Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:31:24.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of dietary soybean isoflavone on immunity in Chinese yellow-feathered broilers challenged with infectious bursal disease virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

S. Q. Jiang
Affiliation:
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
Z. Y. Jiang*
Affiliation:
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
J. L. Chen
Affiliation:
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
C. Zhu
Affiliation:
Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
P. Hong
Affiliation:
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
F. Chen
Affiliation:
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, The Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Author for correspondence: Z. Y. Jiang, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

To investigate the effects of soybean isoflavone (SI) on immunity in infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)-infected broilers, chicks were fed the same basal diet supplemented with 0 (non-infected control), 0 (infected control), 10, 20 or 40 mg/kg SI for 44 days. At 21 days old, chickens were inoculated with bursal infectious dose causing 50% morbidity of the IBDV BC 6/85 strain by the eye-drop and nasal route (except for non-infected controls). Results showed that, over 1–23 days post-infection (dpi), there was a significant interaction between SI supplementation level and time: high-level SI supplementation increased peripheral T lymphocyte proliferation, percentages of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD4+ to CD8+ ratio, serum concentrations of IgA, IgM and IgG, and IBDV antibody titres. Except for serum IgA and IgM, these variables increased over time with far higher values at 23 dpi than earlier. Compared with non-infected controls, IBDV inoculation decreased peripheral T lymphocyte proliferation at 3 dpi, percentages of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, and serum IgG, IgM concentration at 23 dpi, and increased IBDV antibody titres at 7, 15 and 23 dpi. Supplemental SI quadratically increased peripheral T lymphocyte proliferation, CD4+ to CD8+ ratio and serum IgA concentration at 3 dpi, percentages of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes at 3 and 23 dpi, and serum IgM concentration and IBDV antibody titres at 23 dpi. These results indicate that dietary SI improved cellular and humoral immunity of IBDV-infected birds and may enhance resistance of Yellow-feathered broilers to infectious diseases.

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Abdukalykova, ST, Zhao, X and Ruiz-Feria, CA (2008) Arginine and vitamin E modulate the subpopulations of T lymphocytes in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 87, 5055.Google Scholar
Balamurugan, V and Kataria, JM (2006) Economically important non-oncogenic immunosuppressive viral diseases of chicken-current status. Veterinary Research Communications 30, 541566.Google Scholar
Belcavello, L, Dutra, JCV, de Freitas, JV, Aranha, IP, Batitucci, M and do, CP (2012) Mutagenicity of ipriflavone in vivo and in vitro. Food and Chemical Toxicology 50, 9961000.Google Scholar
Biggs, PM (1985) Infectious animal disease and its control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 310, 259274.Google Scholar
Butcher, GD and Miles, RD (2002) Interrelationship of Nutrition and Immunity. VM139. Gainesvill, FL, USA: University of Florida. Available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/VM104 (Accessed 9 January 2018).Google Scholar
Cheng, ZG, Lin, YC, Yu, DQ, Jiang, SQ, Zhou, GL and Jiang, ZY (2005) Effects of daidzein on growth performance and its potential mechanism in finishing pigs. Acta Zoonutrimenta Sinica 17, 3034.Google Scholar
Collisson, EW, Pei, JW, Dzielawa, J and Seo, SH (2000) Cytotoxic T lymphocytes are critical in the control of infectious bronchitis virus in poultry. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 24, 187200.Google Scholar
Cooke, PS, Selvaraj, V and Yellayi, S (2006) Genistein, estrogen receptors, and the acquired immune response. Journal of Nutrition 136, 704708.Google Scholar
Curran, EM, Judy, BM, Newton, LG, Lubahn, DB, Rottinghaus, GE, Macdonald, RS, Franklin, C and Estes, DM (2004) Dietary soy phytoestrogens and ERα signalling modulate interferon gamma production in response to bacterial infection. Clinical & Experimental Immunology 135, 219225.Google Scholar
Donovan, SM, Andres, A, Mathai, RA, Kuhlenschmidt, TB and Kuhlenschmidt, MS (2009) Soy formula and isoflavones and the developing intestine. Nutrition Reviews 67, S192S200.Google Scholar
Feed Database in China (2016) Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China- fifteenth edition. Chinese Feed 21, 3343.Google Scholar
Fussell, LW (1998) Poultry industry strategies for control of immunosuppressive diseases. Poultry Science 77, 11931196.Google Scholar
Guo, TL, White, KL, Brown, RD, Delclos, KB, Newbold, RR, Weis, C, Germolec, DR and McCay, JA (2002) Genistein modulates splenic natural killer cell activity, antibody-forming cell response, and phenotypic marker expression in F0 and F1 generations of Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 181, 219227.Google Scholar
Kibenge, FS, Dhillon, AS and Russell, RG (1988) Biochemistry and immunology of infectious bursal disease virus. Journal of General Virology 69, 17571775.Google Scholar
Kim, IJ, You, SK, Kim, H, Yeh, H and Sharma, JM (2000) Characteristics of bursal T lymphocytes induced by infectious bursal disease virus. Journal of Virology 74, 88848892.Google Scholar
Klein, SL, Wisniewski, AB, Marson, AL, Glass, GE and Gearhart, JP (2002) Early exposure to genistein exerts long-lasting effects on the endocrine and immune systems in rats. Molecular Medicine 8, 742749.Google Scholar
Lee, LF, Sharma, JM, Nazerian, K and Witter, RL (1978) Suppression and enhancement of mitogen response in chickens infected with Marek's disease virus and the herpes virus of turkeys. Infection and Immunity 21, 474479.Google Scholar
Liu, DY, He, SJ, Liu, SQ, Tang, YG, Jin, EH, Chen, HL, Li, SH and Zhong, LT (2014) Daidzein enhances immune function in late lactation cows under heat stress. Animal Science Journal 85, 8589.Google Scholar
McNeal, MM, Barone, KS, Rae, MN and Ward, RL (1995) Effector functions of antibody and CD8+ cells in resolution of rotavirus infection and protection against reinfection. Virology 214, 387397.Google Scholar
Morimoto, M, Watanabe, T, Yamori, M, Takebe, M and Wakatsuki, Y (2009) Isoflavones regulate innate immunity and inhibit experimental colitis. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 24, 11231129.Google Scholar
Müller, H, Islam, MR and Raue, R (2003) Research on infectious bursal disease – the past, the present and the future. Veterinary Microbiology 97, 153165.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th rev. Edn. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Powell, PC (1987) Immune mechanisms in infections of poultry. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 15, 87113.Google Scholar
Raff, MC (1973) T and B lymphocytes and immune responses. Nature 242, 1923.Google Scholar
Rautenschlein, S, Yeh, H and Sharma, JM (2002 a) The role of T cells in protection by an inactivated infectious bursal disease virus vaccine. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 89, 159167.Google Scholar
Rautenschlein, S, Yeh, H, Njenga, MK and Sharma, JM (2002 b) Role of intrabursal T cells in infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infection, T cells promote viral clearance but delay follicular recovery. Archives of Virology 147, 285304.Google Scholar
Saif, YM (1991) Immunosuppression induced by infectious bursal disease virus. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 30, 4550.Google Scholar
Saif, YM (1998) Infectious bursal disease and hemorrhagic enteritis. Poultry Science 77, 11861189.Google Scholar
Seo, HS, Wang, L, Smith, R and Collisson, EW (1997) The carboxyl-terminal 120-residue polypeptide of infectious bronchitis virus nucleocapsid induces cytotoxic T lymphocytes and protects chickens from acute infection. Journal of Virology 71,78897894.Google Scholar
Sharma, JM, Kim, IJ, Rautenschlein, S and Yeh, H (2000) Infectious bursal disease virus of chickens: pathogenesis and immunosuppression. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 24, 223235.Google Scholar
Sivanandan, V and Maheswaran, SK (1980) Immune profile of infectious bursal disease. I. Effect of infectious bursal disease virus on peripheral blood T and B lymphocytes in chickens. Avian Diseases 24, 715725.Google Scholar
Sivanandan, V and Maheswaran, SK (1981) Immune profile of infectious bursal disease. III. Effect of infectious bursal disease virus on the lymphocyte responses to phytomitogens and on mixed lymphocyte reaction of chickens. Avian Diseases 25, 112120.Google Scholar
Tanimura, N and Sharma, JM (1997) Appearance of T cells in the bursa of Fabricius and cecal tonsils during the acute phase of infectious bursal disease virus infection in chickens. Avian Diseases 41, 638645.Google Scholar
van den Berg, TP (2000) Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 29, 175194.Google Scholar
Vervelde, L and Davison, TF (1997) Comparison of the in situ changes in lymphoid cells during infection with infectious bursal disease virus in chickens of different ages. Avian Pathology 26, 803821.Google Scholar
Wang, WQ, Higuchi, CM and Zhang, RQ (1997) Individual and combinatory effects of soy isoflavones on the in vitro potentiation of lymphocyte activation. Nutrition and Cancer 29, 2934.Google Scholar
Yeh, H, Rautenschlein, S and Sharma, JM (2002) Protective immunity against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens in the absence of virus-specific antibodies. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 89, 149158.Google Scholar
Zhang, RQ, Li, YP and Wang, WQ (1997) Enhancement of immune function in mice fed high doses of soy daidzein. Nutrition and Cancer 29, 2428.Google Scholar