Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:43:32.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grazing studies on the Guadalcanal Plains, Solomon Islands. 2. Effects of pasture mixtures and stocking rate on animal production and pasture components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. E. Watson  and
P. C. Whiteman
S. E. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
P. C. Whiteman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Animal production was compared on three pastures, Brachiaria mutica (para), B. decumbens (signal) and Panicum maximum cv. Hamil (hamil) each sown with a common legume mixture of Centrosemapubescens (centro), Macroptilium atropurpureum cv. Siratro, and Stylosanthes guianensis cv. Endeavour (stylo), at four stocking rates, 1·8, 21·87, 31·86, and 41·85 animals/ha, over 4 years on the GuadalcanalPlains, Solomon Islands.

Mean live-weight gain per head over the four stocking rates and 4 years on para pastures was 01·847, on signal pastures 01·838, and on hamil pastures 01·828 kg/head/day. Mean production per hectare at the optimum stocking rates were: para at 3.6 animals/ha, 607 kg; signal at 31·86 animals/ha, 442 kg; hamil at 21·87 animals/ha, 362 kg/ha/year.

The high stocking rates of 31·86 and 41·85 animals/ha caused the hamil pastures to decline to the stage where they were destocked in the 4th year of grazing.

Superior production on para pastures was not simply related to green dry matter (GDM) on offer. In the 1st year of grazing, GDM was highest in hamil pastures, but in the 2nd year highest in para, and in the 3rd year mean yields were similar in all pastures, but were very low at the 31·86 and 41·85 animals/ha stocking rate in the hamil pastures.

Para pastures maintained highest legume contents. The quadratic relationship between live-weight gain/head and legume content was significant over all pastures and stocking rates. Live-weight gain (LWG) per head increased up to 15% legume content, after which there was little change. Yield of green leaf, percentage green leaf, and sward bulk density did not appear to be related to LWG/head. Para pastures had lower values for all these components than the other pastures.

Chemical factors contributed to the higher animal production from para pastures. Para leaf maintained consistently higher in vitro dry-matter digestibility values. Na content of para averaged 01·812%, whereas other species were 01·801 to 01·802%, and below the critical level (01·805%) for animal intake. N and S in leaf material, and Cu in total tops were also consistently higher in para grass.

Results of this grazing trial suggest that selection of grass species on the basis of quality including dry-matter digestibility and mineral content, on ability to persist with increasing stocking rate, on compatibility with legumes, and on growth habit are more important than selection for dry-matter yield.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 353 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogdan, A. V. (1977). Tropical Pasture and Fodder Plants, pp. 59–62. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Firth, J. A., Evans, T. R. & Bryan, W. W. (1975). Effects of soils, fertilizers and stocking rates on pastures and beef production on the Wallum of south-east Queensland. 4. Budgetary appraisals of fertilizer and stocking rates. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. (1974). The relation of animal and pasture production to stocking rate on legume based and nitrogen fertilized subtropical pastures. Proceedings Australian Society of Animal Production 10, 340–343.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Sandland, R. L. (1974). The relation between animal gain and stocking rate. Derivation of the relation from the results of grazing trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laredo, M. A. & Minson, D. J. (1973). The voluntary intake, digestibility, and retention time by sheep of leaf and stem fractions of five grasses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 875–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannetje, L. T (1974). Relation between pasture attributes and live weight gain on a subtropical pasture. Proceedings XII International Grassland Congress, Moscow, pp. 386–390.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1971). The digestibility and voluntary intake of six varieties of Panicum. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 11, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Mcleod, M. N. (1972). The in vitro technique. Its modification for estimating digestibility of large numbers of tropical pasture samples and its application in a study of five grasses. Technical Paper No. 8, Division of Tropical Pastures, C.S.I.R.O.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Stobbs, T. H., Hegarty, M. P. & Playne, M. J. (1976). Measuring nutritive value of pasture plants. In Tropical Pasture Research Principles and Methods (ed. Shaw, N. H. and Bryan, W. W.), Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. Bulletin No. 51 p. 308.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1970). Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. No. 4. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Washington National Academy of Science, National Research Council, 4th edn.Google Scholar
Nitis, I. M., Rika, K., Supardjata, M., Nurbudhi, K. D. & Humphreys, L. R. (1976). Productivity of improved pastures grazed by Bali cattle under coconuts. Department of Animal Husbandry, Province of Bali Publication No. 1 (05).Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. (1975). The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pasture. II. Influence of fertilizer nitrogen on the size of bite harvested by Jersey cows grazing Setaria anceps cv. Kazungula swards. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 997–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, A. R. (1975). Sulphur cycling in grazed pastures. In Sulphur in Australasian Agriculture (ed. McLachlan, K. D.), pp. 68–75. Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, B. (1974). Stocking rate relationships with tropical pastures. Proceedings Australian Conference on Tropical Pastures, Townsville, Volume 2, pp. 31–35.Google Scholar
Watson, S. E. & Whiteman, P. C. (1981). Grazing studies on the Guadalcanal Plains, Solomon Islands. 1. Climate, soils and soil fertility assessment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. & Taylor, J. C. (1973). Beef Production from Grassland,118 pp. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Willoughby, W. M. (1958). A relationship between pasture availability and animal production. Proceedings Australian Society of Animal Production 2, 42–45.Google Scholar
Yates, J. J., Edye, L. A., Davies, J. G. & Haydock, K. P. (1964). Animal production from Sorghum almum pastures in south east Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 4, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar