Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:02:59.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grazing studies on the Guadalcanal Plains, Solomon Islands

3. Comparison of existing mixtures with koronivia (Brachiaria humidicola) and with natural pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. A. Smith  and
P. C. Whiteman
M. A. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
P. C. Whiteman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pastures of a mixture of Brachiaria mutica(para) and B. decumbens(signal) grown with Gentrosema pubescens(centro) and Macroptilium atropurpureumcv. Siratro and grazed at three stocking rates 1·8, 2·1 and 3·6 animals/ha for 5 and 6 years of grazing were compared with B. humidicolacv. Tully (Koronivia) oversown with centro and siratro and grazed at 3·0, 3·6 and 4·5 animals/ha and native pastures of Themedaaustralis and Pennisetum polystachyon oversown with Stylosanthes guianensis cv. Schofield after burning, and grazed at 1·3, 2·0 and 2·7 animals/ha. All pastures were given 20 kg/ha of sulphur.

The para and centro pasture gave the highest live-weight gain with 731 kg/ha/year when stocked at 3·6 animals/ha in 1979–80. and 592 kg/ha/year in 1980–1. Signal grass gave 621 and 493 kg/ha/year in 1979–80 and 1980–1 at 3·6 animals/ha. Koronivia grass gave similar production as signal: 639, 466 and 406 kg/ha/year at 3·6 animals/ha stocking rate from 1979 to 1982. On the natural pastures 1st year gains were high, 412 kg/ha/year at 2·7 animals/ha, but declined to 224 kg/ha/year at 2·0 animals/ha in year 2.

In the para pastures, centro increased up to 50%, while with signal it increased to 25% of the botanical composition, owing to a decline in grass dry matter. In koronivia pastures, centro and siratro declined, inversely with stocking rate, and M.pudica increased in the high stocking rate. In the natural pastures T. triandra declined with increasing stocking, to 1% at 2·7 animals/ha. P. polystachyon remained approximately stable. M. pudica became important as grazing increased, and weeds also increased. Para grass was high in N, P, S and Na. N was low in signal, koronivia and T. triandra while the concentration of Na (0·41%) was high in koronivia, but it was extremely low in signal and T. triandra(0·02%).

The trials suggest that landholders could commence grazing of existing natural pastures for up to 2 years at about 2·0 animals/ha in the 1st year and 1·3 animals/ha in subsequent years to obtain 350 kg LWG/ha in year 1 and the 200 kg LWG/ha thereafter. With cultivated pastures much higher yield can be obtained using para plus centro on the low-lying aieas, and signal plus centro plus siratro on non-flooded areas. Koronivia can be used in occasionally intensively stocked areas. All pastures require S fertilizer every 2 years.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 181 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Technical Review, Agricultural Research Council, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal U.K., 351 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982). Brachiaria humidicola cv. Tully (koronivia grass). Register of the Australian Herbage Plant Cultivars, Canberra, Australia: C.S.I.R.O.Google Scholar
Bishop, H. G. (1981). How to get legumes back into old pastures. Tropical Grasslands 15, 120–121.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. M., Murphy, G. M., Maroske, M. M. & Arnold, G. (1980). Milk yield response following sodium chloride supplementation of cows grazing a tropical grass—legume pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 20, 543–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Sandland, R. L. (1974). The relation between animal gain and stocking rate: derivation of the relation from the results of grazing trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. A. (1980). Observations on the phosphorus requirement of cattle for growth. Research in Veterinary Science 28, 258–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, I. J. (1980). The effect of grazing and superphosphate on a naturalized legume, Desmodium heterophyllum, on hill land in Fiji. Tropical Grasslands 14, 63–68.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. G. (1972). Contribution to yield, nitrogen fixation and transfer by local and exotic legumes in tropical grass-legume mixtures in Western Samoa. Tropical Grasslands 16, 76–80.Google Scholar
Smith, G. S., Middleton, K. R. & Edmonds, A. S. (1980). Sodium nutrition of pasture plants. I. Translocation of sodium and potassium in relation to transpiration rates. New Phytologist 84, 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. J. H., Smith, M. A. & Whiteman, P. C. (1980). A Pasture Handbook for the Solomon Islands, pp. 43–45. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Honiara, Solomon Islands.Google Scholar
Watson, S. E. & Whiteman, P. C. (1981a). Grazing studies on the Guadalcanal Plains, Solomon Islands. 1. Climate, soils and soil fertility assessment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, S. E. & Whiteman, P. C. (1981b). Grazing studies on the Guadalcanal Plains, Solomon Islands. 2. Effects of pasture mixtures and stocking rate on animal production and pasture components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, W. H., Edye, L.A. & Williams, W. T. (1977). Effects of fertilizers and stocking rate on pasture and beef production from sown pastures in northern Cape York. 2. Beef production and its relation to blood, faecal and pasture measurements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 17, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar