Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:04:26.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of temperature, humidity and atmosphere on the viability of Chewing's Fescue grass seed in storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Gane
Affiliation:
Low Temperature Research Station, University of Cambridge

Summary

The loss of viability of seeds of Chewing's Fescue Grass has been a serious problem to both the producers in New Zealand and the trade in the United Kingdom. It has been shown by Foy (1934) that seeds with a high moisture content (20 %) held at 30° C. deteriorated rapidly after 10–14 days and even more quickly at 40° and 50° C. Seeds with a water content of 13 % deteriorated more slowly but it was not until the water content was reduced to and maintained at 5 % that seeds retained their viability at 30°, 40° or 50° C. for 42 days. Even at room temperature (16–20° C.) the loss of viability occurred after 4–5 months at 20 % water content and after 8–9 months at 13 % but at 5 % water content there was no loss. Foy discusses the effects of temperature and humidity that may occur during transport; Hyde (1935) has examined the effect of heating seeds to 50°, 60°, 70°, 80° and 90° C. with a view to working out the conditions for artificial drying of the seeds before transport, and Lewis (1934) has found that, in some seasons, there was a marked loss of viability in storing these seeds in the United Kingdom.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Foy, N. R. (1934). N. Z. J. Agric. 49, 1024.Google Scholar
Gane, R. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, E. O. C. (1935). N. Z. J. Agric. 51, 4042.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. G. (1934). N. Z. J. Agric. 49, 69.Google Scholar