Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:22:23.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of high air temperature on reproduction in the ewe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. T. M. Yeates
Affiliation:
Sir William Macgregor School of Physiology, University of Queensland

Extract

Six Romney Marsh ewes exposed daily in a hot-room to temperatures averaging 105° F. dry bulb and 87° F. wet bulb for 2 months prior to the start of the breeding season all experienced oestrus and, as a group, at the same time of year as non-heated controls.

However, when maintained under daily hot-room treatment throughout the pregnancy period only one ewe lambed, suggesting an adverse effect of high temperature on gestation.

In a further experiment to confirm this, eight control ewes all lambed, average birth weight of lambs being 9 lb. 5 oz. Of six experimental ewes exposed to temperatures of 107° F. (dry bulb) and 92° F. (wet bulb) for 7 hr. daily during the last third of pregnancy, one failed to lamb and the lambs averaged 7 lb. 15 oz. A further six experimental ewes exposed to similar room conditions for the last two-thirds of pregnancy produced still smaller lambs, averaging 6 lb. 11 oz. at birth, and three ewes failed to lamb.

The yield of lamb per ewe was 9 lb. 5 oz. for controls, 7 lb. 13 oz. and 4 lb. 1 oz. for ewes exposed to heat during the final third and two-thirds of pregnancy respectively and, in the previous year's experiment, 1 lb. 2 oz. for those exposed throughout the pre-mating, mating and post-mating period.

It is concluded that although high temperature is apparently without effect on the incidence of oestrus in sheep, it is inimical to satisfactory gestation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barcroft, J. (1946). Researches on Pre-natal Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bonsma, J. C. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 204.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C., Sandeks, R. N. & Granger, W. (1942). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 148.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Berliner, V. (1937). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 265.Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Phillips, R. W. (1933). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 328.Google Scholar
Moule, G. R. (1953). Aust. Vet. J. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Ogle, C. (1934). Amer. J. Physiol. 107, 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. W. & McKenzie, F. F. (1934). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 217.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Brody, S., Thompson, H. J. & Worstell, D. M. (1948). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 425.Google Scholar
Sundstroem, E. S. (1927). Physiol. Rev. 7, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Dep. Agric. (1950). Report of Chief, Bureau Animal Industry.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar