Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:04:45.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dwarfism does not modify mean area per leaf and light interception in indeterminate autumn-sown white lupin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. Harzic  and
C. Huyghe
N. Harzic
Affiliation:
Station d'Amélioration des Plantes Fourragères, INRA, 86600 Lusignan, France
C. Huyghe
Affiliation:
Station d'Amélioration des Plantes Fourragères, INRA, 86600 Lusignan, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of dwarfism on leaf number and size was investigated on six pairs of tall and dwarf nearisogenic lines of indeterminate autumn-sown white lupins (Lupinus albus L.). Dwarfism reduced mainstem height by 41% and first-order branch length by 22%. It also slightly decreased the number of leaves on the mainstem and first-order branches without affecting the time of flowering. Leaf size was not reduced. Logistic equations were used to analyse differences in the patterns of light interception by leaf canopies relative to thermal time from sowing during the growth of seven dwarf lines and three tall cultivars sown on different dates. The genotypes studied had long periods of low light interception during their early growth. No differences were found between most of the equation parameters for dwarf and tall genotypes. Only the proportion of light intercepted at flowering differed and this was explained by differences in flowering time. The dwarf character did not limit the ability of the crop canopies to intercept light. It is concluded that the character can be introduced into a wide range of genetic backgrounds without deleterious effects.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , November 1996 , pp. 337 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Board, J. E. & Harville, B. G. (1992). Explanations for greater light interception in narrow- vs. wide-row soybean. Crop Science 32, 198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brougham, R. W. (1956). Effect of intensity of defoliation on regrowth of pasture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Edwards, D. A. & Lawn, R. J. (1984). Light interception by grain legume row crops. Plant, Cell and Environment 7, 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dineshkumar, S. P., Shashidhar, V. R., Ravikumar, R. L., Seetharam, A. & Gowda, B. T. S. (1992). Identification of true genetic dwarfing sources in foxtail millet (Setaria italica Beauv.). Euphytica 60, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. G. (1986). Planting patterns and soybean yields. Crop Science 26, 584–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duthion, C. & Ney, B. (1992). Dry matter accumulation and seed number formation in relation to radiation absorbed by a white lupin crop. In 1st European Conference on Grain Legumes (Ed. , A. E. P.), pp. 205–206. 1–3 06 1992, Angers, France.Google Scholar
Duthion, C., Ney, B. & Munier-Jolain, N. M. (1994). Development and growth of white lupin: implications for crop management. Agronomy Journal 86, 1039–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A., Bidinger, F., Syme, J. R. & Wall, P. C. (1981). Leaf photosynthesis, leaf permeability, crop growth, and yield of short spring wheat genotypes under irrigation. Crop Science 21, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. D. & Youssefian, Y. (1981). Dwarfing genes in wheat. In Progress in Plant Breeding (Ed. Russel, G. E.), pp. 1–35. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Gardiner, T. R., Vietor, D. M. & Craker, L. E. (1979). Growth habit and row width effects on leaf area development and light interception of field beans. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 59, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, R. M., Thorne, J. H., Hitz, W. D. & Giaquinta, R. T. (1984). Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science 225, 801–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harzic, N., Huyghe, C., Papineau, J. & Billot, C. (1995 a). Architecture variability of indeterminate autumn sown white lupin (Lupinus albus): comparison between the dwarf line XA100 and the tall cultivar Lunoble. In Improving Production and Utilisation of Grain Legumes, 2nd European Conference on Grain Legumes (Ed. , A. E. P.), p. 53. 9–13 07 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Harzic, N., Huyghe, C. & Papineau, J. (1995 b). Dry matter accumulation and seed yield of dwarf autumnsown white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75, 549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harzic, N., Huyghe, C. & Papineau, J. (1995 c). Leaf area development in a dwarf aututmn-sown white lupin (Lupinus albus). In Improving Production and Utilisation of Grain Legumes, 2nd European Conference on Grain Legumes (Ed. , A. E. P.), p. 52.9–13 07 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Huyghe, C. (1990). White lupin architecture, genetic variability, agronomic consequences. In Proceedings of the 6th International Lupin Conference (Ed. von Baer, D.), pp. 241–254. Temuco-Pucon: International Lupin Association.Google Scholar
Huyghe, C. (1991). Winter growth of autumn-sown white lupin (Lupinus albus L.): main apex growth model. Annals of Botany 67, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyghe, C. & Papineau, J. (1990). Winter development of autumn sown white lupin: agronomic breeding and consequences. Agronomie 10, 709–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyghe, C., Julier, B., Harzic, N. & Papineau, J. (1994 a). Yield and yield components of indeterminate autumn-sown white lupin (Lupinus albus) cv. Lunoble. European Journal of Agronomy 3, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyghe, C., Julier, B., Harzic, N. & Papineau, J. (1994 b). Breeding of Lupinus albus: new architectures for a further domestication. In Advances in Lupin Research (Eds Martins, J. M. Neves & Costa, M. L. Beirao da), pp. 25–41. Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Huyghe, C., Harzic, N., Julier, B. & Papineau, J. (1994 c). Comparison of determinate and indeterminate autumnsown white lupins under the western European climate. In Proceedings of the First Australian Lupin Technical Symposium (Eds Dracup, M. & Palta, J.), pp. 123–128. Perth, Western Australia: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. (1987). Crop management. In Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses, 2nd Edn ( Ed. Wilcox, J. R.), pp. 355–390. Agronomy Monograph n°16. Madison WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Jones, P. N. & Carberny, P. S. (1994). A technique to develop and validate simulation models. Agricultural Systems 46, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julier, B. (1994). Etude génétique el physiologique de l'architecture déterminée chez le lupin blanc d'hiver. Conséquences agronomiques et en sélection. These ENSA Rennes.Google Scholar
Julier, B. & Huyghe, C. (1993). Description and model of the architecture of four genotypes of determinate autumn-sown white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) as influenced by location, sowing date and density. Annals of Botany 72, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julier, B., Huyghe, C., Papineau, J., Milford, G. F. J., Day, J. M., Billot, C. & Mangin, P. (1993). Seed yield and yield stability of determinate and indeterminate autumn-sown white lupins (Lupinus albus) grown at different locations in France and the UK. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. W., Gale, M. D. & Quarrie, S. A. (1983). Effects of NORIN 10 and Tom Thumb dwarfing genes on morphology, physiology and abscisic acid production in wheat. Annals of Botany 51, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H. (1972). Further experiments on photosynthesis and translocation in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 71, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sas Institute (1988). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M., Mason, W. K., Bennie, A. T. P. & Rowse, H. R. (1982). Responses of soybeans to two row spacings and two soil water levels. I. An analysis of biomass accumulation, canopy development, solar radiation interception and components of seed yield. Field Crops Research 5, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D. H., Baudoin, J. P., Beaver, J., Coyne, D. P., Halseth, D. E., Masaya, P. N., Munger, H. M., Myers, J. R., Sllbernagel, M., Yourstone, K. S. & Zobel, R. W. (1993). Improving efficiency for higher crop yield. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, R., Burton, J. W. & Kilen, T. C. (1993). Soybean growth and light interception: response to differing leaf and stem morphology. Crop Science 33, 520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanewich, K. P., Rood, S. B., Southworth, C. E. & Williams, P. H. (1991). Dwarf mutants of Brassica: responses to applied gibberellins and gibberrellin content. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 10, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar