Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:33:35.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of chloride fertilizers on yield and uptake of chloride, potassium and sodium by fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in two New Zealand soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. S. Magat  and
K. M. Goh
S. S. Magat
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Development, Philippine Coconut Authority, Manila, Philippines
K. M. Goh
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of applications of sodium chloride (NaCl) and potassium chloride (KCl) ranging from 0 to 720 kg Cl/ha on the yield and uptakes of chloride (Cl) potassium (K) and sodium (Na) by fodder beet were studied in field experiments at two sites in New Zealand. At 360 kg Cl/ha applied, both NaCl (590 kg/ha) and KC1 (758 kg/ha) increased significantly yields of fresh roots, dry roots and fresh sugar content of fodder beet over the minus-Cl plants. Compared with the sulphate anion, chloride application stimulated K uptake in tops and roots. Results indicated that in the beet crop, uptake of K is enhanced with the presence or addition of Cl (as NaCl) compared with SO4 (as NaSO4).

In both soils, total (tops and roots) uptakes of K, Cl, and Na were significantly correlated with fresh roots, dry roots and fresh sugar content. Multiple regression analyses showed that total K uptake was the main nutritional factor which determined yields of fresh and dry roots in the Templeton soil, whilst in the Wakanui soil total Cl uptake and total K+total Cl uptakes determined fresh root and dry root yields, respectively. In both soils, high Cl uptake was required for increased sugar yields.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 207 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S. N. (1961). The effect of sodium and potassium on sugar beet on the Lincolnshire limestone soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. C. & Beadle, N. C. W. (1957). Studies in Halophytes. Salinity factors in the growth of Australian salt bushes. Ecology 38, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broyer, T. G, Carlton, A. B., Johnson, C. M. & Stout, P. R. (1954). Chlorine – a micronutrient for higher plants. Plant Physiology 29, 526–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carran, P. S. (1976). A preliminary study of the efficiency of catch-cans used for irrigation sprinkler testing. New Zealand Agricultural Engineering Institute Internal Report No. 78 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Cope, J. T. Jr, Bradfield, R. & Peech, M. (1953). Effect of sodium fertilization on yield and cation content of some field crops. Soil Science 76, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, E. M. (1947). The use of salt for sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review 16, 19–22.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1972). Sugar Beet Nutrition. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Bugg, S. M. (1982). Response of sugar beet to various amounts and times of application of sodium chloride in relation to soil type. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Cooke, G. W. (1966). The effects of K fertilisers on the quality of sugar beet. Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the International Potash Institute, pp. 131–135, Brussels.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1976). Response by sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers, particularly in relation to soils containing little exchangeable potassium. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Webb, D. J. (1974). Effects of plant density, irrigation, potassium, and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. I. Yields and nutrient composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Farley, R. F. (1971). Effect of sodium and magnesium fertilisers and irrigation on growth, composition and yield of sugar beet. Journal of Science,Food and Agriculture 22, 559–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, E. (1966). Dual pattern of ion absorption by plant cells and by plants. Nature 212, 1324–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasshoff, K. (1970). A simultaneous multiple channel system for nutrient analysis of seawater with analog and digital analog and record. In Advances in Automated Analysis, Technical International Conference (1969), Vol. II, Industrial Analysis, pp. 133–145. Thurman Associated, Florida.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. B. (1980). Sugar beet trials in Otago and Southland, 1936–1976. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 8, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeder, H. E. & Mengel, K. (1972). Translocation and respiration of assimilates in tomato plants as infuenced by K nutrition. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 131, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, A. & Talibudeen, O. (1976). Effects of sodium on the growth of and ion uptake by barley, sugar beet and broad beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartt, C. E. (1970). Effect of potassium upon translocation of 14C in detached leaves of sugar cane. Plant Physiology 45, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R. J. & Goh, K. M. (1980). Distribution and budget of nutrients in a commercial apple orchard. Plant and Soil 56, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C, Gill, W. D., Rodgers, J. B. A., White, G. R. & Jawley, D. N. (1968). Experiments with salt and potash on sugar beet in South-East Scotland. Experimental Husbandry 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
James, D. W., Kidman, D. C., Weaver, W. H. & Reeder, R. L. (1968). Potassium fertilization of sugar beets in central Washington. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 14, 682–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. M., Stout, P. R., Broyer, T. C. & Carlton, A. B. (1957). Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant species. Plant and Soil 8, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardos, N. & Mulcock, A. P. (1977). Ethanol from agricultural crops. New Zealand Energy Research and Development Committee Report No. 28.Google Scholar
Lehr, J. J. (1941). The importance of sodium for plant nutrition. Soil Science 52, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehr, J. J. (1942). The importance of sodium for plant nutrition. III. The equilibrium of cations in the beet. Soil Science 53, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, P. M., Gallagher, P. A., Kearney, P. & Carroll, P. (1966). Fertiliser use and sugar beet quality in Ireland. Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the Potash Institute, pp. 107–126, Brussels.Google Scholar
Magat, S. S. (1985). Field studies on some effects of chloride fertilizers on the growth, yield and nutrient status of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and on some soil properties of two New Zealand soils. Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln College, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Mannan, M. A. (1984). Plant growth and yield in beet in response to reduced plant numbers. Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln College, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Mengel, K. & Viro, M. (1974). Effect of potassium supply on the transport of photosynthates to the fruits of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Plant Physiology 30, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. (1976). Sugar concentration in sugar beet; varietal differences and the effects of soil type and planting density on size of root cells. Annals of Applied Biology 83, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pescini, M. S. & McCrone, J. (1980). Fodder beet growing: Manawatu/Horowhenua areas. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1952). Sodium as a plant nutrient. Royal Agricultural Society of England Journal 113, 145–156.Google Scholar
Sayre, C. B. & Shafer, J. I. (1944). Effect of side-dressings of different sodium and nitrogenous salts on the yield of beets. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticulture 44, 453–456.Google Scholar
Stephen, R. C, Kemp, T. N. & Todd, B. W. (1980). A preliminary investigation into the fertilizer requirement of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Monoblanc) on some Canterbury soils. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 10, 5–8.Google Scholar
Technicon Autoanayzer Methodology (1970). Chloride. Technicon Laboratory Method, file N56 I/II. New York: Technicon Corp.Google Scholar
Terry, N. (1977). Photosynthesis, growth, and role of chloride. Plant Physiology 60, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, P. B. H. (1965). The effects of nitrogen, potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science 65, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tottingham, W. E. (1919). A preliminary study of the influence of chlorides on the growth of certain agricultural plants. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 11, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, A. & Ohki, K. (1956). Chlorine, bromine and sodium as nutrients for sugar beet plants. Plant Physiology 31, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weatherburn, M. W. (1967). Phenol–hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar