Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:55:53.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equipment and housing for intake and digestibility studies with large numbers of wethers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. J. Minson  and
R. Milford
D. J. Minson
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical Pastures, C.S.I.R.O., Cooper Laboratory, Lawes, Queensland, Australia
R. Milford
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical Pastures, C.S.I.R.O., Cooper Laboratory, Lawes, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In many nutritional experiments with cut pasture the voluntary intake and digestibility is determined with pen-fed sheep. However, the voluntary intakes of sheep are extremely variable, the between-animal coefficient of variation varying between 13·1% and 10·5% (Blaxter, Wainman & Wilson, 1961; Minson, Harris, Raymond & Milford, 1964). Thus each pasture cut must be fed to large numbers of animals if differences between pasture species and varieties are to be detected with significance. (Heaney, Pritchard & Pigden, 1968.)

Type
Short Note
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 381 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beacom, S. E. & Thompson, J. C. (1963). Note on a battory-type digestion–metabolism unit for sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 43, 390–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Wilson, R. S. (1961). The regulation of food intake by sheep. Anim. Prod. 3, 51–61.Google Scholar
Bratzler, J. W. (1951). A metabolism crate for use with sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 10, 592–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Elliott, R. F., Swift, R. W., Jones, H. & Smith, V. E. (1946). Variation in determinations of digestive capacity of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 5, 298–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geri, G. (1963). Nutritive value of forages. 2. Equipment and experimental method in digestibility trials. Riv. Zootec. 36, 26–31.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute (1961). Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Bull. Commonw. Bur. Past. Fld Crops, no. 45.Google Scholar
Heaney, D. P., Pritchard, G. I. & Pigden, W. J. (1968). Variability in ad libitum forage intakes by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1967). The voluntary intake and digestibility, in sheep, of chopped and pelleted Digitaria decumbens (pangola grass) following a late application of fertilizer nitrogen. Br. J. Nutr. 21, 587–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J., Harris, C. E., Raymond, W. F. & Milford, R. (1964). The digestibility and voluntary intake of S 22 and H. I. Ryegrass, S 170 Tall Fescue, S 48 Timothy, S 215 Meadow Fescue and Germinal Cocksfoot. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 19, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Milford, R. (1967). In vitro and faecal nitrogen techniques for predicting the voluntary intake of Chloris gayana. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 22, 170–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Harris, C. E. & Harker, V. G. (1953). Studies on the digestibility of herbage. 1. Technique of measurement of digestibility and some observations affecting the accuracy of digestibility data. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 8, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, A. R. & Downes, A. M. (1963). A metabolism cage for sheep. Lab. Pract. 12, 1006–9.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Horton, E. A. (1936). Technique of digestibility trials with sheep and its application to rabbits. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 4, 25–35.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1959). The efficiency of wool production of grazing Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 10, 685–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. K. & Cinneide, F. A. (1962). A metabolism cage for wethers. Irish J. agric. Res. 1, 338–41.Google Scholar