Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T15:32:05.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sodium chloride supplementation of a sodium adequate hay on digestion, production and mineral nutrition in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Moseley  and
D. I. H. Jones
G. Moseley
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth
D. I. H. Jones
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four groups of six 18-month-old wethers were fed a diet of hay ad libitum with a pelleted ground barley supplement for 70 days. The control group received no further dietary supplements and the sodium content (0·46%) was above that recommended by published standards. Groups 2, 3 and 4 received supplements of sodium chloride, mixed and pelleted with the barley, to provide a final dietary concentration of 1·7, 2·5 and 3·1% sodium respectively.

Dry-matter intake, dry organic-matter intake and digestible organic matter in dry matter (DOMD) were significantly reduced (P < 0·01) at the highest sodium intake. There was a reduction in live-weight gain and efficiency of utilization of digestible organic matter with increasing sodium chloride supplementation, with significant differences (P < 0·05) between the highest and lowest sodium intake groups.

There were no consistent or significant changes in the serum concentrations of sodium or potassium following sodium chloride supplementation, but serum calcium and magnesium levels were significantly lowered as a result of sodium chloride supplementation.

Sodium chloride supplementation improved the apparent availability of sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium but reduced that of phosphorus and nitrogen. The retention of Na, K, Mg, P and N was lower at the highest sodium intake but Ca retention was higher. Urine volume and excretion of Na, K, Mg, Ca, P and N increased with sodium chloride intake.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

A.R.C. (1965). The Nutrient Requirement of Farm Livestock. No. 2 Ruminants. A.R.C. London.Google Scholar
Chicco, C. F., Shultz, T. A., Rias, J., Plasse, D. & Burguera, M. (1971). Self feeding salt supplement to grazing steers under tropical conditions. Journal of Animal Science 33, 142–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlin, T. J. & Roberts, W. K. (1963). Dietary maintenance requirement of sodium for wether lambs. Journal of Animal Science 22, 648–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ap Griffith, G. (1964). Nitrogen and the nutritive value of grass. Span 7, 18–20.Google Scholar
ap Griffith, G., Jones, D. I. H. & Walters, R. J. K. (1965). Specific and varietal differences in sodium and potassium in grasses. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 16, 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ap Griffith, G. & Walters, R. J. K. (1966). The sodium and potassium content of some grass genera, species and varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. M., Kromann, R. P. & Ray, E. E. (1971). Energy retention in lambs as influenced by various levels of sodium and potassium in the rations. Journal of Animal Science 33, 872–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroger, D. & Carroll, F. B. (1964). Possible mechanism of agricultural gypsum in regulating appetite. Journal of Animal Science 23, 1011–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kromann, R. P. & Ray, E. E. (1967). Energy metabolism in sheep as influenced by interactions among nutritional and genetic factors. Journal of Animal Science 26, 1379–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehr, J. J. (1960). The sodium content of meadow grass in relation to species and fertilization. Proceedings of the 8th International Grassland Congress, Reading, pp. 101–3.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. B., Macvicar, R. W., Archer, Jr. W. & Meiske, J. C. (1955). Effect of high salt intake on the digestibility of ration constituents and on nitrogen, sodium and chloride retention by steers and wethers. Journal of Animal Science, 14 825–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. M. (1972). Production disease. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 133, 69–86.Google Scholar
Riggs, J. K., Colby, R. W. & Sells, L. V. (1953). The effect of self-feeding salt—cotton-seed meal mixture to beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 12, 379–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomas, F. M., Jones, G. B., Potter, B. J. & Langsford, G. L. (1973). Influence of saline drinking water on mineral balances in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1966). The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Farnham Royal, Berks.Google Scholar
Walker, D. J., Potter, B. J. & Jones, G. B. (1971). Modification of carcass characteristics in sheep maintained on a saline water regime. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 11, 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, W. C. & Miller, R. F. (1954). The use of salt as a regulator of protein supplement intake by breeding ewes. Journal of Animal Science 12, 219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, W. C. & Torrell, D. T. (1953). Salt-cotton-seed meal mixture as a supplement for breeding ewes on the range. Journal of Animal Science 12, 353–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. (1966). Nutrient Minerals in Grass and Herbage. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, no. 1/1966, Farnham Royal, Bucks.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D. & Dudzinski, M. L. (1973). Influence of the concentration and volume of saline water on the food intake of sheep, and on their excretion of sodium and water in urine and faeces. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar