Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:18:15.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of ammonium on anion uptake and trans-root potential in sunflower roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. M. Ragab
Affiliation:
Soils Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Al Azhar, Cairo, Egypt

Summary

Studies were made on detopped sunflower plants to see whether the depolarizing effect of NH4 on the trans-root potential is the result of increasing H2PO4 uptake and to determine the effect of NH4 on the flux of NO3 and SO4 in xylem exudate. Increasing the NH4 in the medium increased the H2PO4 flux in the exudate, but decreased NO3 and SO4 fluxes. Ammonium and NO3 influenced the uptake of each other but NH4 had the greater effect. These NH4 effects were attributed wholly or in part to blockage of the root metabolism which may have affected the permeability of root cell membranes. Therefore, the stimulation of H2PO4 flux by NH4 was probably not attributable to any specific effect of NH4 on H2PO4 uptake. Enhanced H2PO4 and decreased uptake of NO3 and SO4 reflects toxic effects of NH4 on the root metabolism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, W. P. & Collins, J. C. (1969). The exudation from excised maize roots bathed in sulphate media. Journal of Experimental Botany 20, 7280.Google Scholar
Bardsley, C. E. (1960). Absorption of sulphur from organic sources by bush beans. Agronomy Journal 52, 485490.Google Scholar
Barker, A. V., Volk, R. J. & Jackson, W. A. (1965). Effect of ammonium and nitrate nutrition on dark respiration of excised bean leaves. Crop Science 5, 439444.Google Scholar
Becking, J. H. (1956). On the mechanism of ammonium ion uptake by maize roots. Acta Botanica Netherland 5, 18.Google Scholar
Blair, F. J., Miller, M. H. & Mitchell, W. A. (1970). Nitrate and ammonium as sources of nitrogen for corn and their influence on the uptake of other ions. Agronomy Journal 62, 530532.Google Scholar
Bowling, D. J. F. (1976). Uptake of Ions in Plant Hoots, pp. 5272. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Breteler, H. (1973). A comparison between ammonium and nitrate nutrition of young sugar beet plant grown in nutrient solution at constant acidity. I. Production of dry matter, ionic balance and chemical composition. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 21, 227244.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. H. & Pratt, P. F. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants, and Waters. University of California, Division of Agriculture Science, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Dijkshoorn, W. & Van Wijk, A. L. (1967). The sulphur requirements of plants as influenced by sulphur nitrogen ratio in the organic matter. A review of published data. Plant and Soil 26, 129157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, A. & Torii, K. (1961). Physiology of sulphate on higher plants. I. Effect of sulphur deficiency on metabolism of higher plants. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 277290.Google Scholar
Gibbs, M. & Cola, N. (1959). Factors affecting lightinduced fixation of CO2 by isolated spinach chloroplasts. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 34, 318323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, T.Takaki, H., Yamada, Y. (1968). Effect of nitrogen source on the chemical components in young plants. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 14, 4755.Google Scholar
Kirkby, E. A. & Mengel, K. (1967). Ionic balance in different tissues of tomato plant in relation to nitrate, urea, or ammonium nutrition. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 42, 614.Google Scholar
Klemm, K. (1967). The effect of nitrogen form on the nutrient uptake by plants. Bodenkultur 18, 210228.Google Scholar
Leonce, F. S. & Miller, M. H. (1966). A physiological effect of nitrogen on phosphorus absorption by corn. Agronomy Journal 58, 245249.Google Scholar
Lycklama, J. C. (1963). The absorption of ammonium and nitrate by perennial ryegrass. Acta Botanica Netherland 21, 316323.Google Scholar
Minotti, P. L., Wiliams, D. C. & Jackson, W. A. (1969). The influence of ammonium nitrate reduction in wheat seedlings. Planta (Berlin) 86, 267271.Google Scholar
Parr, J. F. & Norman, A. G. (1963). A procedure for control of pH in cation uptake studies with excised barley roots. Soil Science Society American Proceedings 27, 531534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, J. F. & Norman, A. G. (1964).pH control in nitrate uptake studies with excised roots. Plant and Soil 21, 185190.Google Scholar
Pate, J. S. (1969). The movement of nitrogenous solutes in plants. In Coordination Meeting on Recent Development in the use of N15 in Soil–Plant Studies, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Pill, W. G. & Lambeth, V. N. (1977). Effect of NH4 and NO3 nutrition with and without pH adjustment on tomato growth, ion composition, and water relations. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 102, 7881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puritch, G. S. & Barker, A. V. (1967). Structure and function of tomato leaf chloroplasts during ammonium toxicity. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 42, 12291238.Google Scholar
Ragab, S. M. (1972). Ionic balance and plant growth with special reference to carboxylate ion. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Al Azhar, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Ragab, S. M. (1979). Effect of ammonium on the regulation of sodium transport in Helianthus annuus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 505508.Google Scholar
Ragab, S. M. (1980). Water uptake and trans-potential in sunflower roots as influenced by ammonium ions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 145150.Google Scholar
Rao, K. P. & Rains, D. W. (1976). Nitrate absorption by barley. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 57, 5558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharader, I. E., Domsko, D., Junge, P. E. & Peterson, L. A. (1972). Uptake and assimilation of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen and their influence on the growth of corn (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal 64, 690695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar