Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:42:08.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of sodium hydroxide and of energy and protein supplements on the voluntary intake and digestibility of barley, oat and wheat straw by cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. W. W. Ng'ambi
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5 AH, UK
R. C. Campling
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5 AH, UK

Summary

Three change-over experiments with yearling cattle examined the effects on voluntary intake and digestibility of treating barley, oat and wheat straws with NaOH. Increases in intake due to the NaOH treatment were: with barley straw 31 %, oat straw 9% and with wheat straw 1 %, and the corresponding improvements in digestibility were 36, 13 and 24%. A further three experimentswith yearling heifers and steers measured the effects of supplements on the responsein feeding value to NaOH treatment of wheat straw. Increasing the daily supplement of rolled barley from 10 to 3·4 kg led to a decrease in voluntary intake of treated straw from 4·6 to 3·6 kg organic matter (OM), while including urea, to increase the concentrationof nitrogenin a beet pulp supplement from 19 to 24 gN/kg dry matter (DM), gave an increasein intakeof straw from 3·4 to 4·8 kg OM. Providing more than c. 15 gN/kg dietary DM did not lead to a significant increase in voluntary intake or digestibility. In a further experiment, isonitrogenous supplements of rolled barley and soyabean meal, or rolled barley and fishmeal, led to similar intakes and digestibilities of treatedstraw. The variation in response to NaOH treatment is discussed.

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Suppl I. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Chesson, A. (1981). Effects of sodium hydroxide on cereal straws in relation to the enhanced degradation of structural polysaccharides by rumen microorganisms. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 32, 745758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, A. & Murison, S. D. (1989). Biochemical evaluation of straw as a foodstuff for ruminants. In Evaluation of Straw in Ruminant Feeding (Eds Chenost, M. & Reiniger, P.), pp. 124133. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Mulholland, J. G. & Forrester, R. I. (1985). Effect of treatment with sodium hydroxide on the feeding value of oat and rape straws for sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 623636.Google Scholar
Creek, M. J., Barker, T. J. & Hargus, W. A. (1983). An evaluation of the use of anhydrous ammonia to treat rice straw. Field document No. 8. UNDP/FAO Beef industry development project EG7/82/007.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Walker, H. G., Kohler, G. O. & Hart, M. R. (1979). Response of ruminants to diets containing sodium hydroxide or ammonia treated rice straw. Journal of Animal Science 48, 92103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, I. K. & Garrett, W. N. (1986). Improving the dry matter digestibility and voluntary intake of low quality roughages by various treatments: A review. Korean Journal of Animal Science 28, 199236.Google Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. & Steacey, G. M. (1979). Effect of anhydrous ammonia treatment on the intake and digestibility of cereal straws by steers. Journal of Animal Science 48, 12391249.Google Scholar
Jewell, S. N. & Campling, R. C. (1986). Aqueous ammonia treatment of wheat straw: voluntary intake and digestibility in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 14, 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C, Hartley, R. D., Keene, A. S. & Cobby, J. M. (1988). The effect of ammoniation on the nutritive value of wheat, barley and oat straws. 1. Changes in chemical composition in relation to digestibility in vitro and cell wall degradability. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19, 159171.Google Scholar
Mathieson, J. (1970). The automated estimation of chromic oxide. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 29, 3OA31A.Google Scholar
Mould, F. L., Ørskov, E. R. & Mann, S. O. (1983).Associative effects of mixed feeds. 1. Effects of type and level of supplementation and theinfluence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. & Kay, M. (1988). Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughage. Animal Production 46, 2934.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R., Beard, J. & Hilliard, E. P. (1979). Variability in the chemical composition of cereal straws and in vitro digestibility with and without sodium hydroxide treatment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agricultureand Animal Husbandry 19, 350353.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Hill, R. E. (1980). A comparison of sources of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre-rich diets.Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687695.Google Scholar