Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T23:59:10.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The food capacity of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Alan Murray
J. Alan Murray
Affiliation:
University of Reading.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the purposes of this article the “food capacity” is taken to be the amount of total dry matter consumed when the animal is offered as much as it cares to eat. This has been estimated from the results of a variety of experiments collected by the author for the purpose.

The evidence quoted shows that the food capacity of steers is subject to a nearly uniform acceleration of 40 lb. per month per month from birth up to the age of 12 or 14 months, after which it remains approximately constant. It cannot therefore bear any simple relation to the live weight of the animal.

In the case of steers the average constant rate of consumption was about 18 lb. of total dry matter, per head, per day, throughout the period from 1 to 4 years of age; in the case of milk cows it is probably about twice as great, viz. from 30 to 40 lb.

The food capacity of steers has been much exaggerated by various scientific writers. In Kellner's tables it seems to be implied that the capacity varies as the live weight and that it may be as much as 64 lb. per head per day, i.e. 3½ times as much as was found in the experiments under review.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1926 , pp. 574 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Armsby, (1917). Nutrition of Farm Animals, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Armsby, and Fries, (1917). Influence of the Degree of Fatness of Cattle upon their Utilisation of Feed. Journ. Agric. Res. 11, 10.Google Scholar
3Armsby, and Fries, (1918). Net Energy Value of Alfalfa Hay and Starch. Journ. Agric. Res. 15, 5.Google Scholar
4Atwater, and Phelps, (1900). Feeds and Feeding (Henry), Madison, Wis.Google Scholar
5Eckles, and Palmer, (1916). Influence of Plane of Nutrition of the Cow upon the Composition and Properties of Milk. Agric. Exp. Sta. Univ. Mo. Res. Bul. 24.Google Scholar
6Haecker, (1920). Investigations in Beef Production. Agric. Exp. Sta. Univ. Min. Bul. 193.Google Scholar
7Haecker, (1920). Investigations in Beef Production. Agric. Exp. Sta. Univ. Min. Bul. 193.Google Scholar
8Haecker, (1920). Investigations in Beef Production. Agric. Exp. Sta. Univ. Min. Bul. 193.Google Scholar
9Henry, and Morrison, (1923). Feeds and Feeding, Madison.Google Scholar
10Kellner, (1912). Die Ernährung der landwirtschaftlichen Nutztiere. Berlin.Google Scholar
11Lawes, and Gilbert., Rothamsted Memoirs, 4.Google Scholar
12Moulton, Trowbridge and Hatch, (1921). Changes in Form and Weight on Different Planes of Nutrition. Agric. Exp. Sta. Univ. Missouri Bul. 43.Google Scholar
13Wood, (1924). Animal Nutrition, London.Google Scholar
14Woll, (1900). Feeds and Feeding (Henry), Madison, Wis.Google Scholar