Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:28:46.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of barnyard millet diversity in central Himalayan region for environmental stress tolerance

Part of: AGS Millet Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

A. K. TRIVEDI ,
L. ARYA ,
S. K. VERMA ,
R. K. TYAGI  and
A. HEMANTARANJAN
A. K. TRIVEDI*
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Regional Station, Bhowali–263 132, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
L. ARYA
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi–110012, India
S. K. VERMA
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Regional Station, Bhowali–263 132, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
R. K. TYAGI
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi–110012, India
A. HEMANTARANJAN
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi–221 005, India
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The mountain ecosystem of the Central Himalayan Region is known for its diversity of crops and their wild relatives. In spite of adverse climatic conditions, this region is endowed with a rich diversity of millets. Hence, the aim of the present study was to explore, collect, conserve and evaluate the diversity of barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea) to find out the extent of diversity available in different traits and the traits responsible for abiotic stress tolerance, and to identify trait-specific accessions for crop improvement and also for the cultivation of millets in the region as well as in other similar agro-ecological regions. A total of 178 accessions were collected and evaluated for a range of morpho-physiological and biochemical traits. Significant variability was noted in days to 50% flowering, days to 80% maturity, 1000 seed weight and yield potential of the germplasm. These traits are considered to be crucial for tailoring new varieties for different agro-climatic conditions. Variations in biochemical traits such as lipid peroxidation (0·552–7·421 nmol malondialdehyde formed/mg protein/h), total glutathione (105·270–423·630 mmol/g fresh weight) and total ascorbate (4·980–9·880 mmol/g fresh weight) content indicate the potential of collected germplasm for abiotic stress tolerance. Principal component analysis also indicated that yield, superoxide dismutase activity, plant height, days to 50% flowering, catalase activity and glutathione content are suitable traits for screening large populations of millet and selection of suitable germplasm for crop improvement and cultivation. Trait-specific accessions identified in the present study could be useful in crop improvement programmes, climate-resilient agriculture and improving food security in areas with limited resources.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 10 , December 2017 , pp. 1497 - 1507
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, P. O. Kakori, Lucknow, 226 101 (Uttar Pradesh), India.

References

REFERENCES

Abu Qamar, S., Luo, H., Laluk, K., Mickelbart, V. M. & Mengiste, T. (2009). Crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses in tomato is mediated by the AIM1 transcription factor. Plant Journal 58, 347–360.Google Scholar
Ahuja, I., de Vos, R. C., Bones, A. M. & Hall, R. D. (2010). Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends in Plant Science 15, 664–674.Google Scholar
Allen, M. R. & Ingram, W. J. (2002). Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419, 224–232.Google Scholar
Amasino, R. (2010). Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. Plant Journal 61, 1001–1013.Google Scholar
Andreasson, E. & Ellis, B. (2010). Convergence and specificity in the Arabidopsis MAPK nexus. Trends in Plant Science 15, 106–113.Google Scholar
Asada, K. (1992). Ascorbate peroxidase – A hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 85, 235–241.Google Scholar
Asada, K. (1999). The water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50, 601–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, C. & Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: improved assay and an assay applicable to acrylamide. Analytical Biochemistry 44, 276–287.Google Scholar
Begna, S. H., Smith, D. L., Hamilton, R. I., Dwyer, L. M. & Stewart, D. W. (2001). Corn genotypic variation effects on seedling emergence and leaf appearance of short-season areas. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186, 267–271.Google Scholar
Bostock, R. M., Yamamoto, H., Choi, D., Ricker, K. E. & Ward, B. L. (1992). Rapid stimulation of 5-lipoxygenase activity in potato by the fungal elicitor arachidonic acid. Plant Physiology 100, 1448–1456.Google Scholar
Bowler, C., Van Montagu, M. & Inzé, D. (1992). Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 43, 83–116.Google Scholar
Bray, E. A., Bailey-Serres, J. & Weretilnyk, E. (2000). Responses to abiotic stresses. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants (Eds Gruissem, W., Buchannan, B. B. & Jones, R. L.), pp. 1158–1203. Rockville, MD, USA: American Society of Plant Physiologists.Google Scholar
Choudhury, S., Panda, P., Sahoo, L. & Panda, S. K. (2013). Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8, e23681. doi: 10.4161/psb.23681.Google Scholar
Cockram, J., Jones, H., Leigh, F. J., O'Sullivan, D., Powell, W., Laurie, D. A. & Greenland, A. J. (2007). Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: genes domestication and sustainable productivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 1231–1244.Google Scholar
Cordewener, J., Booij, H., van der Zandt, H., van Engelen, F., van Kammen, A. & de Vries, S. (1991). Tunicamycin-inhibited carrot somatic embryogenesis can be restored by secreted cationic peroxidase isoenzymes. Planta 184, 478–486.Google Scholar
Dhindsa, R. S. & Matowe, W. (1981). Drought tolerance in two mosses: correlated with enzymatic defense against lipid peroxidation. Journal of Experimental Botany 32, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, A. C. & Yentsch, C. S. (1956). Plankton pigment monographs. Journal of Marine Research 15, 91–101.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, S., Upadhyaya, H., Senthilvel, S., Hash, C., Fukunaga, K., Diao, X., Santra, D., Baltensperger, D. & Prasad, M. (2012). Millets: genetic and genomic resources. In Plant Breeding Reviews vol. 35 (Ed. Janick, J.), pp. 247–375. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Falster, D. S. & Westoby, M. (2003). Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecology & Evolution 18, 337–343.Google Scholar
FAO (2014). FAOSTAT. Rome, Italy: FAO. Available online from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed 11 July 2017).Google Scholar
Foyer, C. H. & Noctor, G. (2005). Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 17, 1866–1875.Google Scholar
Fujita, M., Fujita, Y., Noutoshi, Y., Takahashi, F., Narusaka, Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. & Shinozaki, K. (2006). Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9, 436–442.Google Scholar
Griffith, O. W. (1980). Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Analytical Biochemistry 106, 207–212.Google Scholar
Holmgren, A. (1979). Glutathione-dependent synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides. Characterization of the enzymatic mechanism of Escherichia coli glutaredoxin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 254, 3672–3678.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. A. & Asada, K. (1984). Purification of dehydroascorbate reductase from spinach and its characterization as a thiol enzyme. Plant and Cell Physiology 25, 85–92.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. A., Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. (1984). Monodehydroascorbate in spinach chloroplasts and its participation in regeneration of ascorbate for scavenging hydrogen peroxide. Plant and Cell Physiology 25, 385–395.Google Scholar
Jagtap, V. & Bhargava, S. (1995). Variation in the antioxidant metabolism of drought tolerant and drought susceptible varieties of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Exposed to high light, low water and high temperature stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 145, 195–197.Google Scholar
Joshi, V. (2013). Assessment of genetic variability and identification of genotypes for different traits in Barnyard millet (Echinochola spp.). International Journal of Agricultural and Food Science 4, 65–67.Google Scholar
Jouili, H., Bouazizi, H. & El Ferjani, E. (2011). Plant peroxidases: biomarkers of metallic stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33, 2075–2082.Google Scholar
Khush, G. S. (1999). Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome 2, 646–655.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Kim, I. S., Shin, S. Y., Park, T. H., Park, H. M., Kim, Y. H., Lee, G. S., Kang, H. G., Lee, S. H. & Yoon, S. H. (2014). Overexpression of dehydroascorbate reductase confers enhanced tolerance to salt stress in rice plants (Oryza sativa L. japonica). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 200, 444–456.Google Scholar
Knörzer, O. C., Durner, J. & Boger, P. (1996). Alterations in the antioxidative system of suspension-cultured soybean cells (Glycine max) induced by oxidative stress. Physiologia Plantarum 97, 388–396.Google Scholar
Kumar, K. K., Kumar, K. R., Ashrit, R. G., Deshpande, N. R. & Hansen, J. W. (2004). Climate impacts on Indian agriculture. International Journal of Climatology 24, 1375–1393.Google Scholar
Kumar, J., Kumar, B. & Yadav, V. K. (2007). Small Millets Research at G.B. Pant University. Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India: G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology.Google Scholar
Laloi, C., Appel, K. & Danon, A. (2004). Reactive oxygen signaling: the latest news. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7, 323–328.Google Scholar
Lata, C., Gupta, S. & Prasad, M. (2013). Foxtail millet: a model crop for genetic and genomic studies in bioenergy grasses. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 33, 328–343.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A. & Johnson, B. E. (1998). Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agronomy Journal 90, 787–792.Google Scholar
Masato, O. (1980). An improved method for determination of L-ascorbic acid and L-dehydroascorbic acid in blood plasma. Clinica Chimica Acta 103, 259–268.Google Scholar
Massad, T. J., Dyer, L. A. & Vega, C. G. (2012). Costs of defense and a test of the carbon-nutrient balance and growth-differentiation balance hypotheses for two co-occurring classes of plant defense. PLoS ONE 7, e47554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047554.Google Scholar
Meister, A. (1981). Metabolism and functions of glutathione. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 6, 231–234.Google Scholar
Mittler, R., Vanderauwera, S., Gollery, M. & Van Breusegem, F. (2004). Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends in Plant Science 9, 490–498.Google Scholar
Moles, A. T. & Leishman, M. R. (2008). The seedling as part of a plant's life history strategy. In Seedling Ecology and Evolution (Eds Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. & Simpson, R. L.), pp. 217–238. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. (1987). Purification of ascorbate peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts; its inactivation in ascorbate-depleted medium and reactivation by monodehydroascorbate radical. Plant and Cell Physiology 28, 131–140.Google Scholar
Noctor, G. & Foyer, C. H. (1998) Ascorbate glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49, 249–279.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. & Nagar, P. K. (2002). Leaf surface wetness and morphological characteristics of Valeriana jatamansi grown under open and shade habitats. Biologia Plantarum 45, 291–294.Google Scholar
Paranhos, A., Fernández-Tárrago, J. & Corchete, P. (1999). Relationship between active oxygen species and cardenolide production in cell cultures of Digitalis thapsi: effect of calcium restriction. New Phytologist 141, 51–60.Google Scholar
Prabha, D., Negi, Y. K. & Khanna, V. K. (2010). Morphological and isozyme diversity in the accessions of two cultivated species of barnyard millet. Nature and Science 8, 71–76.Google Scholar
Prasanna, P. L., Murthy, J. S. V. S., Ramakumar, P. V. & Rao, S. V. (2013). Studies on correlation and path analysis in Indian genotypes of Italian millet [Setaria italica (L.) BEAUV]. World Research Journal of Plant Breeding 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
Qin, F., Shinozaki, K. & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2011). Achievements and challenges in understanding plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance. Plant and Cell Physiology 52, 1569–1582.Google Scholar
Rao, M. V., Paliyath, G. & Ormrod, D. P. (1996). Ultraviolet B and ozone induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliyana . Plant Physiology 110, 125–136.Google Scholar
Rebhun, L. I., Miller, M., Schnaitman, T. C., Nath, J. & Mellon, M. (1976). Cyclic nucleotides, thioldisulfide status of proteins, and cellular control processes. Journal of Supramolecular Structure 5, 199–219.Google Scholar
Roche, P., Díaz-Burlinson, N. & Gachet, S. (2004). Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits: which traits are the more reliable? Plant Ecology 174, 37–48.Google Scholar
Sankhala, A., Chopra, S. & Sankhala, A. K. (2004). Effect of processing on tannin, phytate and in vitro iron in underutilized millets – Bajra (Pennisetum typhoideum) and Kangni (Setaria italica). Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 41, 55–62.Google Scholar
Sateesh, P. V. (2010). Millets: Future of Food and Farming. Bangalore, India: Eternal Bhoomi for Earth Conscious and Sustainable Living. Available online from: http://www.bhoomimagazine.org/article/millets-future-food-and-farming (accessed 11 July 2017).Google Scholar
Scandalios, J. G., Guan, L. & Polidoros, A. N. (1997). Catalases in plants: gene structure, properties, regulation and expression. In Oxidative Stress and the Molecular Biology of Antioxidant Defenses (Ed. Scandalios, J. G.), pp. 343–403. New York, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Schuppler, U., He, P. H., John, P. C. & Munns, R. (1998). Effect of water stress on cell division and cell-division-cycle-2-like cell-cycle kinase activity in wheat leaves. Plant Physiology 117, 667–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shao, H. B., Chu, L. Y., Jaleel, C. A. & Zhao, C. X. (2008). Water-deficit stress – induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331, 215–225.Google Scholar
Shigeoka, S., Ishikawa, T., Tamoi, M., Miyagawa, Y., Takeda, T., Yabuta, Y. & Yoshimura, K. (2002). Regulation and function of ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1305–1319.Google Scholar
Sisó, S., Camarero, J. J. & Gil-Pelegrín, E. (2001). Relationship between hydraulic resistance and leaf morphology in broadleaf Quercus species: a new interpretation of leaf lobation. Trees - Structure and Function 15, 341–345.Google Scholar
Smith, I. K., Vierheller, T. L. & Thorne, C. A. (1988). Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid). Analytical Biochemistry 175, 408–413.Google Scholar
Srikanth, A. & Schmid, M. (2011). Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68, 2013–2037.Google Scholar
Strain, H. H., Bengamin, T. C. & Walter, A. S. (1971). Analytical procedure for isolation, identification, estimation, investigation of chlorophyll. In Methods in Enzymology vol. 23, Photosynthesis, Part A (Ed. Pietro, A. S.), pp. 452–476. New York, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Todaka, D., Nakashima, K., Shinozaki, K. & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2012). Toward understanding transcriptional regulatory networks in abiotic stress responses and tolerance in rice. Rice 5, 6. http://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-5-6.Google Scholar
Trivedi, A. K., Arya, L., Verma, M., Verma, S. K., Tyagi, R. K. & Hemantaranjan, A. (2015). Genetic variability in proso millet [Panicum miliaceum] germplasm of Central Himalayan Region based on morpho-physiological traits and molecular markers. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37, 23. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1770-y.Google Scholar
Wang, A. G. & Luo, G. H. (1990). Quantitative relation between the reaction of hydroxylamine and superoxide anion radicals in plants. Plant Physiology Communications 6, 55–57.Google Scholar
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.Google Scholar
Willekens, H., Chamnongpol, S., Davey, M., Schraudner, M., Langebartels, C., Van Montagu, M., Inzé, D. & Van Camp, W. (1997). Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO Journal 16, 4806–4816.Google Scholar
Zelitch, I., Havir, E. A., McGonigle, B., McHale, N. A. & Nelson, T. (1991). Leaf catalase mRNA and catalase-protein levels in a high-catalase tobacco mutant with O2 resistant photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 97, 1592–1595.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Kirkham, M. B. (1996). Lipid peroxidation in sorghum and sunflower seedlings as affected by ascorbic acid, and propyl gallate. Journal of Plant Physiology 149, 489–493.Google Scholar