Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:24:10.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flocculation of soils. II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Norman M. Comber
Norman M. Comber
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Leeds.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three types of mechanism whereby clay is flocculated by electrolytes, are discussed.

1. Normal or direct flocculation the mechanism of which is precisely that by which electrolytes coagulate electro-negative suspensoids. The isoelectric point theory of such flocculation is assumed in this paper. Experimental evidence is brought forward to show that iron and aluminium salts behave in this “normal” way.

2. Indirect flocculation which takes place whenever the electrolyte reacts with the clay and thereby brings into solution from the clay other substances which cause flocculation. The action of some neutral salts and of acids is regarded as being largely indirect.

3. Abnormal flocculation which is the result of a reaction between the added flocculant and the emulsoid surface of the clay particle. The action of calcium hydroxide is placed under this heading for reasons set forth in the earlier paper.

Because of its obvious bearing on important agricultural operations, the action of calcium hydroxide on clay is considered more fully. The following are the salient points of that consideration:

(i) Although it is reversible to carbonic acid the flocculation of clay by calcium hydroxide is not due to the formation of calcium carbonate. Several experimental results are set forth to show this, the chief is that barium and calcium hydroxides behave quite differently to carbonate and carbonic acid, and alike to clay.

(ii) The action of calcium hydroxide on clay is an action on an “emulsoid gel surface” and not an action on a sol present in gross amount.

(iii) The hydroxyl ion may perform at least two functions in its cooperation with the calcium ion in the flocculation of clay: (a) when added with or after the calcium ion it produces the alkalinity necessary for the reaction between calcium compounds and silica, etc., as discussed in the earlier paper; (b) when added before the calcium ion it not only produces this alkalinity but also peptizes the clay with the production of a greater amount of the emulsoid surface and a consequent increase in the rapidity of flocculation and the volume of the coagulum.

(iv) Critical mixtures of clay and silt—in which neither wholly dominates the system—can be obtained by decantation at an appropriate time during the sedimentation of soil suspensions. It is shown experimentally that when the clay of such mixtures is flocculated more rapidly than the silt, the silt then becomes dominant; and that when the silt is flocculated, more rapidly than the clay, the clay then becomes dominant.

(v) The different behaviour of “clay” and of “silt” to calcium hydroxide is not regarded as due to any essential difference in the structure cf these particles but as being determined by the ratio of the emulsoid surface to the core of the particle. In clay the surface dominates the system, in silt the core dominates the system.

(vi) In very low concentrations the hydroxyl ion appears to behave normally and to militate against the flocculation of clay by calcium salts.

(vii) Organic emulsoids may, in ordinary soils, be partly responsible for the anomalous action of calcium hydroxide on clay, but it is shown that calcium hydroxide exhibits that anomalous action on a deep subsoil clay containing no organic matter.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 1921 , pp. 450 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 450 Note 1 Comber, , Journ. Agric. Sci. 10 (4), 1920.Google Scholar

page 450 Note 2 See Keen, , Journ. Agric. Sci. 10 (1), 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 456 Note 1 The whole of the experiments recorded in section C, as well as some others, have since been repeated with other soils by Mr G. Walsh, student in the University of Leeds, who is investigating some of the possible practical applications of these studies. Mr Walsh's results entirely confirm those recorded here.

page 459 Note 1 Quoted in Burton, , The Physical Properties of Colloidal Solutions, 1916.Google Scholar

page 459 Note 2 Regarding the reactivity of kaolin see Sullivan, , U.S. Geol. Sur. Bull. No. 312, 1907.Google Scholar

page 459 Note 3 Jahrb. Mineral. 1893, 2.Google Scholar

page 459 Note 4 Hall, and Morison, , Journ. Agric. Sci. 2, 1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 461 Note 1 See Russell, and Appleyard, , Journ. Agric. Sci. 7 (1), 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 462 Note 1 Comber, Trans. Faraday Soc. 17, 1921.Google Scholar

page 463 Note 1 Le Chatelier, , La Silice et les silicates, 1914.Google Scholar

page 463 Note 1 Cited from Burton, , The Physical Properties of Colloidal Solutions, 1916.Google Scholar

page 465 Note 1 Pickering, S. U., Proc. Roy. Soc. 94 (A), 1918.Google Scholar

page 465 Note 2 Trans. Faraday Soc. 17, 1921.Google Scholar

page 468 Note 1 It will be clear that a gel surface may be great or small without material alteratio n in the diameter of the particle.

page 468 Note 2 Hall, and Russell, , “Soil Surveys and Soil Analysis,” Journ. Agric. Sci. 4, 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar