Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:21:00.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the intake and digestion of roughage by sheep fed maize straw supplemented with maize grain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Penelope A. Henning ,
Yvonne Van Der Linden ,
Mary E. Mattheyse ,
Wilfried K. Nauhaus ,
Helen M. Schwartz  and
Frances M. C. Gilchrist
Penelope A. Henning
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa
Yvonne Van Der Linden
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa
Mary E. Mattheyse
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa
Wilfried K. Nauhaus
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa
Helen M. Schwartz
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa
Frances M. C. Gilchrist
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort, 0110, Republic of South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

After a preliminary period in which they were all fed maize straw plus a proteinmineral supplement, 18 Merino wethers were divided into six groups and fed straw, proteins and minerals as before, plug pellets containing maize grain so that these constituted 0, 78, 156, 235, 313 and 393 g/kg of the total daily intake.

The diets provided sufficient protein so that NH3 and branched-chain volatile fatty acids were not limiting for growth of the fibre-digesting bacteria in the rumen.

The intake of straw, the digestibility of cellulose and hemicellulose, and the mass of cellulose and hemicellulose digested per day declined linearly as the proportion of pellets in the diet increased above 78 g/kg. This decline was not related to the pH of the ruminal contents which was unaffected by the feeding of up to and including 235g pellets/kg diet, and which, with one exception, was only 2–6 pH-hours below pH 6 when more grain was fed.

As the proportion of pellets in the diet increased the number of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen declined to an extent which correlated well with the decrease in mass of cellulose digested per day. There was no change in the relative proportions of the predominant genera.

There was no decrease in the number of xylanolytic bacteria in the rumen as more pellets were fed, but there was an indication of a change in the predominant genera producing diffusible xylanases.

It is concluded that some factor, in addition to nutrient limitation and pH, may play a role in the decrease in intake and digestion of roughage when starch is fed. It is suggested that starch or sugars derived from it may per se inhibit the synthesis and/or activity of the rumen cellulases and hemicellulases.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 565 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, R. P., Escuder-Volente, J., Curran, M. K. & Holmes, W. (1972). The influence of supplements of energy and protein on the intake and performance of cattle fed on cereal straws. Animal Production1 15, 167–176.Google Scholar
Berg, B. (1975). Cellulase location in Cellvibrio fulvus. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 21, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, B. (1978). Cellulose degradation and cellulase formation by Phialophora malorum. Archives of Microbiology 118, 61–65.Google Scholar
Blaxteb, K. L. & Wilson, R. S. (1963). The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Animal Production 5, 27–42.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. P. (1973). Nutritional requirements of the predominant rumen cellulolytic bacteria. Federation Proceedings 32, 1809–1813.Google ScholarPubMed
Burroughs, W., Gerlaugh, P., Edginton, B. H. & Bethke, R. M. (1949). The influence of corn starch on roughage digestion in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 8, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Murdoch, J. C. (1966). The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughages by cows. Animal Production 33, 1–11.Google Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 15–23.Google Scholar
Dehority, B. A., Scott, H. W. & Kowaluk, P. (1967). Volatile fatty acid requirements of cellulolytic rumen, bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 94, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. British, Journal of Nutrition 18, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1977). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. 3. Relationships between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. (1967 a). Voluntary intake of low-protein diets by ruminants. 1. Intake of food by cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 375–382.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. (1967 b). Voluntary intake of lowprotein diets by ruminants. 2. Intake of food by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Huston, J. E. (1968). 144Ce-144Pr as a partioulate digesta flow marker in ruminants. Journal of Nutrition 95, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Shazly, K., Dehority, B. A., & Johnson, R. R. (1961). Effect of starch on the digestion of cellulose in vitro and in vivo by rumen micro-organisms. Journal of Animal Science 20, 268–273.Google Scholar
Fusee, M. C. & Leatherwood, J. M. (1972). Regulation of cellulase from Ruminococcus. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 18, 347–353.Google Scholar
Gaillard, B. D. E. & Van't Klooster, A. T. (1973). Observations on the fermentation of carbohydrates along the gastro-intestinal tract of a fistulated cow. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 21, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, E. J., Moore, J. E., Fbanke, D. E. & Ruelke, O. C. (1976). Formulation of hay-grain diets for ruminants. 2. Depression in voluntary intake of different quality forages by limited grain in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 42, 717–723.Google Scholar
Haqedorn, H. C. & Jensen, B. N. (1923). Zur Mikro-bestimmung des Blutzucker mittels Ferricyanid. Biochemische Zeitschrift 135, 46–58.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. S. (1942). The effect of added glucose upon the digestibility of protein and of fibre in rations for sheep. Journal of Nutrition 23, 101—110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. (1953). The effect of quality and quantity of carbohydrate and protein in the ration of the sheep on the digestibility of cellulose and other constituents of the ration, with a note on the effect of adding vitamins of the B-complex on the digestibility and retention of the nutrients of a hay ration. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 43, 281–293.Google Scholar
Henning, P. A. (1979). Examination of methods for enumerating hemicellulose-utilizing bacteria in the rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 38, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kistner, A. (1960). An improved method for viable counts of bacteria of the ovine rumen which ferment carbohydrates. Journal of Oeneral Microbiology 23, 565–576.Google ScholarPubMed
Leaver, J. D. (1973). Rearing of dairy cattle. 4. Effect of concentrate supplementation on the liveweight gain and feed intake of calves offered roughages ad libitum. Animal Production 17, 43–52.Google Scholar
Mackie, R. I. (1977). The ruminal metabolism of lactic acid. Thesis, University of Natal, p. 61.Google Scholar
Mackie, R. I., Gilohrist, F. M. C., Robberts, A. M., Hannah, P. E. & Schwartz, H. M. (1978). Microbiological and chemical changes in the rumen during the stepwise adaptation of sheep to high concentrate diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 241–254.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z., Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1977). Rates of rumen fermentation in relation to ammonia concentration. British Journal of Nutrition 38, 437–443.Google Scholar
Mercer, J. R. & Annison, E. F. (1976). Utilization of nitrogen in ruminants. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Boorman, K. N., Buttery, P. J., Lewis, D., Neale, R. J. and Swan, H.), pp. 397–416. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Mulholland, J. G., Coombe, J. B. & McManus, W. R. (1976). Effect of starch on the utilization by sheep of a straw diet supplemented with urea and minerals. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noll, F. (1974). L-lactate. Determination with LDH, GPT and NAD. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (ed. Bergmeyer, H. V. and Gawehn, K.) pp. 1475–1479. New York: Academic Press. 2nd English edition.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Frazeb, C. (1975). The effect of processing barley-based supplements on rumen pH, rate of digestion and voluntary intake of dried grass in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 34, 493–500.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Soliman, H. S. & MaoDearmid, A. (1978). Intake of hay by cattle given supplements of barley subjected to various forms of physical treatment or treatment with alkali. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 611–615.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. & Outen, G. E. (1970). Some effects of feeding supplements of maize meal and sodium bicarbonate upon the digestion of forage cellulose by sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 29, 12–13 A.Google ScholarPubMed
Raymond, W. F. (1969). The nutritive value of forage crops. Advances in Agronomy 21, 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. B. & Baldwin, R. L. (1978). Substrate preferences in rumen bacteria: evidence of catabolite regulatory mechanisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 36, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satter, L. D. & Slyter, L. L. (1974). Effect of ammonia concentration of rumen microbial production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199–208.Google Scholar
Slyter, L. L. & Weaver, J. M. (1972). Dietary influence on ruminal microbes at constant pH. Journal of Animal Science 35, 288.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. S. (1977). Factors affecting the cellulolytic activity of rumen contents. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 33, 497–502.Google Scholar