Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:50:03.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of the apetalous flower character on radiation distribution in the crop canopy, yield and its components in oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. S. S. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
N. J. Mendham
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
G. C. Buzza
Affiliation:
Pacific Seeds, Alderley Street, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia

Summary

A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals. Experiments between 1984 and 1987 used different growth regulators, plant population densities and irrigation treatments. Apetalous allowed 30 % more short-wave radiation to reach the base of the inflorescence, and reflected only half as much radiation as Marnoo at peak flowering. This allowed leaves to persist and remain active for longer. Apetalous then consistently retained more seeds/pod, each of greater mean weight, at all heights within the crop canopy, resulting in substantially greater yields than Marnoo in most instances. At the highest population density, it retained productive secondary branches, whereas Marnoo had none. Irrigation after flowering increased the yields of both lines by allowing more seeds/pod to be retained, particularly at lower heights in the canopy. In Apetalous, however, even without irrigation, yields remained high. Apetalous does have larger flower parts, other than petals, which could contribute to the larger pods and seeds. This, combined with lower plant populations than Marnoo in some experiments, could have explained some of the effects seen, but the characteristic is worthy of further study in a range of genetic backgrounds and environments.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buzza, G. C. (1983). The inheritance of an apetalous flower character in Canola (Brassica napus). Cruciferae Newsletter 8, 1112.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. F., Scarisbrick, D. H. & Daniels, R. W. (1984). Field studies on 14C assimilate fixation and movement in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, R. W., Scarisbrick, D. H. & Smith, L. J. (1986). Oilseed rape physiology. In Oilseed Rape (Eds Scarisbrick, D. H. & Daniels, R. W.), pp. 83126. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Krogman, K. K. & Hobbs, E. H. (1975). Yield and morphological response of rape (Brassica campestris L.) cv. Span to irrigation and fertilizer treatments. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 903909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J. & Scott, R. K. (1975). The limiting effect of plant size at inflorescence initiation on subsequent growth and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 487502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. J. & Scott, R. K. (1981 a). The effects of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 389416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. J. & Scott, R. K. (1981 b). The effects of seed size, autumn nitrogen and plant population density on the response to delayed sowing in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 417428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Russell, J. & Buzza, G. C. (1984). The contribution of seed survival to yield in new Australian cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 303316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, M. S. S. & Mendham, N. J. (1991 a). Comparison of chinoli (Brassica campestris subsp. oleifera × subsp. chinensis) and B. napus oilseed rape using different growth regulators, plant population densities and irrigation treatments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 117, 177187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, M. S. S. & Mendham, N. J. (1991 b). Soil-plant-water relations of oilseed rape (Brassica napus and B. campestris). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 117, 197205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, D. J. & Steven, M. D. (1987). Reflexion and absorption of solar radiation by flowering canopies of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 495502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar