Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T20:16:24.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flowering and pod and seed development in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. O. Togun  and
T. O. Tayo
A. O. Togun
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
T. O. Tayo
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Flower, pod and seed development were studied in the cultivars Cita-1 and Cita-2 in two field trials in 1985–86, in Ibadan, Nigeria. Flowering within any inflorescence was acropetal. On each plant the terminal inflorescence was the first to flower and, generally, inflorescences developed basipetally. A total of 569 flowers (mean of five plants) opened on Cita-1; of these, 20 were on the terminal inflorescence, 130 on axillary inflorescences and 419 on inflorescences on primary branches. For the 605 flowers (mean of five plants) which opened on Cita-2, the distribution was 19, 161 and 425, respectively.On Cita-1, 158 pods formed on average, of which 7 were on the terminal inflorescence, 33 on axillary inflorescences and 118 on inflorescences on primary branches lower down the plant. On Cita-2, for the 185 pods counted at maturity, the distribution was 8, 43 and 134, respectively. Some 72 and 69% of the total number of flowers which opened on Cita-1 and Cita-2, respectively, were aborted. In both cultivars, 99% of the mature pods were formed from flowers which opened within 24 days of the start of anthesis; the number of pods retained largely determined seed yield. The inflorescences which developed on the primary branches contributed 70% (Cita-1) and 66% (Cita-2) of the total seed yield. Early-formed pods were heavier than those formed later. Individual pods attained physiological maturity 35–42 days after successful pollination of the flower. At physiological maturity of the pod, the seed contained 3·72 % N, 0·45% P and 2·76% K, and the husk contained 1·98% N, 0·16% P and 1·96% K. The majority of open flowers which aborted were produced on primary branches, indicating that the primary branches have the greatest potential for increasing seed yield. A shorter flowering period might ensure greater retention of open flowers.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 327 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Manohar, M. S. & Sachan, S. C. (1975). Pod development and germination studies on pea (Pisum sativum L.). Vegetable Science 1, 22–30.Google Scholar
Neumann, P. M. (1982). Late season foliar fertilization with macro nutrients: is there a theoretical basis for increased seed yield? Journal of Plant Nutrition 5, 1209–1215.Google Scholar
Ojehomon, O. O. (1968). Flowering, fruit production and abscission in cowpea Vigna unguiculala (L.) Walp. Journal of the West African Science Association 13, 227–234.Google Scholar
Ojehomon, O. O. (1970). Effect of continuous removal of open flowers on the seed yield of two varieties of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 363–374.Google Scholar
Savithri, K. S., Ganapathy, K. S. P. S. & Sinha, S. K. (1978). Fruit and seed development in mung beans (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaik, P. H. & Probst, A. H. (1958 a). The inheritance of inflorescence type, peduncle length, flower per node and percent flower shedding in soyabeans. Agronomy Journal 50, 98–102.Google Scholar
Schaik, P. H. & Probst, A. H. (1958 b). Effects of some environmental factors on flower production and reproductive efficiency in soyabeans. Agronomy Journal 50, 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, A. R. & Narayanan, A. (1979). Comparisons of earlier and later-formed pods of pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Annals of Botany 43, 459–466.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, A. R., Narayanan, A. & Venkataratnam, N. (1979). The effect of flower removal on the seed yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Annals of Applied Biology 91, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & De Wit, C. T. (1975). Comparative analysis of photosynthate and nitrogen requirements in the production of seeds by various crops. Science 189, 565–567.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K. (1974). Yield of grain legumes: problems and prospects. Indian Journal of Genetics 34A, 988–994.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1980). Compensatory growth and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) following pod removal at different stages of reproductive growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 487–491.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1986). Flower and pod production at various nodes of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 29–36.Google Scholar