Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:09:42.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of grazing chicory (Cichorium intybus) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/white clover (Trifolium repens) pasture upon the growth and voluntary feed intake of red and hybrid deer during lactation and post-weaning growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Kusmartono ,
T. N. Barry ,
P. R. Wilson ,
P. D. Kemp  and
K. J. Stafford
Kusmartono
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
T. N. Barry
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
P. R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
P. D. Kemp
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
K. J. Stafford
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two grazing trials were carried out at Palmerston North, New Zealand using lactating red deer hinds in summer 1994 (Expt 1) and using weaner deer during the autumn, winter and spring of 1993 (Expt 2), to compare the feeding value of chicory (Cichorium intybus) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/white clover (Trifolium repens) pasture for increasing the growth of deer calves. Red deer and hybrid (0·25 elk; 0·75 red deer) calves were used in both experiments. Experiment 2 concluded with slaughter at the end of spring, when the deer were c. 12 months old. In both experiments, animals were rotationally grazed on either pasture or chicory with DM allowances being 12 kg DM/hind per day (Expt 1), and 6, 6 and 7 kg DM/head per day during autumn, winter and spring respectively (Expt 2).

Perennial ryegrass comprised 62% of pasture on offer in Expt 1 and 78–90% in Expt 2, whilst chicory comprised 90–92% of forage on offer in both experiments. Relative to pasture, chicory had a higher ratio of readily fermentable: structural carbohydrate and had higher organic matter digestibility (OMD) in summer and autumn but not in spring.

Deer grazing chicory had higher voluntary feed intake (VFI), bite weight, liveweight gain (LWG), carcass dressing percentage and carcass weight and much shorter ruminating time than deer grazing pasture. Hybrid deer grew better than red deer and there were forage × genotype interactions in Expt 2, with LWG and carcass weight of hybrid deer being much greater when grazed on chicory. Carcass weight for red deer and hybrid stags was 63·2 and 73·0 kg when grazed on chicory and 56·6 and 57·0 kg when grazed on pasture. Grazing chicory advanced the date of first-cut velvet antler by 28 days and increased the weight of total harvestable (first-cut + regrowth) velvet antler. It is concluded that grazing chicory increased carcass weight, especially in hybrid stags with increased growth potential, and increased velvet antler production. This was achieved by increased VFI in all seasons and increased OMD of chicory in summer and autumn relative to deer grazing pasture. Further research is need to determine the efficiency of rumination on particle size breakdown and to measure rumen outflow rate in deer fed chicory.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , November 1996 , pp. 387 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adam, J. L. (1988). Pasture for deer production. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 49, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ataja, A. M., Wilson, P. R., Barry, T. N., Hodgson, J., Hoskinson, R. M., Parker, W. J. & Purchas, R. W. (1992). Early venison production from red deer (Cervus elaphus) as affected by grazing perennial or annual ryegrass pastures, pasture surface height and immunization against melatonin. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R. W. (1967). Quantitative studies of ruminant digestion. II. Loss of ingested plant carbohydrates from the reticulo-rumen. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. & Cruickshank, G. J. (1989). The effect of environmental factors on growth and development. In Meat Production and Processing (Eds Purchas, R. W., Butler-Hogg, B. W. & Davies, A. S.), pp. 87–101. New Zealand Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication No. 11.Google Scholar
Costigan, P. & Ellis, K. J. (1987). Analysis of faecal chromium from controlled released devices. New Zealand Journal of Technology 3, 89–92.Google Scholar
Domingue, B. M. F., Dellow, D. W., Wilson, P. R. & Barry, T. N. (1991). Comparative digestion in deer, goats and sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennessy, P. F. & Suttie, J. M. (1985). Antler growth: nutrition and endocrine factors. In Biology of Deer Production (Eds Fennessy, P. F. & Drew, K. R.), pp. 239–250. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 22.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1982). Ingestive behaviour. In Herbage Intake Handbook (Ed. Leaver, J. D.), pp. 113–138. Maidenhead: The British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Hoskin, S. O., Stafford, K. J. & Barry, T. N. (1995). Digestion, rumen fermentation and chewing behaviour of red deer fed fresh chicory and perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. F. & Hay, R. J. M. (1990). A photographic technique for assessing the pasture species performance of grazing animals. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 51, 151–196.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. F. (1993). Maximising red deer venison production through high quality pasture. In Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress (Eds Baker, M. J., Crush, J. R. & Humphreys, L. R.), pp. 1497–1500. Palmerston North: Keeling and Mundy Ltd.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. S. & Hodgson, J. (1979). The effect of daily herbage allowance and sward characteristics upon the ingestive behaviour and herbage intake of calves under strip-grazing management. Grass and Forage Science 34, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. J. (1989). Principles of classification and grading. In Meat Production and Processing (Eds Purchas, R. W., Butler-Hogg, B. W. & Davies, A. S.), pp. 143–157. New Zealand Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication No. II.Google Scholar
Li, G., Kemp, P. D. & Hodgson, J. (1994). Control of reproductive growth in puna chicory by grazing management. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 56, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niezen, J. H., Barry, T. N., Hodgson, J., Wilson, P. R., Ataja, A. M., Parker, W. J. & Holmes, C. W. (1993). Growth responses in red deer calves and hinds grazing red clover, chicory or perennial ryegrass/white clover swards during lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. J., McCutcheon, S. N. & Carr, D. H. (1989). Effect of herbage type and level of intake on the release of chromic oxide from intraruminal controlled release capsules in sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, P. G. & Holland, R. (1977). Predicting in-vivo digestibilities of herbages by exhaustive enzyme hydrolysis of cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, E. G., Warner, R. G., Harrison, H. N. & Loosli, J. K. (1959). The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa in the young calf. Journal of Dairy Science 42, 1600–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semiadi, G., Barry, T. N., Wilson, P. R., Hodgson, J. & Purchas, R. W. (1993). Growth and venison production from red deer (Cervus elaphus) grazing red clover (Trifolium pratense) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/while clover (Trifolium repens) pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soetrisno, E., Barry, T. N., Wilson, P. R., Hodgson, J. & Purchas, R. W. (1994). Effects of grazing red clover (Trifolium pratense) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/white clover (Trifolium repens) pastures upon growth and venison production from weaner red deer (Cervus elaphus). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, K. J. (1995). The stomach of the sambar deer (Cervus unicolor). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 24, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis System (1987). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. Cary, US: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Suttie, J. M. & Kay, R. N. B. (1983). The influence of nutrition and photoperiod on the growth of antlers of young red deer. In Antler Development in Cervidae (Ed. Brown, R. D.), pp. 61–71. Texas A and M University Press.Google Scholar
Tamate, H., McGilliard, A. D., Jacobson, N. L. & Getty, R. (1962). Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. (1973). The feeding value of herbage. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage, Vol. 3 (Eds Butler, G. W. & Bailey, R. W.), pp. 131–178. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. & Waghorn, G. C. (1986). Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the reticulorumen. In The Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology (Eds Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. & Dobson, A.), pp. 488–517. New Jersey: Reston Books.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar