Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:38:43.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fibre medullation in Blackface lambs and hoggs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Pilkington  and
A. F. Purser
J. M. Pilkington
Affiliation:
A.R.C., Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh
A. F. Purser
Affiliation:
A.R.C., Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A method has been described of assessing the average degree of medullation in fleece samples. This method combines information about the various fibre types and the proportion of each present in the sample, by assigning 100 fibres to classes with scores 1–5 according to the degree of medullation. A weighted mean score was determined, ten times this mean being defined as the ‘medullation index’. The index has been used for 2 years on samples taken from 2-month-old lambs and 14-month-old hoggs of the Blackface breed. Drawings of fibre types showed that the internal and external diameters and their ratio all increase with the score.

The mean medullation index for the 2-month-old lambs in the 2 years was 25·6 and 24·8. The effects of sex and type of birth of lamb and age of dam were assessed by fitting constants, but their contribution to the total variance was very small. The regression of medullation on age of lamb when sampled was −0·11 units per day in both years, and was highly significant. Possible explanations for this decline of medullation are discussed.

The mean medullation index for 14-month-old hoggs was 16·1 in both years. Estimate of correlation between lamb and hogg for the 2 years were + 0·45 and + 0·33. It is probable that variation in medullation within the fleece and in fibre shedding account for these low values.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1958 , pp. 257 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burns, M. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 14, 353.Google Scholar
Grandstaff, J. O. & Wolf, H. W. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. I. (1935). Text. Res. J. 5, 84.Google Scholar
Pohle, E. M., Keller, H. R. & Hazel, L. N. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skårman, S. (1944). K. Lantbr Akad. Handl., Stockh. Nr. 2–3½ Specialhäfte 7.Google Scholar