Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:39:10.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of maintenance energy requirements of beef cattle and sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

L. E. R. DAWSON  and
R. W. J. STEEN
L. E. R. DAWSON
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, BT26 6DR, UK
R. W. J. STEEN
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, BT26 6DR, UK Also a member of staff of the Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and the Queen's University of Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metabolizable energy intake and heat production were measured in a series of calorimetry experiments carried out at the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, between 1993 and 1996 with beef cattle and sheep. A total of 75 estimates were made with cattle: 23 with Charolais cross steers; 16 with Simmental cross steers and 36 with Angus cross steers (450–628 kg liveweight). Fifty-six estimates were made with lambs: 24 with Blackface cross, eight with Suffolk cross and 24 with Texel cross (23–53 kg liveweight). The diets offered to both cattle and sheep contained proportionately 0·0–0·8 cereal-based concentrates, the remainder being grass silage. Linear regressions of energy retention (measured by calorimetry) against metabolizable energy intake were produced for the cattle and sheep studies. From these linear regressions an estimate of metabolizable energy required for maintenance (MEm) was obtained. For cattle, the derived MEm was 0·614 MJ/kg LW0·75 per day, and for sheep the derived MEm was 0·460 MJ/kg LW/kg LW0·75 per day. The estimates were proportionately 0·34 higher in cattle and 0·32 higher in sheep than the 1990 values of the UK Agricultural and Food Research Council.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 131 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 477 - 485
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)