Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:32:45.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of adding a compound feed to herbage, at the time of ensiling, on intake and milk yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman ,
S. P. Williams ,
T. D. A. Brigstocke  and
D. H. Baker
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
S. P. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
T. D. A. Brigstocke
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB, UK
D. H. Baker
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The idea that the addition of compound feed to grass at ensilage can result in adequate preservation of the crop without the need for an acid additive, and that less compound feed would then need to be given when the silage is subsequently fed, was tested with dairy cows. Two diets were compared: (1) a conventional grass silage, to which acid had been added at the time of ensiling, plus concentrates supplied at the time of feeding, and (2) grass silage, to which a compound feed had been added at the time of ensiling, plus a lower rate of concentrates. Each diet was fed to 12 lactating cows for 82 days.

The total intake of dry matter was 17·3 kg per cow per day on diet 1 and 18·3 kg on diet 2. Daily milk yields per cow were 24·5 and 26·1 kg, respectively, with similar milk composition. The estimated diet costs per kg of milk were 9·3 p on (1) and 8·3 p on (2). It is concluded that the addition of compound feed to grass at ensilage is worth considering on dairy farms as an alternative to conventional grass silage, but that a more comprehensive study is needed.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 87 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dulphy, J.-P. & Demarquilly, C. (1975). Incorporation de pulpe seche de betteraves dans l'ensilage d'herbe: utilisation par les vaches laitieres. Bulletin Technique, Centre de Recherches Zootechniques et Ve'terinaires de Theix 22, 45–52.Google Scholar
Givens, D. I. (1986). New methods for predicting the nutritive value of silage. In Developments in Silage 1986: Proceedings of a Seminar held at Cannock, Staffordshire (Eds Stark, B. & Wilkinson, M.), pp. 66–75. Marlow: Chalcombe Publications.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. H., Irvin, H. M., Melin, C. G., Wiseman, H. G. & McCalmont, J. R. (1957). Some experiments in preservation of high-moisture hay-crop silages. Journal of Dairy Science 40, 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. I. H., Jones, R. & Moseley, G. (1990). Effect of incorporating rolled barley in autumn-cut ryegrass silage on effluent production, silage fermentation and cattle performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 115, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. J., Clifton, C. M. & Cameron, N. W. (1962). Nutrient losses and silage quality as affected by rate of filling and soybran flakes. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1986). The Analysis of Agricultural Materials, 3rd Edn. Reference Book 427. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Moore, C. A. (1990). The effects of sugar beet pulp based absorbents on effluent production, silage fermentation and the performance of growing cattle. Research Meeting No. 2, British Grassland Society, September 1990, Session VII, Paper 3. Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Small, J. C. & Gordon, F. J. (1988). The effect of system of harvesting grass for silage on the output of silage and milk per hectare. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spörndly, R., Burstedt, E. & Lingvall, P. (1983). Grass/grain silage for lactating dairy cows. In Efficient Grassland Farming: Proceedings of the 9th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation (Ed. Corrall, A. J.), pp. 247–250. Occasional Symposium of the British Grassland Society, No. 14. Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. A. (1977). An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K. (1978). The problem of silage effluent. Herbage Abstracts 48, 397–403.Google Scholar