Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:33:05.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of chlormequat chloride on yield and components of yield in six cultivars of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. M. White
E. M. White
Affiliation:
Agricultural Botany Research Division, Plant Testing Station, Crossnacreevy, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of chlormequat chloride on grain yield and its components in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare)cultivars were studied in five field experiments conducted at two sites near Belfast over 3 years (1982–84). Grain yield was significantly increased by chlormequat chloride treatment in only one experiment, where ear loss was less in the treated plots. Number of ears per plant was increased by treatment in another experiment but yield was unaffected. It was concluded that chlormequat chloride applications are unlikely to produce consistent yield increases in field crops of spring barley.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 377 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cartwright, P. M. & Waddington, S. R. (1982). Growth regulators and grain yield in spring cereals. In Opportunities for Manipulation of Cereal Productivity (Eds Hawkins, A. F., & Jeffcoat, B.), BPGRG Monograph 7, pp. 61–70. Wantage: British Plant Growth Regulator Group.Google Scholar
Jensen, E. S. & Anderson, A. S. (1981). Effects of growth regulator Terpal (BAS 098 OOW) on morphology and yield of three spring barley cultivars. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 31, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koranteng, G. O. & Matthews, S. (1982). Modifications of the development of spring barley by early applications of CCC and GA3 and the subsequent effects on yield components and yield. In Chemical Manipulation of Crop Growth and Development(Ed. McLaren, J. S.), pp. 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S., Koranteng, G. O. &Thomson, W. J. (1982). Tillering and ear production: opportunities for chemical regulation. In Opportunities for Manipulation of Cereal Productivity (Eds Hawkins, A. F. & Jeffcoat, B.), BPGRG Monograph 7, pp. 88–96. Wantage: British Plant Growth Regulator Group.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. & Thomson, W. J. (1983). New roles for growth regulators in cereal production. In The Yield of Cereals (Ed. Wright, D.W.) pp. 25–31. London: Royal Agricultural Society of England.Google Scholar
Paterson, W. G. W., Blackett, G. A. & Gill, W. D. (1983). Plant growth regulator trials on spring and winter barley. Research and Development Note, Scottish Agricultural Colleges, No. 16.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. T., Naylor, R. E. L. & Matthews, S. (1986). Effects of chlormequat chloride on ear and leaf size at anthesis and final grain yield of shoots of three winter barley cultivars. Annals of Applied Biology, 108, Supplement, 7, 104–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, S. R. & Cartwright, P. (1986). Modification of yield components and stem length in spring barley by the application of growth retardants prior to main shoot stem elongation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, E. W. (1982). Performance of current growth regulators in cereals. In Opportunities for Manipulation of Cereal Productivity (Eds Hawkins, A. F. & Jeffcoat, B.), BPGRG Monograph 7, pp. 44–48. Wantage: British Plant Growth Regulator Group.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C, Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar