Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:40:28.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of date of planting on growth and yield of contrasting potato varieties in Pembrokeshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. Allen
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture (Crop Husbandry) U.C.W., Aberystwyth, Dyfed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four experiments over 2 years which examined the effects of date of planting (from mid-March to early May) on the growth and yield of early, second early and maincrop potato varieties are described. In two experiments the seed used was physiologically old (heavily sprouted) and in the other two experiments relatively young seed (limited sprout development) was used. In the early variety, Home Guard, tuber yield at maturity was unaffected by delay in planting when physiologically old seed was used but increased leaf area and higher tuber yields resulted from later planting of younger seed. With both types of seed the maincrop varieties, Desirée and Maria Piper, produced larger leaf areas from later planting in one year but smaller leaf areas in the other year. In both years with both types of seed, tuber yields at the end of August were higher from the earlier plantings of these varieties. The physiologically young seed of Red Craig's Royal behaved in a similar manner to the maincrop varieties and the physiologically old seed behaved in a similar way to Home Guard.

Any yield advantages of early varieties over maincrop varieties from any date of planting were small and short-lived and the physiological reasons for differences between varieties are discussed in the light of these results. It is suggested that the current classification of varieties is unjustified and that variety testing should take more account of the effects of physiological age.

Tuber yields from the maincrop varieties were very high (60·80 t/ha) and this is attributed to the synchrony of leaf growth and increasing light receipts which may be readily achieved in the mild springs of W. Wales.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 711 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. J. & Wurr, D. C. E. (1973). A comparison of two methods of recording stem densities in the potato crop. Potato Research 16, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, J. L. (1966). The effects of delayed planting and soil consolidation on potato yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, P. M. & Radley, R. W. (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. II. The effects of variety and time of planting on growth, development and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, P. M. & Taha, M. A. (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. I. The effects of variety, seed size and spacing on growth, development and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Webb, D. J. & Wright, E. M. (1973). The effect of time of sowing and harvesting on growth, yield and nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. I. Yield and nitrogen uptake at harvest. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 267–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, G. V. (1956). The effect of date of planting on the yield of potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 47, 122–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, P. W. & Watson, D. J. (1971). An analysis of the effects of nutrient supply on the growth of potato crops. Annals of Applied Biology 69, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunasena, H. P. M. & Harris, P.M. (1971). The effect of CCC, nitrogen and potassium on the growth and yield of two varieties of potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. & Webb, D. J. (1970). The effect of sowing date and harvesting date on the yield of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madec, P. & Perennec, P. (1955). Les possibilités d'évolution des germes de la pomme de terre et leurs conséquences. Annales de l'amélioration des plantes. Paris. 5, 555–74.Google Scholar
Potato Marketing Board (1969). Survey of maincrop potatoes.Google Scholar
Prytherch, E. I. (1975). The effect of practices in seed potato production on the rate of bulking in the early ware crop. Experimental Husbandry 29, 13–22.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K., English, S. D., Wood, D. W. & Unsworth, M. H. (1973). The yield of sugar beet in relation to weather and length of growing season. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1952). Physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4, 101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1975). Relationships between sprouting characters and stem development in two maincrop potato varieties. Potato Research 18, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. & Allen, E. J. (1976). Effects of cold treatments on the sprout growth of three potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 221–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar