Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:12:50.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation on sugar beet at Broom's Barn 1973–8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. J. Last ,
A. P. Draycott ,
A. B. Messem  and
D. J. Webb
P. J. Last
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
A. B. Messem
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
D. J. Webb
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During 1973–8 six field experiments examined the effect of 0, 41, 82, 124, 166 and 207 kg N/ha with and without irrigation on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. The culture of the crops was planned to produce a large yield in order to determine the optimal nitrogen application for the above-average crops which many growers are now seeking to produce. Ammonium nitrate was used as the nitrogen source, broadcast in one dose before sowing as was recommended practice in the early 1970s. The growth of the crop was monitored from the seedling stage to harvest in December, as was nitrogen uptake by the crop, and water removal from the soil using a neutron probe.

In 3 years when the weather was dry after drilling, the fertilizer significantly depressed the number of plants which established but plant weights showed that some nitrogen fertilizer was needed early for rapid seedling growth. Changes in the method of applying fertilizer for sugar beet are therefore suggested and are being tested. Soil analyses in the plough layer during establishment (May–June) indicated an optimum concentration of mineral nitrogen of about 40 mg N/kg soil at this stage.

Nitrogen fertilizer was very important for a high yield; throughout the growth of the crop it greatly increased total dry-matter yield and at final harvest this was reflected in sugar yield. Considering the six years together, sugar yield was linearly related to both dry-matter yield and total nitrogen uptake. However, within a year, increasing nitrogen uptake above 200 kg N/ha with nitrogen fertilizer did not increase sugar yield; maximum yields of sugar each year were normally obtained with 125 kg N/ha fertilizer or less, and irrigation had little effect on the optimum amount. Explanations for the lack of responsiveness of sugar beet to greater applications of nitrogen fertilizer are being sought in further more detailed analyses of the crop and its environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 185 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, D. A., Tinker, P. B. H., Draycott, A. P. & Last, P. J. (1970). Nitrogen requirement of sugar beet grown on mineral soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1972). Sugar-beet Nutrition. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Last, P. J., Webb, D. J. & Palmer, M. (1982). Time and method of nitrogen application. British Sugar Beet Review 50 (1), 73–76.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Messem, A. B. (1977). Response by sugar beet to irrigation, 1965–75. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Webb, D. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. M. (1972). The effect of plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. (1976). Field establishment of some vegetable crops; response to a range of soil conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science 51, 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, F. J. & Ulrich, A. (1971). Nitrogen nutrition. Advances in Sugar Beet Production. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Jaogard, K. W. (1979). The effect of plant distribution on yield of sugar beet. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Last, P. J. & Draycott, A. P. (1971). Predicting the amount of nitrogen fertiliser needed for sugar beet by soil analysis. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, P. J. & Draycott, A. P. (1975). Growth and yield of sugar beet on contrasting soils in relation to nitrogen supply. I and II. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 19–26 and 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. & Riley, J. (1980). The effects of temperature on leaf growth of sugar beet varieties. Annals of Applied Biology 94, 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1952). Experiments on the irrigation of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 42, 286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1962). Woburn irrigation, 1951–59. III. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugar Beet Research and Education Committee (1982). Sugar Beet – a Grower's Guide.Google Scholar
Woolley, P. G. & Bennett, W. H. (1962). Effect of soil moisture, nitrogen fertilization, variety and harvest date on root yields and sucrose content of sugar beets. Journal of American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 12 (3), 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar