Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:27:05.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of phosphate fertilizers: I. Immediate value of dicalcium phosphate, nitrophosphates, Gafsa rock phosphate basic slag and potassium metaphosphate for barley and ryegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. E. G. Mattingly
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Bothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Bothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.

Summary

Three granular nitrophosphates containing 5, 26 and 50 % of their total phosphorus in a water-soluble form, granular potassium metaphosphate, Gafsa rock phosphate and basic slag (both as powders) were compared with granular superphosphate and powdered dicalcium phosphate as standards in two annual experiments with ryegrass and in three experiments with barley.

In 1960 total yields of ryegrass during a whole season were similar with all fertilizers. Nitrophosphate-5, Gafsa rock phosphate and basic slag acted more slowly than granular superphosphate and grass grew less well and took up less phosphorus during the first 12 weeks. Over the whole growing season more phosphorus was taken up by grass from powdered dicalcium phosphate and from granular potassium metaphosphate (0.5–2.0 mm) than from granular superphosphate (1.0–4.0 mm).

Powdered dicalcium phosphate was equivalent to about 60% as much phosphorus applied as superphosphate to barley. Rock phosphate was almost inert and percentage granular superphosphate equivalents of basic slag and potassium metaphosphate were 22 and 23% respectively. Percentage superphosphate equivalents of the granular nitrophosphates were 1, 25 and 53% and almost equal to the water-soluble phosphate they contained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cooke, G. W. (1966). Phosphorus and potassium fertilisers: their form and place in agriculture. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 92, 337.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W., Mattingly, G. E. G. & Widdowson, F. V. (1958). The value of nitrophosphate fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 50, 253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. & Widdowson, F. V. (1959). Field experiments on phosphate fertilizers: a joint investigation J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 4663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMent, J. D., Terman, G. L. & Bradford, B. N. (1963). Crop response to phosphorus and potassium in potassium phosphates varying widely in particle size. J. agric. Fd Chem. 11, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagin, J. (1966). Evaluation of potassium metaphosphate as fertilizer. Soil Sci. 102, 373–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, F. J. (1963). Potassium metaphosphate: a novel method of manufacture and a summary of its behaviour as a fertiliser. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 76, 436.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. & Stephenson, H. F. (1959). Nature of reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils: II. Dissolution and precipitation reactions involving iron, aluminium, manganese and calcium. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 23, 1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. (1963). The agricultural value of some water and citrate soluble fertilisers: an account of recent work at Rothamsted and elsewhere. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 75, 5797.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. (1968). Evaluation of phosphate fertilizers II. Besidual value of nitrophosphates, Gafsa rock phosphate, basic slag and potassium metaphosphate for potatoes, barley and swedes grown in rotation, with special reference to changes in soil phosphorus status. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk, H. (1963). Über Kalium-poly-metaphosphat als Düngemittel. Z. PFlErnähr. Düng. Bodenk. 101, 3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PlusjÉ, M. H. R. J. (1951). Theory and practice in the treatment of phosphate rock with nitric acid. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 13, 326.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L., Bootdin, D. R. & Webb, J. R. (1962). Evaluation of fertilizers by biological methods. Adv. Agron. 14, 265319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, G. L., Hoffman, W. M. & Wright, B. C. (1964). Crop response to fertilizers in relation to content of ‘available’ phosphorus. Adv. Agron. 16, 59100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdale, S. L. & Rucker, D. L. (1964). Crop response to various phosphates. Tech. Bull. no. 9. The Sulphur Institute, Washington and London.Google Scholar
Van Burg, P. F. J. (1963). The agricultural evaluation of nitrophosphates with particular reference to direct and cumulative phosphate effects, and to interaction between water-solubility and granule size. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 75, 554.Google Scholar