Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:34:43.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of grinding, either with or without NaOH treatment, on the utilization of straw by yearling dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Smith ,
W. H. Broster ,
Valerie J. Broster  and
J. W. Siviter
T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
Valerie J. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
J. W. Siviter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Processed straw, both ground and ground–NaOH treated, has been compared with long straw in diets of straw and concentrates fed to yearling dairy heifers. Protein allowances were varied by the addition of fishmeal.

Improved growth rate was consistently observed with those animals receiving fishmeal. When a fixed amount of barley straw was offered neither digestibility nor growth was affected by the form of the straw. With wheat straw grinding–NaOH treatment resulted in increased growth when fed in diets containing some long roughage. Voluntary intake of straw was additively increased by grinding and by treatment with 5% (w/w) NaOH. Ground-NaOH treatment of straw increased in vitro digestibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 159 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C., Broster, W. H., Rook, J. A. F. & Tuck, V. J. (1965). The effect on growth rate and on milk yield and composition of finely grinding the hay and cooking (flaking) the maize in mixed diets for growing and for milking heifers. Journal of Dairy Research 32, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. N. & Khan, A. R. (1973). Wheat straw and urea in pelleted rations for growing-fattening sheep. Journal of Animal Science 37, 136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1966). The nutritive value of groundand pelleted barley straw. 1. Ground and pelleted versus long straw for growing Ayrshire heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit (1975). First Report. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Wainman, F. W. (1972). The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening cattle and sheep. Proceedings of the British Society for Animal Production, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homb, T., Sundstol, F. & Arnason, J. (1977).Chemical treatment of straw at commercial and farm levels. New Feed Resources: Animal Production and Health Paper 4, pp. 25–37. Rome: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. G. (1978). Treating straw for animal feeding: an assessment of its technical and economic feasibility. Animal Production and Health Paper 10. Rome: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, M. C. N. & Owen, E. (1975). Sodium hydroxide treatment of barley straw; effect of volume and concentration of solution on digestibility and intake by sheep. Animal Production 21, 313–322.Google Scholar
Kay, M. (1972). Processed roughage in diets containing cereals for ruminants. In Cereal Processing and Digestion, pp. 39–52. London: U.S. Feed Grains Council.Google Scholar
Leibholz, J. (1975). Ground roughage in the diet of the early-weaned calf. Animal Production 20, 93–100.Google Scholar
Levy, D. & Holzer, Z. (1971). The relative value of concentrates and roughage for fattening cattle. Animal Production 13, 569–579.Google Scholar
Louw, G. N., Steenkamp, E. L. & van der Merwe, P. K. (1972). The influence of liveweight on the voluntary intake of low quality roughage by Merino sheep and its implications for successful rewintering on grass veldt. South African Journal of Animal Science 2, 9–12.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin, no. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1963). The effect of pelleting and wafering on the feeding value of roughage. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, L. A. (1964). Nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. 1. General principles involved with ruminants and effect of feeding pelleted or wafered forage to dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 23, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, P. B. & Ghadaki, M. B. (1973). Effect of diets containing different levels of wheat straw on lamb performance, feed intake and digestibility. Animal Production 16, 77–85.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Beever, D. E. & Thompson, D. J. (1976). The influence of physical processing on the intake, digestion and utilization of dried herbage. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, E. (1978). Processing of roughages. In Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 127–148. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. G. (1976 a). The feeding value of straw to ruminants. ADAS Quarterly Review 21, 220–234.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. G. (1976 b). The feeding value and worthwhileness of chemically processed straw for ruminants. ADAS Quarterly Review 22, 247–266.Google Scholar
Pirie, R. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1978). Alkali treatment of straw for ruminants. 1. Utilization of complete diets containing straw by beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 143–154. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific) Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. V. & Jhanwar, B. M. (1973). Effect of supplementation of wheat straw with concentrates on voluntary intake, digestibility and growth in cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Science 43, 688–693.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1978). The utilization of poor quality roughages by yearling dairy heifers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1979). The collection of faeces and urine from steers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 215–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Hill, R. E. (1980). A comparison of sources of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre-rioh diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W. H. & Siviter, J. W. (1980). An assessment of barley straw and oat hulls as energy sources for yearling cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology (5th edition). Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, H. & Clarke, C. J. (1974). The use of processed straw in rations for ruminants. Proceedings 8th Conference for Feed Manufacturers, University of Nottingham (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 205–233. London: Butterworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J. (1972). Physical form of the diet in relation to rumen fermentation. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Brigstocke, T. (1977). The commercial straw process. Process Biochemistry 12, 17–21.Google Scholar