Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:40:40.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of tests for predicting the availability of soil manganese to plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. G. Browman ,
G. Chesters  and
H. B. Pionke
M. G. Browman
Affiliation:
Soils Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, U.S.A.
G. Chesters
Affiliation:
Soils Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, U.S.A.
H. B. Pionke
Affiliation:
Soils Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eight soil Mn tests, namely, CH3COONH4-, Mg(NO3)2-, H3PO4-, hydroquinone-, 3m-NH4H2PO4-,1·5m-NH4H2PO4- and EDTA-extractable Mn and total Mn were evaluated for their ability to predict Mn uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) on 63 soils of diverse origin. Regression equations were derived by comparing Mn uptake with each test in combination with pH. The best prediction of Mn uptake was provided by a combination of CH3COONH4-extractable Mn and pH; 52·9 % of the variability in Mn uptake was accounted for by these two variables. EDTA and H3PO4-extractable Mn were superior to the other soil Mn tests in predicting Mn uptake.

The effect of soil properties on the extractability of soil Mn by each extractant was analysed statistically. Only with hydroquinone-extractable Mn did the soil variables investigated account for a major portion of the variability in the Mn test. The soil variables most often correlated significantly with the Mn test were pH and total Mn. Organic carbon and clay contents were significant only in determining EDTA- and Mg(NO3)2-extractable Mn, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 1969 , pp. 335 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, F. (1965). Manganese. In Methods of Soil Analysis (ed. Black, C. A.), pp. 1011–18. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Inc.Google Scholar
Boken, E. (1958). Investigations on determination of the available manganese content in soils. Pl. Soil 9, 269–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, H. G., Mann, P. J. G. & Heintze, S. G. (1947). The ‘easily reducible’ manganese of soils. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 37, 17–22.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1963). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. Table VII. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammes, J. K. (1960). Manganese availability and fixation in soils and correction of deficiency in field crops. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Hammes, J. K. & Berger, K. C. (1960 a). Manganese deficiency in oats and correlation of plant manganese with various soil tests. Soil Sci. 90, 239–44.Google Scholar
Hammes, J. K. & Berger, K. C. (1960 b). Chemical extraction and crop removal of manganese from air dried and moist soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 24, 361–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintze, S. G. (1938). Readily soluble manganese of soils and marsh spot of peas. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 28, 175–86.Google Scholar
Heintze, S. G. (1946). Manganese deficiency in peas and other crops in relation to the availability of soil manganese. J. agric Sci., Camb. 36, 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helling, C. S., Chesters, G. & Corey, R. B. (1964). Contribution of organic matter and clay to soil cation exchange capacity as affected by the pH of the saturating solution. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 28, 517–20.Google Scholar
Hoff, D. J. & Mederski, H. J. (1958). The chemical estimation of plant available soil manganese. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 22, 129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. H. P. & Leeper, G. W. (1951). The availability of various manganese oxides to plants. Pl. Soil 3, 141–53.Google Scholar
Kilmer, V. J. & Alexander, L. T. (1949). Methods of making mechanical analyses of soils. Soil Sci. 68, 15–24.Google Scholar
Ludwick, A. E. (1967). Availability of manganese and zinc in fusions with sulfur. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Mulder, E. G. & Gerretsen, F. C. (1952). Soil manganese in relation to plant growth. Adv. Agron. 4, 222–7.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S. (1931). The availability of manganese in the soil. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 21, 762–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, C. D. & Harmer, P.M. (1943). The manganous-manganic equilibrium in soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 7, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, C. D., McHaroue, J. S. & Hodgkiss, W. S. (1942). Determination of active manganese in soil. Soil Sci. 54, 253–7.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical Methods, 4th ed. p. 148. Iowa State College Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Steenbjerg, F. (1933). Undersogelser over Manganindholdet: dansk Jord. I Det ombyttelige Mangan. Tidsskr. PlAvl 39, 401–36.Google Scholar
Steenbjerg, F. (1935). The exchangeable manganese in Danish soils and its relationship to plant growth. Trans. Int. Soc. Soil Sci. (3rd. Congress, Oxford.) 1, 198–201.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar