Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:08:08.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the proportions of cross-bred and selfed seed obtained from field bean (Vicia faba L.) crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Bond  and
M. Pope
D. A. Bond
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
M. Pope
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Winter bean crops, mainly of the variety Throws MS, were surveyed for proportions of cross-bred seed, using hilum colour as a genetic marker. In 1971 a significantly greater proportion of cross-breds was detected in random samples taken from the centre than in similar samples from the border of three fields and from the total of all seven fields. An hypothesis is proposed that pod setting at the centre was limited more than at the border by a factor such as plant competition and chocolate spot at a time when selfing was enforced due to a general lack of bee visitation, or else inbred embryos aborted more under the stress of disease in the centre. No differences between centre and border were found in 1972 except for a greater proportion of cross-breds from the border of a Maris Beagle field and this only applied to parent plants of certain genotypes.

Significant differences were also found between fields and between seasons. There was a significant regression of percentage selfing on field size but there was no evidence that bees failed to penetrate to the centre of large fields.

Implications for variety development, testing and purity are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 343 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bond, D. A. (1966). Yield and components of yield in diallel crosses between inbred lines of winter beans (Vicia faba). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 235–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drayner, J. M. (1959). Self- and cross fertility in field beans (Vicia faba Linn.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 53, 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, J. L. (1954). Plant breeding studies in leguminous forage crops. II. Further observations on natural cross-breeding in winter beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 45, 141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, J. L. & Bailey, N. T. J. (1951). Plant breeding studies in leguminous forage crops. I. Natural cross breeding in winter beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 41, 371–8.Google Scholar
Hanna, A. S. & Lawes, D. A. (1967). Studies on pollination and fertilization in the field bean (Vicia faba L.). Annals of Applied Biology 59, 289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebblethwaite, P. D. (1970). What makes beans so unreliable? Arable Fanner, 08 1970.Google Scholar
Holden, J. H. W. & Bond, D. A. (1960). Studies on the breeding system of the field bean (Vicia faba L.). Heredity 15, 175–92.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M. W., Hurst, R. L., Levin, M. D. & Stoker, G. L. (1969). Computer analysis of the genetic contamination of alfalfa seed. Crop Science 9, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, J. (1960). Données sur l'amélioration de la féverole de printemps. Vicia faba L. Annales de l' Amélioration des Plantes 1960, II, 121–3.Google Scholar
Sjodin, J. (1971). Induced morphological variation in Vicia faba L. Hereditas 67, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar