Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:51:14.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: an analysis of growth in oryx, eland and zebu cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. B. Carles ,
J. M. King  and
B. R. Heath
A. B. Carles
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053, Kabete, Kenya
J. M. King
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Leadership Foundation of Washington D.C., P.O. Box 48177, Nairobi, Kenya
B. R. Heath
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Leadership Foundation of Washington D.C., P.O. Box 48177, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Least-squares estimates of the parameters of the Bertalanffy growth equation, adjusted for six sources of variation, were obtained for oryx, eland and zebu cattle.

Values for asymptotic weight were lower than the mature weights normally given for the species, particularly eland and cattle, owing to management constraints. The figures for females brought into the project were considered the most representative of the species in general. For this category of oryx, eland and zebu cattle respectively, the estimates were as follows: the coefficients of growth rate were 0·136, 0·112 and 0·114; asymptotic weights (W∞) were 146, 277 and 395 kg; and ages at maturity (0·98 W∞) were 33, 41 and 39 months. For females born on the project estimates of birth weights were 14·5, 24·1 and 28·7 kg; and of ages at zero weight were 3·55, 3·80 and 5·18 months prepartum, for oryx, eland and zebu cattle respectively.

When differences in size, and therefore metabolic rate were discounted, oryx grew at 3·2, eland at 3·1 and zebu cattle at 3·4 g/kg W∞0·75/day. Comparison with mean values for water turnover (ml/l0·82/day) on the same project revealed that oryx used about one third of the water required by eland and cattle, for the same amount of growth (g/kg W∞/day).

Significant sources of variation for W∞ were species, sex, and mode of entry into the project (capture or birth), all at P < 0·005. Season of birth was also significant at P < 0·01, with oryx born 2 months before a wet month achieving the largest W∞ whereas the highest average growth rate occurred when birth was 1 month before a wet month. The only significant source of variation obtained for growth rate was year of entry (P < 0·005).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 453 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertalanffy, L. Von (1960). Principles and theory of growth. In Fundamental Aspects of Normal and Malignant Growth, pp. 137–259. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Cited by Fabons (1965).Google Scholar
Brown, J. E. (1970). A comparison of five stochastic models on their ability to describe the weight-age relationship in cattle. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station. Cited by Fitzhugh (1976).Google Scholar
Brown, J. E., Fitzhugh, H. A. & Cartwrioht, T. C. (1976). A comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 42, 810–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everest, S. L. & Moule, G. R. (1952). Studies in the environment of Queensland. 2. The climatic factor in drought. Queensland Journal of Agricultural Science 9, 185.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1967). Prenatal development of uniparous animals, with particular reference to the influence of maternal nutrition in sheep. In Growth and Development of Mammals, p. 146. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Fabens, A. J. (1965). Properties and fitting of the von Bortalanffy growth curve. Growth 29, 265–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Field, C. R. (1975). Climate and the food habits of ungulates on Galana Ranch. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, V. A. & Western, D. (1977). Cattle colours in pastoral herds: natural selection or social preference? Ecology 58, 1384–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. (1976). Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shape. Journal of Animal Science 42, 1036–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, J. (1972). Growth of the African elephant (Loxodonta africana). East African Wildlife Journal 10, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1960). Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. U.S.D.A. Publication, ARS 20–8. Cited by Seebeck (1975).Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. & Hanks, J. (1975). Body growth of the impala (Aepyceros malampus)in Wankie National Park, Rhodesia. Journal of the South African Wildlife Management Association 5, 95–98.Google Scholar
King, J. M. (1979). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: field studies of the body water turnover of game and livestock. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M., Heath, B. R. & Hill, R. E. (1977). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: theory and practice. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, R. M., Parker, I. S. C. & Johnstone, R. C. B. (1975). In Elephants and their Habits, pp. 197–198. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P., Sachs, R. & Smith, A. N. S. (1967). Wildlife and food production with special reference to the semi–arid areas of the tropics and sub-tropics. World Review of Animal Production 3, 13–37.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. G. (1977). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: activity patterns of eland, oryx, buffalo and zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. G. (1978). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: shade behaviour and factors affecting the herding of eland, oryx, buffalo and zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posselt, J. (1963). The domestication of the eland. Bhodesian Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 81–87.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1975). Sysnova Reference Manual Version 7·1. Rockhampton: C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1979). Sysnova Reference Manual Version 9. Rockhampton: C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Talbot, L. M., Payne, W. J. A., Ledger, H. P., Verdcourt, L. D. & Talbot, M. H. (1965). The meat production potential of wild animals in Africa. A review of biological knowledge. Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Edinburgh, Technical Communication, No. 16.Google Scholar
Talbot, L. M. & Talbot, M. H. (1963). The wildebeest in Western Masailand, East Africa. Wildlife Monograph No. 12. Washington D.C.: Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. (1965). A relationship between mature weight and time taken to mature in mammals. Animal Production 7, 203–220.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. (1968). Genetic variation in growth and development of mammals. In Growth and Development of Mammals, pp. 267–290. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Woodhead, T. (1968). Studies of Potential Evapotranspiration in Kenya. Nairobi: East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization.Google Scholar