Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:22:22.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fruit yield and quality responses of apple cvars Gala and Fuji to partial rootzone drying under Mediterranean conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2012

D. FRANCAVIGLIA ,
V. FARINA ,
G. AVELLONE  and
R. LO BIANCO
D. FRANCAVIGLIA
Affiliation:
Dipartimento DEMETRA, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 Palermo, Italy
V. FARINA
Affiliation:
Dipartimento DEMETRA, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 Palermo, Italy
G. AVELLONE
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Molecolari e Biomolecolari, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy
R. LO BIANCO*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento DEMETRA, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Increasing irrigation efficiency is a major goal for fruit production in dry Mediterranean environments. The present study was conducted in three consecutive years (2007–09) under typical Mediterranean conditions and tested the effect of partial rootzone drying (PRD) on yield and fruit quality of two apple cultivars: Gala, with fruit maturing in summer and Fuji, with fruit maturing in autumn. Three irrigation treatments were imposed: conventional irrigation (CI), PRD (0·50 of CI water on one side of the rootzone, which was alternated periodically) and continuous deficit irrigation (DI, 0·50 of CI water on both sides of the rootzone). During the 2008 and 2009 irrigation seasons, DI reduced tree water status, and to some extent soil moisture, compared with CI and PRD. In all the years and both cultivars, DI reduced crop load by 11 and 5% over CI and PRD, respectively. In cvar Fuji, DI reduced production per tree by 9% and yield efficiency by 16% compared with CI. In all years for cvar Gala and in 2 of the 3 years for cvar Fuji, PRD and DI increased fruit soluble solid content by 5–6%, whereas PRD improved peel colour only in cvar Fuji and in 2 of the 3 years. In cvar Gala, DI fruit showed 27% more sorbitol and 55% more sucrose than PRD fruit. In both cultivars, PRD determined greater marketable yield and profit than DI. Irrigation water productivity (IWP) was increased by both PRD and DI, and in Fuji, PRD induced 18% greater IWP than DI. The different responses of the two cultivars to irrigation treatments can be attributed to differences in canopy size, crop load and mostly to the different timing of fruit growth. In particular, undergoing fast fruit growth during the irrigation period seems to induce permanent yield reductions in DI (but not PRD) trees of cvar Fuji, whereas water deficit during late fruit growth and lower crop load may have cancelled the negative effect of DI in the smaller trees of cvar Gala.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 151 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 556 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Berüter, J. & Droz, P. (1991). Studies on locating the signal for fruit abscission in the apple tree. Scientia Horticulturae 46, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspari, H. W., Einhorn, T. C., Leib, B. G., Redulla, C. A., Andrews, P. K., Lombardini, L., Auvil, T. & McFerson, J. R. (2004). Progress in the development of partial rootzone drying of apple trees. Acta Horticulturae 664, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J., Mitchell, P. D. & van Heek, L. (1981). Control of peach tree growth and productivity by regulated water supply, tree density, and summer pruning. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 106, 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE) (1976). International Lighting Vocabulary. Vienna, Austria: CIE.Google Scholar
Davies, W. J., Wilkinson, S. & Loveys, B. (2002). Stomatal control by chemical signalling and the exploitation of this mechanism to increase water use efficiency in agriculture. New Phytologist 153, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, I. C. (2009). Rhizosphere manipulations to maximize ‘crop per drop’ during deficit irrigation. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 2454–2459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, I. C., Theobald, J. C., Bacon, M. A. & Davies, W. J. (2006). Alternation of wet and dry sides during partial rootzone drying irrigation alters root-to-shoot signalling of abscisic acid. Functional Plant Biology 33, 1081–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, I. C., Egea, G. & Davies, W. J. (2008 a). ABA signalling when soil moisture is heterogeneous: decreased photoperiod sap flow from drying roots limits ABA export to the shoots. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 1263–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, I. C., Egea, G. & Davies, W. J. (2008 b). Accounting for sap flow from different parts of the root system improves the prediction of xylem ABA concentration in plants grown with heterogeneous soil moisture. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 4083–4093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dry, P. R. & Loveys, B. R. (1998). Factors influencing grapevine vigour and the potential for control with partial rootzone drying. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 4, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, P. R., Loveys, B. R., Botting, D. G. & Düring, H. (1996). Effects of partial rootzone drying on grapevine vigour, yield, composition of fruit and use of water. In Proceedings of the Ninth Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference (Eds Stockley, C. S., Sas, A. N., Johnstone, R. S. & Lee, T. H.), pp. 128–131. Adelaide: Winetitles.Google Scholar
Dry, P. R., Loveys, B. R. & Düring, H. (2000). Partial drying of the rootzone of grape. I. Transient changes in shoot growth and gas exchange. Vitis 39, 3–7.Google Scholar
Ebel, R. C., Proebsting, E. L. & Patterson, M. E. (1993). Regulated deficit irrigation may alter apple maturity, quality, and storage life. HortScience 28, 141–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebel, R. C., Proebsting, E. L. & Evans, R. G. (1995). Deficit irrigation to control vegetative growth in apple and monitoring fruit growth to schedule irrigation. HortScience 30, 1229–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, T. & Caspari, H. W. (2004). Partial rootzone drying and deficit irrigation of ‘Gala’ apples in a semi-arid climate. Acta Horticulturae 664, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallahi, E., Fallahi, B. & Shafii, B. (2008). Effect of irrigation systems and rootstocks on water use, tree growth, fruit quality and mineral nutrients in apples during the third and fourth year after planting. Acta Horticulturae 772, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fereres, E. & Soriano, M. A. (2007). Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girona, J., Behboudian, M. H., Mata, M., Del Campo, J. & Marsal, J. (2010). Exploring six reduced irrigation options under water shortage for ‘Golden Smoothee’ apple: responses of yield components over three years. Agricultural Water Management 98, 370–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowing, D. J. G., Davies, W. J. & Jones, H. G. (1990). A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malus domestica Borkh. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1535–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilili, A. W., Behboudian, M. H. & Mills, T. M. (1996). Composition and quality of ‘Braeburn’ apples under reduced irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae 67, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudoyarova, G. R., Vysotskaya, L. B., Cherkozyanova, A. & Dodd, I. C. (2007). Effect of partial rootzone drying on the concentration of zeatin-type cytokinins in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) xylem sap and leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, A. & Ryan, K. G. (1994). Vascular development and sap flow in apple pedicels. Annals of Botany 74, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leib, B. G., Caspari, H. W., Redulla, C. A., Andrews, P. K. & Jabro, J. J. (2006). Partial rootzone drying and deficit irrigation of ‘Fuji’ apples in semi-arid climate. Irrigation Science 24, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, R. & Francaviglia, D. (2012). Comparative responses of ‘Gala’ and ‘Fuji’ apple trees to deficit irrigation: Placement versus volume effects. Plant and Soil 357, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, R., Talluto, G. & Farina, V. (2012). Effects of partial rootzone drying and rootstock vigour on dry matter partitioning of apple trees (Malus domestica cvar Pink Lady). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 150, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardini, L., Caspari, H. W., Elfving, D. C., Auvil, T. D. & McFerson, J. R. (2004). Gas exchange and water relations in ‘Fuji’ apple trees grown under deficit irrigation. Acta Horticulturae 636, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lötter, J.de, V., Beukes, D. J. & Weber, H. W. (1985). Growth and quality of apples as affected by different irrigation treatments. Journal of Horticultural Science 60, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, T. M., Behboudian, M. H. & Clothier, B. E. (1997). The diurnal and seasonal water relations, and composition, of ‘Braeburn’ apple fruit under reduced plant water status. Plant Science 126, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, P. D. & Chalmers, D. J. (1982). The effect of reduced water supply on peach tree growth and yields. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 107, 853–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mpelasoka, B. S., Behboudian, M. H. & Green, S. R. (2001). Water use, yield and fruit quality of lysimeter-grown apple trees, responses to deficit irrigation and to crop load. Irrigation Science 20, 107–113.Google Scholar
Naor, A., Naschitz, S., Peres, M. & Gal, Y. (2008). Responses of apple fruit size to tree water status and crop load. Tree Physiology 28, 1255–1261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connell, M. G. & Goodwin, I. (2007). Responses of ‘Pink Lady’ apple to deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying: physiology, growth, yield, and fruit quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, D. B. B. (1974). Some effects of water stress in late spring on apple trees. Journal of Horticultural Science 49, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas-Escudero, E., Alarcón-Jiménez, A. L., Elizalde-Galván, P. & Rojo-Callejas, F. (2004). Optimization of carbohydrate silylation for gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1027, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, P., Dodd, I. C. & Martinez-Cutillas, A. (2012). Contrasting physiological effects of partial root zone drying in field-grown grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Monastrell) according to total soil water availability. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 4071–4083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadras, V. O. (2009). Does partial root-zone drying improve irrigation water productivity in the field? A meta-analysis. Irrigation Science 27, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, M., Loveys, B. & Dry, P. (2000). Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1627–1634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, Y., Kanayama, Y. & Yamaki, S. (1996). Occurrence of two sucrose synthase isozymes during maturation of Japanese pear fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121, 943–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talluto, G., Farina, V. & Lo Bianco, R. (2007). Growth, fruit yield and quality of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees under fixed partial rootzone drying. Journal of Applied Horticulture 9, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talluto, G., Farina, V., Volpe, G. & Lo Bianco, R. (2008). Effects of partial rootzone drying and rootstock vigour on growth and fruit quality of ‘Pink Lady’ apple trees in Mediterranean environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 785–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hooijdonk, B. M., Dorji, K. & Behboudian, M. H. (2004). Responses of ‘Pacific Rose’™ apple to partial rootzone drying and to deficit irrigation. European Journal of Horticultural Science 69, 104–110.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, H., Kanayama, Y., Soejima, J. & Yamaki, S. (1996). Changes in the amounts of the NAD-dependent sorbitol dehydrogenase and its involvement in the development of apple fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121, 848–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaki, S. & Ishikawa, K. (1986). Roles of four sorbitol-related enzymes and invertase in the seasonal alteration of sugar metabolism in apple tissue. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 111, 134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegbe, J. A. & Behboudian, M. H. (2008). Plant water status, CO2 assimilation, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Pacific Rose™’ apple under partial rootzone drying. Advances in Horticultural Science 22, 27–32.Google Scholar
Zegbe, J. A. & Serna-Pérez, A. (2011). Partial rootzone drying maintains fruit quality of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples at harvest and postharvest. Scientia Horticulturae 127, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L. Y., Peng, Y. B., Pelleschi-Travier, S., Fan, Y., Lu, Y. F., Lu, Y. M., Gao, X. P., Shen, Y. Y., Delrot, S. & Zhang, D. P. (2004). Evidence for apoplasmic phloem unloading in developing apple fruit. Plant Physiology 135, 574–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed