Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:41:43.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of sample date and plant density on the carbohydrate content of forage maize and the changes that occur on ensiling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. B. McAllan
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
R. H. Phipps
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

The (early maturing) maize hybrid, Anjou 210, was sown on 1 May (1975) and 50000 (LD) and 150000 (HD) plants/ha established. Leaf, stem, ear and husk components of the shoots, and whole shoots were separately examined for changes in dry weight, soluble sugars, starch, hemicellulose and cellulose at regular intervals from 104 to 154 days after planting together with whole shoots after ensiling.

Throughout the sampling period whole shoot and ear dry weights increased steadily whereas those of leaf and stem decreased in plants from both treatments.

Total soluble sugar contents for plants grown at LD were at a maximum 104 days after planting compared with 125 days after planting for the HD crop. Immediately prior to ensiling whole shoot soluble sugar content was 74 and 93 g/kg D.M. for LD and HD treatments respectively.

Small amounts of starch (g/kg D.M.) were found in stems (10–25), husks (40–80) and leaves (17–35) of plants grown at both densities. The starch content of the ear increased from 57 to 390 g/kg D.M. and 168 to 376 g/kg D.M. in plants grown at LD and HD respectively.

For plants from both treatments hemicellulose contents of husks, leaves and whole shoots increased with age whereas those of stems decreased. Cellulose contents did not vary greatly over the growing season.

On ensiling plants from both densities, total soluble sugars had virtually disappeared after only 3 days. Apparent losses (approximately 0·3 g/g), over a longer period of time, were observed in hemicellulose sugars and starch. Apparent increases were observed in cellulose contents of approximately 0·15 g/g.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelana, B. O. & Milbourn, G. M. (1972). The growth of maize 11. Dry matter partition of three maize hybrids. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 73–8.Google Scholar
Allison, J. C. S. (1971). Analysis of growth and yield of inbred and crossbred maize. Annals of Applied Biology 69, 8192.Google Scholar
Allison, J. C. S. & Watson, D. J. (1966). The production and distribution of dry matter in maize after flowering. Annals of Botany 30, 365–81.Google Scholar
Allison, J. C. S. & Weinmann, H. (1970). Effect of absence of developing grain on carbohydrate content and senescence of maize leaves. Plant Physiology 46, 435–6.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1975). The question of grain content and forage quality in maize: comparisons between isogenic fertile and sterile plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 455–63.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. M. (1964). Influence of seed formation of corn on the accumulation of vegetative dry matter and stalk strength. Crop Science 4, 31–4.Google Scholar
Daynard, T. B. & Hunter, R. B. (1975). Relationships among whole plant moisture, grain moisture, dry matter yield and quality of whole crop silage. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 7784.Google Scholar
Daynard, T. B., Tanner, J. W. & Hunter, R. B. (1969). The contribution of stalk soluble carbohydrates to grain yield in corn. Crop Science 9, 831–34.Google Scholar
Demarquilly, C. (1969). Valeur alimentaire du mais fourage. I. Composition chimique et digestibilité du mais sur pied. Annales de Zootechnie 18, 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, H. & Barnes, M. D. (1965). Improved method for determining dry matter in silage. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1324–8.Google Scholar
Focke, R., Franzke, W. & Winkel, A. (1966). Trockensubstanz-zucker und- proteinbildung in befruchtetem und nioht befruchtetem mais. Albrecht-Thaer-Archiv 10, 585600.Google Scholar
Gorsline, G. W. (1961). Silage studies. United Slates Department of Agriculture Mimeo CR-26–61.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. J. (1962). Corn growth and composition in relation to soil fertility. I. Growth of different plant parts and relation between leaf weight and grain yield. Agronomy Journal 54, 145–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanway, J. J. & Russell, W. A. (1969). Dry matter accumulation in corn (Zea mays L.) plants: comparison among single cross hybrids. Agronomy Journal 61, 947–51.Google Scholar
Jain, R. C. (1971). Contribution of stem, laminae and ear to the dry matter production of maize after ear emergence. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 41, 579–83.Google Scholar
Jones, W. G. & Huston, H. A. (1914). Composition of maize at various stages of growth. Indiana Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, No. 175.Google Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1974). Carbohydrate metabolism in the ruminant. Bacterial carbohydrates formed in the rumen and their contribution to digesta entering the duodenum. British Journal of Nutrition 31, 7788.Google Scholar
Martens, J. W. & Arny, D. C. (1967). Nitrogen and sugar levels of pith tissue of corn as influenced by plant age and potassium chloride ion fertilisation. Agronomy Journal 591, 332–4.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. F. E., Heichel, G. H. & Musgrove, R. B. (1973). Patterns of translocation, respiratory loss and redistribution of 14C in maize after flowering. Crop Science 13, 371–6.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1973). Influence of drying and storage conditions on nonstructural carbohydrate analysis of herbage tissue. A review. Journal of the British Grassland Society 28, 129–34.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1971). Investigations of carbohydrate metabolism in the alimentary tract of the ruminating calf. Automation in Analytical Chemistry (Technicon Symposium, 1969), p. 207, Basingstoke, Hants: Technicon Instruments Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1974). Some factors influencing the chemical composition of mixed rumen bacteria. British Journal of Nutrition 31, 2734.Google Scholar
Van Eijnatten, C. L. M. (1963). A study of the Development of two varieties of maize at Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Reen, R. & Singleton, W. R. (1952). Sucrose content in the stalks of maize inbreds. Agronomy Journal 44, 610–14.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1973). Determination of acid-detergent fibre. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 4, 781–4.Google Scholar
Welton, F. A., Morris, V. H. & Hartzler, A. J. (1930). Distribution of moisture, dry matter and sugars in the maturing corn stem. Plant Physiology 5, 555–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, J. M. & Osbourn, D. F. (1975). Objectives in breeding forage maize for improved nutritive value. Sth Congress of Eucarpia, Versailles. 09 1975 (In press).Google Scholar