Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:48:45.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of drilling date on the growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annum) in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. L. Dixon  and
P. J. W. Lutman
F. L. Dixon
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Long Ashton Research Station, Long Ashton, Bristol BSJ8 9AF, UK
P. J. W. Lutman
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Long Ashton Research Station, Long Ashton, Bristol BSJ8 9AF, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The growth and yield of five cultivars of sunflower (Frankasol, Cerflor, Sunbred 246, Sokota 2057 and Sigco EX 10), sown from the end of March to the beginning of May, were studied in three experiments at Long Ashton Research Station, UK, during 1986, 1987 and 1988. The time from sowing to emergence and to maturity (as assessed by seed moisture content) was shortened by later drilling, although earlier sown crops were still ready for harvest slightly before the later sown ones. Cultivars differed in speed of development; Frankasol and Cerflor were the slowest to develop and Sigco EX 10 the fastest. Plant heights, head diameters and yields were all affected more by cultivar than by sowing date. The slower maturing cultivars produced the highest yields. Infection levels with Botrytis cinerea seemed to be related to the date of flowering, as early sown and fast developing cultivars became infected earlier. There were few benefits from early sowing and the optimum time appeared to be mid- to late April. Overall, Sunbred 246 was the most successful cultivar in these experiments, combining reasonable yields with moderately early maturity.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 2 , October 1992 , pp. 197 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon., (1986). La culture du tournesol. Publication Centre Technique, Inlerprofessionel, Oleagineux Metropolitan (CETIOM).Google Scholar
Church, V. J. & Rawlinson, C. J. (1992). Sunflower – a potential crop for the UK. In Proceedings of the 7th Consultation of the European Cooperative Research Net-work on Sunflowers (Pisa). Helia 14 (15), 117–122.Google Scholar
Church, V. J., Rawlinson, C. J. & Fitt, B. D. L. (1990). Development and control of Botrytis in UK sunflower crops. In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases, pp. 739–743.Google Scholar
European Plant Protection Organisation (1987). EPPO Crop Growth Stage Keys – Sunflower. EPPO Bulletin 17, 525–531.Google Scholar
Gubbels, G. H. & Dedio, W. (1989). Effect of plant density and seeding date on early and late maturing sunflower hybrids. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 69, 1251–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B. C., Oplinger, E. S., Rund, R., Peters, J. & Weis, G. (1984). Effect of planting date and plant population on sunflower performance. Agronomy Journal 76, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbourne, R. (1988). Sunflower: A new crop in British agriculture. Proceedings of the 12th International Sunflower Conference (Novi Sad) 1, 331–335.Google Scholar