Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:40:51.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of virginiamycin on digestibility of nutrients, blood and immunologic parameters, and quality of meat in veal calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. Skřivanová ,
M. Marounek ,
J. Šimůnek  and
V. Benda
V. Skřivanová
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague IO-Uhřiněves, Czech Republic
M. Marounek
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Prague 10-Uhřiněves, Czech Republic
J. Šimůnek
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Prague 10-Uhřiněves, Czech Republic
V. Benda
Affiliation:
Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague 6-Dejvice, Czech Republic.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments were carried out in 1992 with ten male calves, 4 weeks old initially, on a milk diet. Five calves received 80 mg/head virginiamycin (a feed antibiotic) daily for about 14 weeks. Virginiamycin significantly (P < 0·05) increased weight gains (122±2 kg ν. 114±2 kg), digestibility of ash, serum iron and haemoglobin. The feed intake per 1 kg of gain was non-significantly lowered in the virginiamycin group. The phagocytic activity of granulocytes in blood samples of treated calves was slightly increased with a concomitant decrease in the concentration of immunoglobulins. Meat of virginiamycin-fed calves tended to be somewhat darker, to contain more K, Na and Fe and to have a higher pH 24 h post mortem. There were no major differences in other qualitative characteristics of meat between the groups.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 123 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 275 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1980). Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Benda, V. & Hošpes, J. (1991). Phagocytic activity of leucocytes in sheep and goats. Ada Veterinaria, Brno 60, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daenicke, R. (1988). Zur Wirksamkeit des Leistungsförderers Stafac Virginiamycin in der Kälberaufzucht. Rinderwell, 99–101.Google Scholar
Diemair, W. (1963). Laboratoriumsbuch für den Lebens-mittelchemiker.Dresden and Leipzig: Theodor Steikopflf Verlag.Google Scholar
Gottschall, D. W., Gombatz, C. & Wang, R. (1987). Analysis of tissue residues and comparative metabolism of virginiamycin in rats, turkeys, and cattle. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 35, 900–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. L., Drevjany, L. A., Allen, O. B. & Reasbeck, L. M. (1988). Supplementation of skim milk fed to veal calves: carcass characteristics, chemical, instrumental, and sensory parameters. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68, 1069–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küther, K. (1975). Stafac® Virginiamycin – der neue Wachstumförderer für Kälber. Lohman Information, Cuxhaven, 11–14.Google Scholar
Marounek, M., Podsedníĉek, M. & Petr, O. (1992). Effect of virginiamycin on performance and rumen parameters of young calves. Živočišná výroba 37, 721–726.Google Scholar
Palisa, V. (1978). Method for evaluation of phagocytic activity in vitro (in Czech). Imunologický zpravodaj 9, 42–44.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R. (1978). Untersuchung zur Wirksamkeit von Virginiamycin in Milchaustauschern für Mastkalber. Lohman Information, Cuxhaven, 9–12.Google Scholar
Rai-El-Balhaa, G., Pellerin, J. L., Bodin, G., Abdullah, A. & Hiron, H. (1985). Lymphoblastic transformation assay of sheep peripheral blood lymphocytes.: a new rapid and easy-to-read technique. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 8, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberfroid, M. B. & Dumont, P. A. (1972). Absorption and metabolism of tritium-labelled factor M1 of virginiamycin by oral and parenteral administration. Journal of Antibiotics 25, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, J. A. & Kaeberle, M. L. (1981). Evaluation of bovine polymorphonuclear leucocyte function. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 2, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skřivanová, V. & Marounek, M. (1993). Effect of virginiamycin on feed intake, daily gains, ruminal volatile fatty acids and blood parameters in veal calves. Archives of Animal Nutrition 44, 41–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Spears, J. W. (1990). Ionophores and nutrient digestion and absorption in ruminants. Journal of Nutrition 120, 632–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolo, K., Schenk, K. & Brandzaeg, P. (1981). Enzymelinked immunosorbent assay for human IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies to antigens from anaerobic cultures of seven oral bacteria. Journal of Immunological Methods 45, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed