Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:34:39.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of pod removal on the reproductive development of Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Provider

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. O. Olufajo
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
D. H. Scarisbrick
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
R. W. Daniels
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent

Summary

Phaseolus vulgaris (cv. Provider) was assessed as a vegetable and seed crop in southeast England. Experiments were designed to simulate ‘pick your own’ harvest systems which are becoming increasingly popular. Edible pods were removed on either one or two occasions at varying developmental stages, remaining pods being left to produce seed. The yield of edible pods increased considerably as pod removal was delayed but subsequent seed yield was reduced. However, depodded plants showed compensatory increases in mean seed weight so that seed yield reduction was less than expected.

Results are discussed in relation to decline in seed moisture content and the dual use of this crop for vegetable pod and seed. It is concluded that dual use is not convenient for large-scale agricultural operations. ‘Pick your own’ programmes utilize the potential of this crop more efficiently than present mechanical harvesting systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hardwick, R. C., Andrews, D. J. & Hardaker, J. M. (1975). Plant studies. Report National Vegetable Research Station for 1974, pp. 6567.Google Scholar
Hole, C. C. & Hardwick, R. C. (1978). Chemical aids to drying seeds of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) before harvest. Annals of Applied Biology 88, 421427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, L. K. (1973). Mechanical damage and processing loss during Navy bean harvesting. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 16, 10471050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarisbrick, D. H., Clewer, A. & Wilkes, J. M. (1978). A summary of the effect of drilling date on the seed yield of the Navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) during 1972–1976. Experimental Husbandry 34, 103117.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, D. H., Wilkes, J. M. & Kempson, R. (1977). The effect of varying plant population density on the seed yield of Navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in south-east England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 567577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seth, A. K. & Wareing, P. F. (1967). Hormonedirected transport of metabolites and its possible role in plant senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 18, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. & Bass, M. H. (1972). Relationship of artificial pod removal to soya bean yields. Journal of Economic Entomology 65, 606608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1977). Effect of flower or pod removal on the performance of soya beans (Olycine max. L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 229234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wien, H. C., Sandsted, R. F. & Wallace, D. H. (1973). The influence of flower removal on growth and seed yield of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 98, 4549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar