Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:47:28.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertility levels of bulls kept at an artificial insemination centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. J. Cembrowicz
H. J. Cembrowicz
Affiliation:
Somerset Cattle Breeding Centre, Ilminster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present method of estimating preliminary results in artificial insemination practice bears a definite relation to calving percentages, and, with few exceptions, may be generally adopted as a true measure of fertility.

Single factors, such as an individual bull with a low conception rate, a new and less efficient inseminator, or variations in the results obtained at the Sub-Centres, etc., do not noticeably affect the average monthly conception rate in a large A.I. Centre. The most important influencing factors have been found to be the choice of diluent, and in some cases the elimination of the use of stored semen.

No significant variation in fertility occurs with the season of the year, the age of the bull or the area of operation; but, for a bull to work satisfactorily at a centre and at the same time achieve good results, it is necessary that he should be treated as an individual and his psychology closely studied.

In view of results obtained, one is able to conclude that methods of evaluation at present in use (estimating initial motility, density, percentage of abnormals and a test of viability by storage of diluted and undiluted samples) are up to a point satisfactory.

A dilutor or buffer may influence the conception rate considerably, and it is felt that the diluent in use at present has its own fertility level.

With the Centre's team of forty-eight bulls it is obvious that there must be some variation in fertility levels between individuals; but it is seen that, whereas bulls in natural service fall obviously into categories of ‘high fertility’ or ‘low fertility’, this division tends to disappear in A.I. with the application of the various techniques.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 1952 , pp. 323 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1945). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonadonna, T. & Franecshi, L. (1946). Zootec e Veterinaria (Milan), no. 1.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. (1949). Vet. Rec. 61, 861.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1927). The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, A. F. (1949). Int. Vet. Congress, London.Google Scholar
Mercier, E. & Salisbury, G. W. (1947 a). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, E. & Salisbury, G. W. (1947 b). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1950). Production Division Report.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. W. & Vandemark, N. L. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. (1949). Int. Vet. Congress, London.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. L., Melrose, D. R. & Wilson, W. R. (1951). Vet. Rec, 63, 609.Google Scholar