Went, F. W. (1945). Plant growth under controlled conditions. IV. The relation between age, light, variety and thermoperiodicity of tomatoes. American Journal of Botany 32, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Went, F. W. (1950). The response of plants to climate. Science 112, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Went, F. W. (1957). Solanaceae. In Experimental Control of Plant Growth. Waltham, Massachusetts. Chronica Botanica, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
Went, F. W. & Cosper, L. (1945). Plant growth under controlled conditions. VI. Comparisons between field and air-conditioned greenhouse culture of tomatoes. American Journal of Botany 32, 643–654.Google Scholar