Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:30:30.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of water stress on grain filling processes in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2001

A. AHMADI  and
D. A. BAKER
A. AHMADI
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK Present address: Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
D. A. BAKER
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of water stress, commencing from the late cell division period, on in vivo grain growth was studied in relation to grain sucrose, water status and in vitro starch synthesis. Detached ear experiments were conducted to assess the effect of sink dehydration on grain filling processes under non-limiting source conditions. Water stress caused premature grain desiccation and resulted in a marked decline in grain sucrose and reduced grain weight. Both sucrose uptake and conversion to starch in vitro were increased by mild water stress (solute potential (Ψs)−0·8 MPa). However, a decline in Ψs below this optimum resulted in reduced sucrose uptake and starch synthesis not attributable to a reduced supply of sucrose. Stressed grains which failed to accumulate dry matter in vivo showed significant starch synthesis when cultured in vitro. Grains from in situ and osmotically stressed plants showed a lower capacity for starch synthesis in vitro. The results indicate that grain filling processes under stress conditions are limited by (1) low substrate availability and low Ψs within the sink i.e. an unfavourable seed environment (non-lasting effect) and (2) reduced synthetic capacity of the sink (carry-over effect).

Type
CROPS AND SOILS
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 136 , Issue 3 , May 2001 , pp. 257 - 269
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)