Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:21:56.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments with upland rice in southern Belize: fertilizer application, weed control, plant spacing, sowing rate and variety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. E. Johnson ,
P. G. Lee  and
D. Wilman
D. E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Toledo Research and Development Project, Punta Gorda, Belize, Central America
P. G. Lee
Affiliation:
Toledo Research and Development Project, Punta Gorda, Belize, Central America
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University College of Wales, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Agronomic research was carried out on upland rice in Toledo District, Belize, in 1979–86, with the objective of improving returns from the traditional system of shifting cultivation and of examining the potential for reducing the demand for new land by cropping for more than one season. The rice was grown in the wet season on land cleared from forest by slash and burn, using a traditional planting technique, placing seed in holes made with a pointed stick.

In a series of fertilizer experiments, in which rice was grown for up to 7 consecutive years, urea and triple superphosphate both increased grain yield, whereas muriate of potash had no effect. Mean yield in the fifth year was 85 % of that in the first. Urea and triple superphosphate both increased the number of full grains/panicle.

A slash and mulch weed control treatment before sowing resulted in low yields of grain in the third year; yield after the use of propanil and 2,4-D (after sowing) was, on average, 77% of the yield after hand weeding; omitting weed control after sowing led to very low yields, particularly in the second and third years.

In the varieties Bluebonnet and C22, grain yield was increased by reducing the distance between stations, particularly where 6, rather than 15, seeds were sown per station. Reducing the distance between stations increased the leaf area index during crop development and the number of panicles/m2, which more than counterbalanced reductions in the number and area of leaf blades per plant, the number of panicles per plant and the number of full grains per panicle. However, the yield/kg of seed sown and per hour spent planting was greatest at the widest spacing. C22 produced more panicles per plant and a greater weight of grain per plant and per hectare than Bluebonnet.

It was concluded that returns from the traditional system can be improved and the demand for new land reduced.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 116 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 201 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, M. W. (1986). Economic analyses of farm options. In Proceedings of Final Workshop, Toledo Research and Development Project, pp. 119–153. Held on 27–28 February 1986 in Belmopan, Belize. Blue Creek, Belize: Toledo Research and Development Project (PO Box 46, Punta Gorda, Toledo District, Belize).Google Scholar
Centro Internacional De Agricultura Tropical (1984). Upland rice in Latin America. In An Overview of Upland Rice Research (Proceedings of the 1982 Bouake, Ivory Coast Upland Rice Workshop), pp. 93–119. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Counce, P. A., Moldenhauer, K. A. K. & Marx, D. B. (1989). Rice yield and plant yield variability responses to equidistant spacing. Crop Science 29, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Datta, S. K., Moody, K. & Sankaran, S. (1986). Integrated weed management practices for upland rice. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Proceedings of the 1985 Jakarta Conference), pp. 447–460. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, J. R. (1970). Experiments on the fertilization of dry rice (hill padi) in Sarawak, Malaysia. Experimental Agriculture 6, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P. C. & O'Toole, J. C. (1986). Upland Rice: A Global Perspective. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
International Rice Research Institute (1984). An Overview of Upland Rice Research (Proceedings of the 1982 Bouaké, Ivory Coast Upland Rice Workshop). Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
International Rice Research Institute (1986). Progress in Upland Rice Research(Proceedings of the 1985 Jakarta Conference). Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (1987). Development of an alternative cropping system for the uplands of Toledo, Belize, Central America. PhD thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Jones, D. B. & Snyder, G. H. (1987). Seeding rate and row spacing effects on yield and yield components of drillseeded rice. Agronomy Journal 79, 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juo, A. S. R. & Sanchez, P. A. (1986). Soil nutritional aspects with a view to characterize upland rice environments. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Proceedings of the 1985 Jakarta Conference), pp. 85–91. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kellman, M. C. & Adams, C. D. (1970). Milpa weeds of the Cayo District, Belize (British Honduras). Canadian Geographer 14, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. B., Baillie, I. C., Bissett, P. G., Grimble, R. J., Johnson, M. S. & Silva, G. L. (1986). Land Resource Survey of Toledo District, Belize. Surbiton: Land Resources Development Centre, UK Overseas Development Administration.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (1986). Strategies for ecological preservation in upland rice farming systems. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Proceedings of the 1985 Jakarta Conference), pp. 143–152. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lee, P. G. (1983). Review of Agronomic Research, 1979–1983. Toledo Research and Development Project, Phase II, Ministry of Natural Resources, Belize.Google Scholar
Morley, S. G. (1946). The Ancient Maya. California: Stanford University Press; London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H. J. (1986). Adaptive research, preproduction testing, and production programs in Philippine upland rice. In Progress in Upland Rice Research (Proceedings of the 1985 Jakarta Conference), pp. 511–521. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. & Greenland, D. J. (1960). The soil under shifting cultivation. Technical Communication, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, No. 51. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Osborn, A. (1982). Socio-anlhropological Aspects of Development in Southern Belize. Belize: Ministry of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A. (1976). Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A. & Nureña, S. M. A. (1972). Upland rice improvement under shifting cultivation systems in the Amazon Basin of Peru. Technical Bulletin, North Carolina Experimental Station and Peruvian Ministry of Agriculture No. 210.Google Scholar
Shenk, M., Locatelli, E., Burrill, L. & McCarty, T. (1978). Preplant vegetation control for minimum and zero tillage systems. 3e Symposium sur le Desherbage des Cultures Tropicales, Dakar, 1978, Columa, Vol. II, pp. 483–493.Google Scholar
Van Dat, T. (1986). An overview of upland rice in the world. In Progress in Upland Rice Research(Proceedings of the 1985 Jakarta Conference), pp. 51–66. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Walker, S. H. (1973). Summary of Climatic Records for Belize. Surbiton: Land Resources Development Centre, UK Overseas Development Administration.Google Scholar
Watters, R. F. (1971). Shifting cultivation in Latin America. FAO Forestry Development Paper, No. 17. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Wijewardene, R. (1980). Energy-conserving fanning systems for the humid tropics. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia 11, 47–53.Google Scholar
Wilk, R. R. (1981). Agriculture, ecology and domestic organisation among the Kekchi Maya. PhD thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Wright, A. C. S., Romney, D. H., Arbuckle, R. H. & Vial, V. E. (1959). Land in British Honduras. Report of the British Honduras Land Use Survey Team. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. (1972). Physiological aspects of grain yield. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 23, 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., Cock, J. H. & Gomez, K. A. (1976). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice 3rd edn.Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar