Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:01:29.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formic acid as a silage additive for wet crops of cocksfoot and lucerne

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. F. Wilson  and
R. J. Wilkins
R. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
R. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Crops of lucerne and cocksfoot of high moisture content were ensiled without additive and with the addition of formic acid at up to 0·91% of the fresh crop weight in test-tube silos and in silos containing about one tonne of crop. Silages from the larger silos were fed to sheep for measurement of voluntary intake and digestibility.

Silages made without formic acid were badly preserved and contained large quantities of acetic acid, butyric acid and ammonia. The addition of formic acid reduced the production of acids and ammonia. With test-tube silos differences between the minimum pH measured during the storage period and the final pH after 155 days were not significant for silages made from both crops with addition of 0·45% or more of formic acid: these silages were considered to be stable.

Silages from the larger silos were generally not as well preserved as those from the test-tube silos, particularly at the higher levels of formic acid application. This difference was attributed to less effective application of additive to the larger silos and loss of formic acid in the effluent which was released from these silos but not from the test-tubes. Organic matter intake increased with increase in formic acid level, but organic matter digestibility was not significantly correlated with formic acid levels. Intake was closely related to the quantity of ammonia in the silage and it is argued that formic acid affected intake by influencing the pattern of fermentation in the silo rather than by a direct effect of formic acid itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 1973 , pp. 225 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1905). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 10th edn.Washington: Ass. Off. Agric. Chem.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 790–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. & Gibson, Q. H. (1954). The estimation of lactic acid using cerie sulphate. Biochem. J. 58, 154–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A. R. & McDonald, P. (1971). Effect of formic acid on the fermentation of grass of low dry matter content. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 22, 157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. J. & Clifton, C. M. (1965). Relation of dry matter content in ensiled material and other factors to nutrient losses by seepage. J. Dairy Sci. 48, 917–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumark, H., Bondi, A. & Volcani, R. (1964). Amines, aldehydes and keto acids in silages and their effect on feed intake by ruminants. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15, 487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playne, M. J. & McDonald, P. (1966). The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. J Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 264–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saue, O. & Breikem, K. (1969). Comparison of formic acid silage with other silages and dried grassland products in feeding experiments. Proc. 3rd Gen. Meet. European Qrassld Fed., Braunschweig, pp. 282–4.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Paulsen, G. M. & Raguse, C. A. (1964). Extraction of total available carbohydrates from grass and legume tissue. Pl. Physiol., Lancaster 39, 960–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldo, D. R., Smith, L. W., Miller, R. W. & Moore, L. A. (1969). Growth, intake and digestibility from formic acid silage versus hay. J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1609–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieringa, G. W. (1958). The effect of wilting on butyric acid fermentation in silage. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 6, 204–10.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1969) A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1968, p. 69.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1970). A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1969, p. 84.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. & Harris, C. E. (1971). The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. I. Inter-relationships between silage composition and intake. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 531–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1972). An evaluation of laboratory ensiling techniques. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 23, 377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, H. G. & Irvin, H. N. (1957). The determination of organic acids in silage. J. agric. Fd Chem. 5, 213–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar