Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:24:02.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gibberellic acid and the growth of crop plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. G. Morgan  and
G. C. Mees
D. G. Morgan
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks.
G. C. Mees
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Field trials with gibberellic acid on grass, wheat, potatoes, turnips, carrots, peas, runner beans, lettuce, celery, blackcurrants, kale and maize are described. The effects on plant growth and crop yield were determined.

2. The experiments on grassland were carried out between July 1953 and June 1956, and included trials at four different centres. They all gave essentially similar results.

3. 2 oz. per acre of gibberellic acid sprayed at 100 gal. per acre stimulated the growth of all components of the swards. The stimulation was most clearly seen in spring and autumn when the natural growth rate was slow. At these times gibberellic acid was able to produce a grazeable growth of grass more rapidly than nitrogenous fertilizers. The stimulation of growth was accompanied by yellowing of the grass, but recovery to a normal green colour was speeded up by applying a nitrogenous fertilizer at the same time as the gibberellic acid spray.

4. The dry-matter yields at the first cut following a treatment with gibberellic acid were increased by 0·6–10·8 cwt. per acre. The crude protein yields were also increased by the treatment, but to a relatively smaller degree, and the protein content of the grass was reduced by between ½ and 2%. The contents of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, calcium, barium, magnesium, manganese, copper, aluminium and tin were not altered.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 1958 , pp. 49 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashton, F. L. (1935). J. Soc. Chem. Ind. Lond. 55, 106.Google Scholar
Ashton, F. L. (1936). J. Agric. Sci. 26, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrow, A., Brian, P. W., Chester, V. E., Curtis, P. J., Hemming, H. G., Henehan, C., Jefferys, E. G., Lloyd, P. B., Nixon, I. S., Norris, G. L. F. & Radley, M. (1955). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 6, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brian, P. W., Elson, G. W., Hemming, H. G. & Radley, M. (1954). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 5, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukovac, M. J. & Wittwer, S. H. (1956). Quart. Bull. Mich. Agric. Exp. Sta. 39, 307.Google Scholar
Crider, F. J. (1955). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1102.Google Scholar
Greenhill, A. W. & Pollard, A. G., (1935). J. Soc. Chem. Ind. Lond. 54, 104.Google Scholar
Kurosawa, E. (1926). Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Formosa, 16, 213.Google Scholar
Levi, E. B. & Madden, E. A. (1933). N. Z. J. Agric. 46, 267.Google Scholar
Yabuta, T. & Hayashi, T. (1939). J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Japan, 15, 257.Google Scholar
Yabuta, T., Sumiki, Y. & Takahashi, T. (1943). J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Japan, 19, 396.Google Scholar
Yabuta, T., Sumiki, Y. & Takahashi, T. (1951). J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Japan, 24, 395.Google Scholar