Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T08:23:25.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sulphur on the yield and chemical composition of winter barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. M. Scott ,
P. W. Dyson ,
J. Ross  and
G. S. Sharp
N. M. Scott
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen
P. W. Dyson
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen
J. Ross
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen
G. S. Sharp
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The changeover from fertilizers containing calcium or ammonium sulphate to those containing little or no sulphur has led to the occurrence of sulphur deficiency in many areas of the world (McNaught & Christoffels, 1961). In the United Kingdom, it was thought that even in the absence of fertilizer sulphur, atmospheric inputs were sufficient to ensure an adequate supply for crops. Recent work in the north of Scotland has shown that this is not so, that many soils in the area are low in sulphur, and yield responses have been obtained following application of sulphur to grass (Soott et al. 1983; Scott, 1984). The purpose of the present experiments was to extend the work to cereals, in particular to examine the response to added sulphur of the grain yield of winter barley, and to measure the effect of sulphur on the chemical composition of plants.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 699 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crooke, W. M. & Simpson, W. E. (1971). Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freney, J. R., Spencer, J. & Jones, M. B., (1978). Determining the sulphur status of wheat. Sulphur in Agriculture, vol. 2, pp. 2–5, Sulphur Institute, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. M. & Nishita, H. (1952). Micro-escimation of sulphur in plant materials, soils and irrigation waters. Analytical Chemistry 24, 736–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaught, K. J. & Christoffels, P. E. (1961). Effect of sulphur deficiency on sulphur and nitrogen levels in pastures and lucerne. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 4, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K. & Hutton, J. T. (1977). Plant analysis by X-ray spectrometry. X-ray Spectrometry 6, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, N. M. (1984). Sulphur in Soils and Grassland 24, 20–23. Aberdeen: North of Scotland Grassland Society, Norgrass.Google Scholar
Scott, N. M., Watson, M., Caldwell, K. S. & Inkson, R. H. E. (1983). Response of grassland to the application of sulphur at two sites in north-east Scotland. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C, Chang, T. T., Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar