Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:52:11.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field testing of six decision support systems for scheduling fungicide applications to control Mycosphaerella graminicola on winter wheat crops in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2008

J. J. BURKE  and
B. DUNNE
J. J. BURKE
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Crop Protection and Breeding Department, Oak Park, Co. Carlow, Ireland
B. DUNNE*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Crop Protection and Breeding Department, Oak Park, Co. Carlow, Ireland
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were conducted between 2003 and 2005 to compare the efficacy of five interactive decision support systems (DSSs) (DESSAC, PLANT-Plus, proPLANT Expert, CerDis and Crop Protection Online (CPO)) and an in-crop system (Septoria Timer) to schedule fungicide applications to winter wheat cultivars (Madrigal and Claire) for the control of Mycosphaerella graminicola. The effectiveness of the crop management programmes proposed by the DSSs was compared with that of standard 2-spray programmes applied at GS 37 and 65 and 3-spray programmes applied at GS 32, 39 and 65. Compared with the 3-spray programme, the programme scheduled by CPO advised application of the least active ingredient to the six trials over three seasons, while together with the Septoria Timer it also advised the least number of applications (average 2·3 per crop). The PLANT-Plus system advised the highest input of active ingredient and the highest number of applications (average of 4·0 per crop). The interactive DSSs responded to cultivar susceptibility to M. graminicola by scheduling more applications to the susceptible cv. Madrigal compared with the moderately resistant cv. Claire. Whether control of M. graminicola is expressed as reduction in the proportion of necrosis per leaf or a reduction of the area under the disease progress curve, the 3-spray programme provided the most effective control. The Septoria Timer provided a similar level of control. For the remaining programmes, the effectiveness of control varied with observation date, leaf and cultivar. The 2-spray programme provided the least successful control. Fungicide application significantly increased grain yield each season. The fungicide scheduling programme that provided the highest grain yield varied by cultivar and season. Grain specific weight was enhanced by fungicide application compared with the untreated control, except for cv. Claire in 2004. The fungicide scheduling programme that provided the highest specific weight varied with cultivar and season. The highest average margin over fungicide cost was provided by the Septoria Timer.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 146 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 415 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1972). Guide for the Assessment of Cereal Diseases. UK: ADAS.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2002). Winter Cereal Varieties, Irish Recommended List. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Agriculture and Food.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2006). Wheat Disease Management Guide. London, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Bouma, E. (2003). Decision support systems used in the Netherlands for reduction in the input of active substances in agriculture. EPPO/OEPP Bulletin 33, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D. H. (1998). Decision Support System for Arable Crops (DESSAC): an integrated approach to decision support. In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Pests and Diseases, pp. 239–246. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Chungu, C., Gilbert, J. & Townley-Smith, F. (2001). Septoria tritici blotch development as affected by temperature, duration of leaf wetness, inoculum concentration and host. Plant Disease 85, 430–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, J. (2003). A New Indicator to Reflect the Relationship between Use and Need of Pesticides. Pesticide Forum Paper PF 133. Boxworth, UK: ADAS.Google Scholar
Cook, R. J. (1977). Effect of timed fungicide sprays on yield of winter wheat in relation to Septoria infection periods. Plant Pathology 26, 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. J., Hims, M. J. & Vaughan, T. B. (1999). Effects of fungicide spray timing on winter wheat disease control. Plant Pathology 48, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, B. (2004). Disease control strategies for cereals. In Proceedings of the National Tillage Conference 2004. Crops Research Centre, Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland, 28 January 2004, pp. 79–89. Carlow, Ireland: Crops Research Centre.Google Scholar
Dimmock, J. P. R. E. & Gooding, M. J. (2002). The effects of fungicides on rate and duration of grain filling in winter wheat in relation to maintenance of flag leaf green area. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138, 1–16.Google Scholar
Fry, W. E. (1978). Quantification of general resistance of potato cultivars and fungicide effects for integrated control of potato late blight. Phytopathology 68, 1650–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, M. J., Dimmock, J. P. R. E., France, J. & Jones, S. A. (2000). Green leaf area decline of wheat flag leaves: the influence of fungicides and relationships with mean grain weight and grain yield. Annals of Applied Biology 136, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, N. V., Jones, D. R. & Slough, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting diseases of winter wheat in England and Wales, 1989–98. Plant Pathology 50, 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, N. V., Turner, J. A., Slough, J. E., Elcock, S. J., Jones, D. R. & Gladders, P. (2002). Oilseed rape and cereal diseases – how are farmers responding to their control? In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases, pp. 903–911. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Hims, M. J. & Cook, R. J. (1991). The use of rainfall and accumulated mean temperature to indicate fungicide activity in the control of leaf diseases of winter wheat in the UK. EPPO/OEPP Bulletin 21, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, V. W. L., Hunter, T., Fielding, E. C., Stinchombe, G. R., Hutcheon, J. A., Rooney, J. M., Huxley, M. W. & Clay, D. V. (1986). Controlling diseases. In Report of the Long Ashton Research Station 1986, pp. 27–29. UK: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, L. N. (2001). Good plant protection practice – status and future. EPPO/OEPP Bulletin 32, 367–369.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, L. N. & Hagelskjaer, L. (2003). Comparative field trials of various decision support systems for cereal disease control. In Proceedings of the Crop Protection Conference for the Baltic Sea Region, 28–29 April 2003, Poznan, Poland. DIAS Report Plant Production No. 96 (Ed. Wolffhechel, H.), pp. 114–122. Tjele, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Newe, M., Meier, H., Johnen, A. & Volk, T. (2003). proPLANT expert.com – an online consultation system on crop protection in cereals, rape, potatoes and sugar beet. EPPO/OEPP Bulletin 33, 443–449.Google Scholar
Parker, S. R., Lovell, D. J. & Royle, D. J. (1997). The importance of accurate risk prediction for reliable control of Septoria tritici leaf blotch in winter wheat. Aspects of Applied Biology 48, 143–150.Google Scholar
Pietravalle, S., Shaw, M. W., Parker, S. R. & van den Bosch, F. (2003). Modeling of relationships between weather and Septoria tritici epidemics on winter wheat. A critical approach. Phytopathology 93, 1329–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raatjes, P., Hadders, J., Martin, D. & Hinds, H. (2003). PLANT-Plus: Turn-key solutions for disease forecasting and irrigation management. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Potato Modelling Conference Physiology Section, EAPR, Dundee, 3–5 March 2003 (Eds MacKerron, D. K. L. & Haverkort, A. J.), pp. 168–183. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. W. & Royle, D. J. (1993). Factors determining the severity of epidemics of Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici) on winter wheat in the UK. Plant Pathology 42, 882–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secher, B. J. M., Jørgensen, L. N., Murali, N. S. & Boll, P. S. (1995). Field validation of decision support system for the control of pests and diseases in cereals in Denmark. Pesticide Science 45, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verreet, J. A., Klink, H. & Hoffmann, G. M. (2000). Regional monitoring for disease prediction and optimization of plant protection measures: the IPM wheat model. Plant Disease 84, 816–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar